AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA
ON 11.08.2014
Bill No. 96 of 2014
THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS
COMMISSION BILL, 2014
A
BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments
Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High
Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fifth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—
1. (1) This Act may be called the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act,
2014.
5
(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
Short title and commencement. 2
Definitions.
2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,––
(a) “Chairperson” means the Chairperson of the Commission;
(b) “Commission” means the National Judicial Appointments Commission referred to in article 124A of the Constitution;
(c) “High Court” means the High Court in respect of which recommendation for appointment of a Judge is proposed to be made by the Commission;
5
(d) “Member” means a Member of the Commission and includes its Chairperson;
(e) “prescribed” means prescribed by the rules made under this Act;
(f) “regulations” means the regulations made by the Commission under this Act.
Headquarters
of
Commission.
Reference to
Commission
for filling up of vacancies.
3. The Headquarters of the Commission shall be at Delhi.
4. (1) The Central Government shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of coming into force of this Act, intimate the vacancies existing in the posts of Judges in the
Supreme Court and in a High Court to the Commission for making its recommendations to fill up such vacancies.
(2) The Central Government shall, six months prior to the date of occurrence of any vacancy by reason of completion of the term of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High
Court, make a reference to the Commission for making its recommendation to fill up such vacancy. (3) The Central Government shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of occurrence of any vacancy by reason of death or resignation of a Judge of the Supreme
Court or of a High Court, make a reference to the Commission for making its recommendations to fill up such vacancy.
Procedure for selection of
Judge of
Supreme
Court.
10
15
20
5. (1) The Commission shall recommend for appointment the senior-most Judge of the
Supreme Court as the Chief Justice of India if he is considered fit to hold the office:
Provided that a member of the Commission whose name is being considered for recommendation shall not participate in the meeting.
(2) The Commission shall, on the basis of ability, merit and any other criteria of suitability as may be specified by regulations, recommend the name for appointment as a
Judge of the Supreme Court from amongst persons who are eligible to be appointed as such under clause (3) of article 124 of the Constitution:
25
30
Provided that while making recommendation for appointment of a High Court Judge, apart from seniority, the ability and merit of such Judge shall be considered:
Provided further that the Commission shall not recommend a person for appointment if any two members of the Commission do not agree for such recommendation.
(3) The Commission may, by regulations, specify such other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Judge of the Supreme Court as it may consider necessary.
Procedure for selection of
Judge of High
Court.
35
6. (1) The Commission shall recommend for appointment a Judge of a High Court to be the Chief Justice of a High Court on the basis of inter se seniority of High Court Judges and ability, merit and any other criteria of suitability as may be specified by regulations.
(2) The Commission shall seek nomination from the Chief Justice of the concerned
High Court for the purpose of recommending for appointment a person to be a Judge of that
High Court.
40
3
5
(3) The Commission shall also on the basis of ability, merit and any other criteria of suitabilitiy as may be specified by regulations, nominate name for appointment as a Judge of a High Court from amongst persons who are eligible to be appointed as such under clause (2) of article 217 of the Constitution and forward such names to the Chief Justice of the concerned
High Court for its views.
(4) Before making any nomination under sub-section (2) or giving its views under sub-section (3), the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court shall consult two senior-most
Judges of that High Court and such other Judges and eminent advocates of that High Court as may be specified by regulations.
10
(5) After receiving views and nomination under sub-sections (2) and (3), the Commission may recommend for appointment the person who is found suitable on the basis of ability, merit and any other criteria of suitability as may be specified by regulations.
(6) The Commission shall not recommend a person for appointment under this section if any two members of the Commission do not agree for such recommendation.
15
20
(7) The Commission shall elicit in writing the views of the Governor and the Chief
Minister of the State concerned before making such recommendation in such manner as may be specified by regulations.
(8) The Commission may, by regulations, specify such other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Chief Justice of a High Court and a Judge of a High Court as it may consider necessary.
7. The President shall, on the recommendations made by the Commission, appoint the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the Chief
Justice of a High Court or the Judge of a High Court:
25
Power of
President to require reconsideration.
Provided that the President may, if considers necessary, require the Commission to reconsider, either generally or otherwise, the recommendation made by it:
Provided further that if the Commission makes unanimous recommendation after reconsideration, the President shall make appointment accordingly.
30
8. (1) The Central Government may, in consultation with the Commission, appoint such number of officers and other employees for the discharge of functions of the Commission under this Act.
Officers and employees of
Commission.
(2) The terms and other conditions of service of officers and other employees of the
Commission appointed under sub-section (1) shall be such as may be prescribed.
(3) The Convenor of the Commission shall be the Secretary to the Government of
India in the Department of Justice.
35
40
9. The Commission shall recommend for transfer of Chief Justices and other Judges of
High Courts from one High Court to any other High Court, and for this purpose, specify, by regulations, the procedure for such transfer.
Procedure for transfer of
Judges.
10. (1) The Commission shall have the power to specify, by regulations, the procedure for the discharge of its functions.
Procedure to be followed by Commission in discharge of its functions. Power to make rules.
(2) The Commission shall meet at such time and place as the Chairperson may direct and observe such rules of procedure in regard to the transaction of business at its meetings
(including the quorum at its meeting), as it may specify by regulations.
11. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
45
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:––
(a) the fees and allowances payable to the eminent persons nominated under clause (d) of article 124A of the Constitution;
50
(b) the terms and other conditions of service of officers and other employees of the Commission under sub-section (2) of section 8;
4
(c) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed, in respect of which provision is to be made by the rules.
Power to make regulations. 12. (1) The Commission may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make regulations consistent with this Act, and the rules made thereunder, to carry out the provisions of this
Act.
5
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—
(a) the criteria of suitability with respect to appointment of a Judge of the Supreme
Court under sub-section (2) of section 5;
(b) other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Judge of the Supreme Court under sub-section (3) of section 5;
10
(c) the criteria of suitability with respect to appointment of a Judge of the High
Court under sub-section (3) of section 6;
(d) other Judges and eminent advocates who may be consulted by the Chief
Justice under sub-section (4) of section 6;
15
(e) the manner of eliciting views of the Governor and the Chief Minister under sub-section (7) of section 6;
(f) other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Judge of the High Court under sub-section (8) of section 6;
(g) the procedure for transfer of Chief Justices and other Judges from one High
Court to any other High Court under section 9;
20
(h) the procedure to be followed by the Commission in the discharge of its functions under sub-section (1) of section 10;
(i) the rules of procedure in regard to the transaction of business at the meetings of Commission, including the quorum at its meeting, under sub-section (2) of section 10;
25
(j) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, specified by regulations or in respect of which provision is to be made by regulations.
Rules
and regulations to be laid before
Parliament.
Power to remove difficulties.
13. Every rule and regulation made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days, which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation or both
Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.
14. (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central
Government may, after consultation with the Commission, by an order published in the
Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
30
35
40
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of five years from the date of commencement of this Act.
(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.
45
STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS
The Constitution of India contains provisions for the appointment of Judges of the
Supreme Court and High Courts including the transfer of Judges from one High Court to another High Court. The Supreme Court in the matter of the Supreme Court Advocates-onRecord Association Vs. Union of India in the year 1993, and in its Advisory Opinion in 1998 in the Third Judges case, had interpreted clause (2) of article 124 and clause (1) of article 217 of the Constitution with respect to the meaning of ‘‘consultation’’ as ‘‘concurrence’’.
Consequently, a Memorandum of Procedure for appointment of Judges to the Supreme
Court and High Courts was formulated, and the same is being followed for appointment.
2. After review of the relevant constitutional provisions, the pronouncements of the
Supreme Court and consultations with eminent Jurists, it is felt that a broad based National
Judicial Appointments Commission should be established for making recommendations for appointments of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The said Commission would provide a meaningful role for the judiciary, the executive and eminent persons to present their view points and make the participants accountable, while also introducing transparency in the selection process. Keeping this in view, a Bill, namely, the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-first Amendment) Bill, 2014 has been introduced in Parliament which provides for the establishment of the National Judicial Appointments Commission to discharge functions specified therein.
3. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 inter alia provides for the time frame to initiate the process of filling up of vacancies in the Supreme Court and High
Courts and the procedure for selection of Chief Justice of India, Chief Justice of High Courts and Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. It further provides that if two members of
National Judicial Appointments Commission do not agree, then the Commission shall not make such recommendation. It also provides that the President may, if necessary, require the
Commission to reconsider the recommendation. However, if the Commission makes unanimous recommendations on such reconsideration, then the President shall make the appointment accordingly. 4. Further, the Bill provides that the National Judicial Appointments Commission may make regulations inter alia specifying the criteria of suitability with respect to the appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, the procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of Judge of the Supreme Court and High Court, the procedure for transfer of Judges from one High Court to another High Court and the procedure to be followed by the Commission in the discharge of its functions.
5. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 seeks to broad base the appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts, enables participation of judiciary, executive and eminent persons and ensures greater transparency, accountability and objectivity in the appointment of the Judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts.
6. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
NEW DELHI;
The 8th August, 2014.
RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD
5
PRESIDENT’S RECOMMENDATION UNDER ARTICLE 117 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
————
[Copy of letter No. K-11016/1/2009-US. II, dated 8 August, 2014 from Shri Ravi
Shankar Prasad, Minister of Law and Justice to the Secretary-General, Lok Sabha]
The President, having been informed of the subject matter of the proposed National
Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014, recommends to the House for the consideration of the Bill, under article 117 (3) of the Consitution of India.
————
6
FINANCIAL MEMORANDUM
Sub-clause (1) of clause 8 provides that the Central Government may appoint such number of officers and other employees, as it may consider necessary, for the discharge of the functions of the National Judicial Appointments Commission.
2. Sub-clause (3) of clause 8 provides that Secretary to the Government of India in the
Department of Justice shall be the Convener of the Commission.
3. Item (a) of sub-clause (2) of clause 11 provides that the fee and allowances payable to eminent persons shall be such as may be prescribed.
4. The expenditure on account of the aforesaid provisions would be approximately rupees three crores on account of additional requirement of personnel in addition to the existing setup/Secretariat. At this stage, it is not practicable to make an estimate of exact expenditure, both recurring and non-recurring, likely to be involved in the financial year
2014-2015. However, the expenditure would be met from the Consolidated Fund of India.
7
MEMORANDUM REGARDING DELEGATED LEGISLATION
Clause 11 of the Bill confers power upon the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the provisions of the Bill. The matters in respect of which rules may be made are—(a) the fees and allowances payable to the eminent persons under clause (d) of article
124A of the Constitution; (b) the terms and other conditions of service of officers and other employees of the National Judicial Appointments Commission under sub-section (2) of section 8; and (c) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed, in respect of which provision is to be made by the rules.
2. Clause 12 of the Bill confers power upon the National Judicial Appointments
Commission to make regulations consistent with the Act and the rules made thereunder to carry out the provisions of the Act. The matters in respect of which regulations may be made are matters relating to—(a) the criteria of suitability with respect to appointment of a
Judge of the Supreme Court under sub-section (2) of section 5; (b) other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Judge of the Supreme Court under sub-section (3) of section 5; (c) the criteria of suitability with respect to appointment of a
Judge of the High Court under sub-section (3) of section 6; (d) other Judges and eminent advocates who may be consulted by the Chief Justice under sub-section (4) of section 6;
(e) the manner of eliciting views of the Governor and the Chief Minister under sub-section
(7) of section 6; (f) other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a
Judge of the High Court under sub-section (8) of section 6; (g) the procedure for transfer of
Chief Justices and other Judges from one High Court to any other High Court under section 9; (h) the procedure to be followed by the Commission in the discharge of its functions under sub-section (1) of section 10; (i) the rules of procedure in regard to the transaction of business at the meetings of Commission, including the quorum at its meeting, under sub-section (2) of section 10; and (j) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, specified by regulations or in respect of which provision is to be made by regulations.
3. The rules made by the Central Government and the regulations made by the
Commission shall be laid as soon as may be after they are made before each House of
Parliament.
4. The matters in respect of which the rules and regulations may be made are generally matters of procedure and administrative details and it is not practicable to provide for them in the Bill itself. The delegation of legislative power is, therefore, of a normal character.
8
LOK SABHA
————
A
BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other
Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
————
(Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad, Minister of Law and Justice)
GMGIPMRND—2183LS(S3)—11.08.2014.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.…
- 239 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
| Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…
- 1242 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Zane Singletary 09/16/2014 ENGL-101-16 Ms. Kimberly B. Ward Should Judges be Appointed or Elected Introduction and Outline Since the United States Democracy was first established, legislators and constituents have asked the question “Should judges be appointed or elected?”. Many state legislators have argued that since judges make decisions that directly affect constituents, they must be elected and nonpartisan races are held for judgeships. On the other hand, the United States Constitution states that all federal judges shall be appointed to the bench and have lifetime tenure so as to preserve judicial independence. Although this policy may sound admirable, this method oftentimes leads to higher executives appointing their personal comrades,…
- 699 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The president and Congress have some control of the judiciary with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justices. Congress also may impeach judges, alter the organization of the federal court system, and amend the Constitution.…
- 1614 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The primary objection against the Judges’ Case model of appointments is that it finds no basis in constitutional text and is the product of a frenetic Court. Secondly, it places a potent CJP at the center of the judicial system, which severely compromises independence within the judiciary. The primacy accorded to his opinion further facilitated the judiciary’s transformation into a self-perpetuating institution. It also served to politicize the judiciary, which eroded the judiciary’s institutional impression in the public eye. Moreover, the lack of clarity surrounding the application of the seniority principle allowed room for maneuvering, making an already opaque procedure more indefinite and obscure. All of these observations confirm that…
- 151 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Judges represent an important central role in adjudicating disputes in a fair, unbiased manner by applying legal rules and play a vital role in controlling the exercise of power by the state. Judges may leave their position by the termination of an appointment: Dismissal due to breaching judicial disciplines, resignation of their own choice or suggestion by the Lord Chancellor for misbehaviour, removal due to disability by permanent infirmity from performance of duties and retirement at the age of 70 under the Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993.…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
many of the confirmed judges, Marbury included. Marbury sued to force Madison to give up…
- 22373 Words
- 118 Pages
Better Essays -
Then go on to the judiciary the CRA 2005 and how judges are elected i.e. the juridical appointment commissions 14 member ect…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Judges should not be elected to serve on the bench by the citizenry through normal election procedure, because the average citizen knows nothing about the intricacies of the law and the difference between a sound judge and a poor one. Judges should be appointed by a body of their legal peers instead of being elected in a popularity contest by the masses.…
- 2478 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
2. This agreement shall remain in effect till the morning of Sunday November 9, 2014 from the date hereof.…
- 242 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Under the 1973 constitution of Pakistan parliamentary pattern has been implemented in the provinces. It is a common practice in federal states that the pattern of government operating in the centre is also followed by the federating units.…
- 846 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the military-backed caretaker government, the issue of reforming the archaic business laws, rules and regulations came to the fore strongly. It had further revised the proposed law and approved the same on the day before it stepped down. However, the new parliament constituted in 2009 decided to review the proposed law yet another time. Now that the revision process has been completed and the bill concerned might be introduced during the next and last session of the present parliament for adoption.…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Once the provisions of Act become applicable, it continues to be applicable even if number of…
- 5311 Words
- 22 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Even though the judiciary decries the principle to express its helplessness as it is still haunted by this old doctrine. The law being the mechanism to regulate the behavior of the people it is necessary to make it as a predictable working system. The Law Commission in its report recommended to modify the existing law and introduced the bill to amend the law to make the state liable like any other ordinary person. It asked why the government should not be placed in the same position like that of a private employer subject to the same rights and duties imposed by the state. After evaluating similar laws existing in different countries, the government introduced a bill in the Parliament on August 31, 1965 but it lapsed and this was reintroduced in 1967, 1969. If there is a failure on the part of parliament to introduce reforms through legislation it would appear quite feasible for the Supreme Court in its present face of activism to overrule the lingering old principle and to do away with the so called immunity for sovereign functions. It is necessary to go through the similar laws existing in U.K & USA and in…
- 875 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Now we will start our discussion on the Indian Contract Act. First of all we should…
- 3675 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays