Preview

Natural Disasters in Nuclear Energy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2717 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Natural Disasters in Nuclear Energy
Natural Disasters in Nuclear Energy Development
Carlaine Puckett
Strayer University

Abstract
The modern day dependency on fossil fuels has led to a global search for ethical and environmentally-sound alternative energy. Among the most powerful is nuclear energy, though it is mired in controversy. This essay describes, among other things, the nuclear energy process, and with it the weaknesses. Amid the hope of one day using nuclear energy as a “green” energy source, there is much fear of devastation, due to the four main nuclear disasters in Earth’s history. After the most recent nuclear disaster, Fukushima, Germany reversed their stance on nuclear energy, denouncing any future involvement with the research, development, and usage of nuclear energy. Every disaster and development can be considered part of a learning curve. The world has generally embraced nuclear power. Natural disasters should not cause hesitation in the research and development of nuclear energy but rather result in greater care and understanding for the policies and procedures surrounding nuclear energy research, development, usage and storage.

Natural Disasters in Nuclear Energy Development The controversy associated with the use of nuclear energy as a modern alternative to fossil fuels has much to do with the fear of natural disasters diminishing the structural integrity of nuclear power plants. This anxiety should not prevent scientists from pursuing nuclear energy as a clean, efficient alternative to fossil fuel consumption but rather place emphasis on the role of engineering and safety policies. The fear of natural disasters does not warrant the current hesitations in nuclear energy usage and development. Ever since the discovery of coal in the middle ages as an “alternative energy” in lieu of wood, or the burning of whale oil to keep Victorian streets lit at night, humans have sought new energy sources to keep pace with the



References: Harrison, P. (2009, March 1). History of alternative energy. Benefits-of-Recycling. Retrieved from http://www.benefits-of-recycling.com/historyofalternativeenergy.html. Johnston, R. (2011, April 2). Database of radiological incidents and related events. Retrieved from http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/radevents/index.html. Pollowitz, G. (2011, May 31). Germany: No nuclear power by 2022. National Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/268457/germany-no-nuclear-power-2022-greg-pollowitz. Roan, S. (2011, March 16). Possible health effects of nuclear crisis. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/16/health/la-he-japan-quake-radiation-20110316. Smith, D. (2011, May 30). Nuclear phase-out is a ‘Historic Moment’. The World from Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,765681,00.html. WNA: World Nuclear Association. (2011, June). Retrieved from http://www.world-nuclear.org/. WNA: World Nuclear Association. (2011, June). The Nuclear Fuel Cycle. Retrieved from http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf03.html. Yoshioka, R. (2011, July 17). Fukushima Accident Summary(3). Retrieved from http://www.shippai.org/images/html/news559/FukushimaReport-3.pdf.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eugene Robinson, author of “No Fail-Safe Option”, writes during the recent destruction of the Fukushima power plant, cautioning the use of nuclear power, and touching on the Chernobyl incident. He claims that the idea of nuclear energy, in spite of its benefits, is not worth the destruction and damage it could potentially cause.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The use of Nuclear Power has always been a controversial subject, but during the technology’s…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the theory outlines the three streams did indeed diverge after the crisis at the Fukishima-Daichi Nuclear power station on March 11th, 2011. The public outcry over the perceived danger of utilising Nuclear Power to source our energy (Is nothing new, as there has always been a strong anti-nuclear lobby within public discourse, however it reached its pinnacle during this crisis in March 2011. This is the 1st stream of the theory in action since the crisis dominating news headlines across the globe had put the question of whether Europe’s Nuclear power stations are safe on the agenda. The 2nd stream of Kingdon’s Multiple-Streams framework was initiated when the European Nuclear Safety Regulation Group (ENSREG) were empowered by the European Commission based off a mandate given to it by the European Parliament and the Council to examine the current situation which the European Nuclear Energy sector found itself in and to conduct stress tests on Nuclear reactors across the European Union. And finally, the 3rd stream was when the European Commission after consulting reports made by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Nuclear Safety Regulation Group, adopted a formal position on the matter and compiled a proposal on it. The legislative proposal adopted by the European Commission at the end of the agenda setting stage adopted the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Up until 1989, USSR dealt with the disaster alone, but after the breakdown of USSR, organizations such as UN, WHO, IAEA, and etc. played major role in evaluating the health and environmental consequences of the accident. Groups of people was exposed to high radiation, and the suffered from acute radiation sickness. And residents were suffered psychologically due to fear of radiation exposure and stress from the evacuation. Increase of Mini-satellite instability (MSI) or abnormalities, which are genetic and birth consequences, were observed from the children born after the accident. Also, Leukemia has positive relationship with radiation exposure. For better response in the future nuclear power plant accident, accessibility to accurate consequences are essential for better response in the future nuclear power plant…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the Fukushima incident, nuclear power plant is known as the “dream that failed”. Some of the nuclear investor has stop to invest in any condition which connect to the nuclear production. Due to that particular incident, Japan and Germany had shut down all their manufacture. After that, they started to be the world’s largest users in renewable resources such as solar energy and also hydroelectricity to supply power.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nuclear Power Plant

    • 2543 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Germany: Nuclear power plants to close by 2022. (2011, 30 May) BBC. Retrieved July 9, 2011 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13592208…

    • 2543 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    What went wrong in Japan

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although nuclear power plants have an enormous risk factor, their benefits are greater – or almost as great. Nuclear plants are a means to produce large amounts of energy, in an environmentally friendly manner. However, the potential for disaster is also present. We have seen this throughout history, with the Chernobyl and Three Mile Island disaster. Nonetheless, we continue to use nuclear energy. This is due to the fact that there is a global safety standard and there are several precautionary measures in place to minimize the damage and potential for fail. If there are so many precautions and safety nets, this gives rise to the question: “What went wrong in Japan then?”…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There have been more critical junctures recently, in terms of nuclear disasters, in which nuclear energy became stagnant in John Kingdon’s policy cycle. The cycle consists of policy formulation, legitimation, implementation, evaluation, and change. When the policy cycle stalls out because of natural disasters, it stagnates at the implementation phase. This is because the policy already went through the formulation stage, wherein it was simply a concept, and it was legitimized by being signed into law. Finally, at the implementation phase, once the disaster has happened, the cycle stops. There are two factors contributing to the sluggishness. The first contributing factor revolves around the difficulty to evaluate the efficiency or positive…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

    • 2681 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The earthquake which took place on March 11, 20111 in the Tohuku District, Japan triggered a massive tsunami which eventually caused a nuclear power plant outbreak. The tsunami, 14-metres in height struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, which is located in the towns of Okuma and Futaba in the Fukushima Prefecture. This resulted in loss of power to the reactors of Units 1, 2 and 3.Along with this damage, the cooling system failed to work and there were hydrogen explosions which ended in damaging the nuclear plant. The damages also include extensive release of radioactive substances into our atmosphere and our earth. This accident certainly did loads of damages to Japan and its people. There are lots of theories regarding this accident’s cause, but it comes down to either natural disaster or man-made disaster. The effects of this accident were tremendous in the aspect of social, ecology, sociology and health hazards. There were steps taken to assist in resolving the issue .In future, to prevent this kind of accident from taking place, proper safety measures should be implemented along with higher level of knowledge in running a nuclear power plant.…

    • 2681 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FEARS OF nuclear meltdown in Japan have put question marks on safety and security of `nuclear plants across the world. Analysts have predicted that the ongoing crisis in Japan will lead to soul searching about the future of nuclear power.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Power

    • 7718 Words
    • 31 Pages

    The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership: A Threat to Human Life and Health Summary The Bush Administration’s Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) would increase waste storage and proliferation concerns arising from the use and projected expansion of nuclear energy by legitimizing the use of reprocessing and enrichment technologies. GNEP is one of many fuel cycle initiatives in the global arena that aim to manage the spread of dual-use (energy and weapon) technology. GNEP plans to restart nuclear waste reprocessing in the United States and increase nuclear enrichment and reprocessing capacities abroad through the commercial use of these dual-use technologies. Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) opposes a revival of nuclear waste reprocessing in the United States or its commercialization abroad. Reprocessing threatens human health by increasing the level of radioactivity in the environment and threatens human life by increasing stockpiles of weapons-usable plutonium. The National Research Council’s Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) published seven reports since 1956 regarding radiation exposures. The latest report demonstrates that even very low levels of exposure to radiation can lead to cancer. No sustainable safe storage solutions exist for the current stockpile of more than 50,000 tons of commercially generated nuclear waste at 72 domestic sites. Reprocessing will exacerbate these problems and, surrounding communities will be at risk of exposure to low levels of radiation. Reprocessing does not recycle nuclear waste, but separates it into different waste streams and increases the total volume of nuclear waste to be disposed of by a factor of twenty or greater. The Department of Energy (DOE) proposed classifying most of this waste stream as low…

    • 7718 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays