Iris is a key character in both the movie and the book, however he role in each is quite different. First of all Iris in the book is visually a complete opposite of Iris in the movie. In the book Iris is described as corpulent, with a head full of red hair, yet in the movie she is a skinny, relatively attractive, blond. Thus, Roy's relationship with Iris in the book and in the movie is quite different. In the book Roy is not very attracted to her and in addition she is a grandmother which does not appeal to Roy at all. This also comments on Roy's personality in the book because he ends up sleeping with her anyway, even though he has no real feelings for her. The following quote illustrates Roy's actual feelings for Iris; " 'Darling,' whispered Iris, 'win for our boy.' He stared at her. 'What boy?' 'I am pregnant.' There were tears in her eyes. Her belly was slender . . . then the impact hit him. 'Holy Jesus.' " This displays how Roy really does not want to be stuck with Iris and a child. However, in the movie Iris is a romantic prospect for Roy throughout the entire story. They grow up together as friends in the film and we know that they are quite in love before Roy leaves on the train to play baseball. This is a contrasting difference from the book where we first see Iris when she is in the stands at one of Roy's games. All of these small differences add up and change Roy and Iris's relationship in the novel and the film. In the film she is romantically linked to Roy which provides him with self-esteem and a reason to become the best he can be. Yet in the book Iris supports him but more like a wise old lady and a lack of proper feelings towards her ultimately contributes to Roy's self-destruction of himself and failure.
Another important difference is the incident with Roy getting poisoned at Memo's party. The book makes this scene out be a type of self-sabotage attempt by Roy from gorging himself with food, but the movie displays this scene in a different light. When Roy is eating more hamburgers after the party, the author even describes them as "dead birds", which does not convey a pleasant image. In the movie Memo obviously poisons Roy as an attempt to keep him from playing any more games. This is important because in makes a clear statement, that it is Roy fighting against all of the corrupt people trying to buy him out. However, the book tries to make the reader perceive Roy as a very flawed person who is almost in league with others in destroying himself. This incident is also questions Roy's relationship with Memo in the novel and the film. Roy seems very wary of Memo in the film and it seems as if he has a suspicion that she is plotting against him. When he does end up poisoned it appears that he does realize that it was Memo who did it in order to keep him from playing. Nevertheless, in the novel Roy seems more trusting towards Memo, who uses him for her own greedy ideas and persuades him to throw the game in order to get the money. The quote "Memo helped. 'Don't be stingy, Roy.' 'Pile it on honey.' 'You sure are a scream the way you eat.' " shows Roy's trust in Memo and how she simply helps him destroy himself, without any remorse whatsoever. The naive Roy is fooled by Memo's looks and charm, and only realizes what he has done at the end of the book when it is too late to be fixed. Overall, this incident questions Roy's relationship with Memo and comments about his own personality, which is tremendously different in the film, compared to the novel.
Regardless of everything else in both the film and the novel, it is undoubtedly the ending of both works that cause the themes in them to be so dramatically different. The books ending involves Roy accepting the bet and appearing to throw the game. His career then heads in a downward spiral as Max Mercy publishes the information about his past and his selling out. In one of the last scenes Roy confronts the judge, Gus and Memo, apparently regretting what he did, but it is too late for him to change his future. The last line of the book is "When Roy looked into the boy's eyes he wanted to say it wasn't but couldn't, and he lifted his hands to his face and wept many bitter tears." This fittingly ends the story since Roy has finally felt the repercussions of his actions and realizes his error. Since he confided in people who were innately evil and did not rely on himself and others who really cared about him he failed. However, the films ending is completely different since Roy does not miss the game and ends up winning it for his team. He is regaled as a hero and we assume that he marries Iris and stays with his son from the short ending scene. The differences that this points out is that if a person has confidence in himself and realizes what is really important in life he can really strive to succeed. Roy used Iris and his son as a catalyst to propel him to victory and at the same time utilized his own important characteristics such as perseverance and self-assurance. Altogether, the ending is very different and thus makes the themes of both works very different with one making use of love and dedication while the other falls victim to deceit and impulsiveness.
In conclusion, the theme and purpose of the novel and the film is made changed by alterations made to Roy's relationship with Iris, Roy getting poisoned, and the ending. Roy had to make decisions in both the film and the book that were influenced by other people and either benefited or annihilated him and his career. His actions when he was influenced by lust, gluttony, power, and lack of self-confidence were self-destructive and led to his complete eradication as a person. Yet when influenced by love, hope, and incentive Roy's own natural, virtuous persona took control of him and forced him to victory.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the book, Davie fell overboard. Oh, wait, in the movie, the ship blew up. Never mind the fact that the movie was much more violent, it was completely derailed of the plot! Yes, many of the people out there like guns and bombs, but the book had many more twists and turns then the movie. I will show you one comparison I noticed. In the movie, Davie’s dad died from a tree falling on him. In the book Davie’s dad was shot. Also, the book itself didn’t start with Davie’s dad dying , it started with Davie’s dad being dead, and Mr.Campbell telling him that he belonged to the House of Shaws. Also a misfortune for the movie watchers, the trip only took 2 miles, and in the book, it took him 2 days. Therefore, there was much more events in the beginning of the book.…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Most Dangerous Game is a story and a film. They have similarities and differences. Some similarities are the setting, the château, most of the characters, and the island. The island is very mysterious and adventures in both features. General Zaroff and Rainford go in war with each other. The film follows the book in a flow. Although they seem very similar, they have many differences. There are more characters and more horror.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In reference to literary movements, naturalism and realism are quite similar but have clear differences to each other. Realism refers to writings that are based off the “real world” and the way a human in the real world would usually live their life. Naturalism is in a way a branch of realism and the stark difference between the two is that literary naturalist deemed that nature – things out of human control – determine humans/characters circumstances.…
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Another difference between the book and the novel is Gene’s confrontation with Leper, in the novel Leper goes home after he is discharged from the army and confronts Gene there. In the movie version however, Leper flees to the woods outside Devon after he is discharged but is eventually spotted by Gene who follows him into the woods where the confrontation occurs. His fragile state after his experience in the army, was a huge point of interest for me in the book. The movie, I feel, was unable to capture his essence.…
- 391 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There are other minor variances in the movie and book. For instance, there is no scene in the book where the patients play basketball, and they are shown playing basketball quite a bit. Also in the book, the fishing trip…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In a lesson before dying, I noticed many differences between the movie and book. In the book the superintendent went to inspect the children but in the movie the part was not shown, in the book it was Miss Emma's idea to bring the children in the day room but in the movie it was Grants idea and lastly in the movie they didn't show the several visits between Jefferson and Grant before he began to open up.…
- 282 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Alfred Hitchcock movie, The Birds, was said to be based on the DuMaurier story by the same name. Both versions included birds going wild and attacking humans. They also included some of the same things, for example, in the movie and the book, they boarded up the doors and windows to repel the attack, and someone is found dead at a farm with their eyes pecked out. However, the similarities are not as numerous as the differences. There are many contrasts between the story and the film, particularly in the areas of characters, and setting.…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I like the movie a christmas carol more than the book. The story a christmas carol has been a very famous story for a long time. The move was better because you could see the actions the charters was taking. Every time the charters mood would change in the movie the lighting or the music would change.…
- 694 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The movie Of Mice And Men by John Steinbeck starts with a woman running guys on horses with ravenous dogs that we can only guess are the main characters. If you read the book, then watch the movie you know all the things that happened. Though There are some features in the movie that are different than the book. Therefore some parts of the book were left out of the movie.…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both the book and the movie are very different, they have lots of similarities and differences. The Setting, Plot and Characterisation are three parts that the book and movie can be compared.…
- 333 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The example of this novel being an example of naturalism lies in its title, Of Mice and Men coming from the quote “The best laid plans of mice and men often go astray.” Someone with a positive view of naturalism would likely be able to connect with the idea of predestination, where it doesn’t matter what you do during your life, whether you end up in heaven or hell is already decided and there is nothing you can do about it. With naturalism, we are the direct victims of nature, and there is nothing we can do about it. A more minor example of naturalism within the novel itself could be Lennie accidently killing Curley’s wife. Lennie is bigger and more powerful than he thinks, and this unrecognizable power is something natural that Curley’s wife couldn’t do anything against. Once she let Lennie touch her hair, she stood no chance against Lennie’s…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
What is the relation of the character Roy to the author? How has the author described Roy?…
- 1006 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…
- 775 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Frankenstein: Movie vs. Book Mary Shelley?s Frankenstein has been done and redone many many times. The most recent version starring Kenneth Branagh, who also directed it, and Robert DeNiro has many differences when compared to the original story.…
- 762 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays