The first noted difference between the movie and book is that and the novel, before the flashback while Gene is revisiting Devon he remarks that he wants to visit two places, the tree and the marble stairs. This is a fairly important scene and gets the reader interested through foreshadowing early on in the story but was left out of the film.
The book was told in first-person from Gene’s point of view in the novel while the movie was told by a third-person narrator. I thought that the book’s first-person approach was a better idea and made the story more personal whereas the third-person narration didn’t bring you as far into Gene’s head as the book. Having Gene tell his own story added a lot more to the story in my opinion, because you were able to see for yourself what made him tick, what went on in his head, and what drove him to do the things that he did. For example, Gene's intense emotional battle before pushing Finny off the tree had to be left out of the film, making him seem more simple-minded than he came off in the book. Also, many of the confrontations and dialogs in novel were downplayed in the film Another difference between the book and the novel is Gene’s confrontation with Leper, in the novel Leper goes home after he is discharged from the army and confronts Gene there. In the movie version however, Leper flees to the woods outside Devon after he is discharged but is eventually spotted by Gene who follows him into the woods where the confrontation occurs. His fragile state after his experience in the army, was a huge point of interest for me in the book. The movie, I feel, was unable to capture his essence.
In general, I think that reading the book is always better than watching the movie and A Separate Peace definitely proved that. I thought that the drawback of the movie was that it was less personal than the novel. Although there were some things in the movie that I thought were better portrayed than I had thought of in my head for example the visuals, which is one of the benefits of seeing the film version of a book
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In conclusion the book and the movie are different ,but they still have the same memo. The book and the movie are enjoyable.…
- 107 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There was more detail in the film than the book. Most books have a lot of detail. Especially conversations and emotions. They explain how the character feels and explain what the setting is like. In the film, it also had much detail. It shows most of how the character(s) gets place to place. When reading a book, you use your imagination and in a film you can watch in. For instince, in the book, it didn't explain how Rainsford escaped from place to place. In a new chapter, he would be in a different area and it didn't describe what he did to get there. In the film, Rainsford tricked General Zaroff and got back to safety. It…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Ever read a book, and then seen the movie? The book is usually better right? That’s most likely because of the differences. The book is more descriptive most of the time. Events in the book are missing from the movie. Or the movie adds some in.…
- 219 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The difference between the film and the novel is that Nathaniel never got to meet Yo-Yo Ma. While reading the novel I wanted to see what actor would play Yo-Yo Ma. It was a disappointment to see that they did not play the scene where Nathaniel sees Yo-Yo Ma for the first time since…
- 415 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Another difference that I noticed is concerning Curley's wife. In the book there is a scene where Lennie, Candy and Crooks are gathered in Crooks' room. After a while, Curley's wife emerges and the atmosphere becomes unpleasant. Crooks finds the courage to stand up against her, and when he does, she verbally breaks him down. In the movie this scene never takes place, and by eliminating this incident Curley's wife's destructive nature stays unrevealed.…
- 634 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both the movie and the book share a basic concept of showing an understanding of a story being told. The book does a more in depth explanation and a better job of narrating the story. John Knowles novel, A Separate Peace, is a story about a destructive and corrupt relationship between Finny and Gene who both attend Devon School around World War ll where most boys went off to fight in the army not realizing there was already a war created within themselves, hence the title, A Separate Peace. The book does a much more effective job of telling the story compared to the movie. In the novel, the story is being told from Gene's perspective whereas in the movie, it is being told from a third persons point of view. Also, Cliff…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Contemplate the fact that in the book, no women are present at the end of the novel, but in the film, women play a role in the reconstruction of the new society. Possibly, this difference reflects that the book was written in 1953, whereas the film was made 14 years later.…
- 359 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Another noticeable change in the movie verses the book was the emphasis on the different characters. The main character was indisputably Michael Oher in both the book and the movie. However, the movie put a strong emphasis on Leigh Anne Touhy (who was played by Sandra Bullock) and presented her as the second most major character aside from Michael. The book, on the other hand, had a lot more facts about Sean that the movie never presented. Leigh Anne was a key player in both, but in the movie, she seemed to be so much more of a main character that the other characters that stood out in the book did not do so in the movie. The major example of that was Sean Touhy who seemed to be the first one to invest in Michael in the book unlike the movie where he played a more quiet and uninvolved role in Michael's life. There were other subtle differences that could be noticed, like having the necessary GPA for an NCAA scholarship be 2.5 (movie) instead of 2.56 (book) which led to another problem to work around, or having Michael's fight be with the gang members in his old neighborhood (movie) instead of with one of his teammates at Ole Miss (book). Overall, however, the movie attempted to portray an accurate account of the book which made it enjoyable to read and watch both.…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The next thing I’d notice was the young man actually walked into the old man's room. In the book he just bursts into his room and does the cruel deed to the old man. In the movie they just look at each other. But in the movie as they look at each other the young man also walks closer. This was another major thing they changed.…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The novel “A Separate Peace” by John Knowles focuses on numerous divergent themes throughout the book. Some of the themes in the book involve the the coming of age, acquiring responsibility as you grow older, and how you should always speculate before you do, because it could severely change your life for the worse. The author also uses numerous literary elements, techniques, and stylistic choices to convey the central idea he has intended for his work.…
- 736 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Both the book and the movie are very different, they have lots of similarities and differences. The Setting, Plot and Characterisation are three parts that the book and movie can be compared.…
- 333 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
After watching the movie and reading the book, there are some major differences such as the character development, key roles and certain scenes, yet minor differences like objects or dialogue used in the movie than the book. These differences shown between the two indicating how the book is better developed and gives more detail than the movie, which allows the reader have a better perception of how the characters' minds work, and explaining their actions…
- 1307 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
First of all, one of the biggest reasons the movie is better than the book is because of the quality of the flashbacks. In the book the flashbacks were more set in the past and much longer, sometimes too drawn out and a little boring for how much background story there is for just one day dream, whereas in the movie the daydreams are a bit shorter but more set in the present and more affect by what he does in that moment with little background because of how short they are and how close to the present they may be. The daydreams are usually much more exciting in the movie as well, whereas in the book it's set back to just a boring doctor surgery, that was…
- 777 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading and watching the movie it gave me an idea about what's different and the how similar they are and they are 95% different. In the book it goes in more detail at the ending and in the movie it leaves of a cliff hanger. In the book, charlie was given twenty dollars for working hard and everyone at his job wanted him to leave because he was too smart. In the movie his “friends” made a vote for him to leave to get him fired because they were challenged. The movie did go in more detail how his “friends” are more evil in the book. Ms. kinnin and Charlie got in a relationship and almost got married, charlie took drugs, and he road a motorcycle. The biggest difference was that charlie didn’t buried Algerian and Algerian was putted in his…
- 163 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays