Preview

Neutrality In America's Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Neutrality In America's Foreign Policy
During the Washington, Adams, and Jefferson administrations (from 1776 to 1807) neutrality was America’s main foreign policy. In determining that neutrality was the overall focus of American diplomacy, one must assess the deviations from, as well as the success, of neutrality. Neutrality was originally implemented by George Washington in order to maintain the young country’s best interests. However, lapses in neutrality occurred when the government was forced to favor one foreign power, either Great Britain or France, through treaties. Furthermore, commercial interests ultimately drove America’s decisions and thus influenced the effectiveness of neutrality. Despite such lapses in success, America’s number one foreign policy remained neutrality. …show more content…

Because commerce was of high importance to the growing nation, neutrality, in order to maintain trade, was necessary. Thomas Paine even stated, “Our plan is commerce,” and emphasized the importance of neutrality to the American economy by saying “we ought to form no political connection with any part of it [Europe],” (B). For instance, Jay’s Treaty negatively affected American commerce and political relations with France. Additionally, James Madison criticized the treaty as being “ready to sacrifice... the dearest interests of our commerce...” (G). The treaty not only affected political diplomacy with France, but also affected relations with Spain and their North American colonies. Spain saw the treaty as a sign that the Americans were building an alliance with Britain and felt a need to strengthen their American territories. This lead to Pinckney’s Treaty, in 1795, which set the boundary line between the United States and the Spanish territories, as well as allowed the use of the Mississippi River and the Louisiana sea port to both the Americans and the Spanish (H). Pinckney’s Treaty protected American commerce along the Mississippi and resulted in peaceful relations with Spain. Later, during Adams’ presidency, the seizure of American merchant ships by France raised tensions that resulted in the Quasi War. The disruption of American commerce forced the nation to disregard neutrality in order to protect their trading rights. The Convention of 1800 concluded the war and promised that “Property captured... shall be mutually restored...” (I). The Convention revealed the evident commercial intentions of the Quasi War and set the American economy as a priority equal to that of neutrality. However, Great Britain continued to seize American ships and impress American sailors. Instead of engaging in war, Jefferson opted to pass the Embargo Act of 1807 in an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1793, the British government violated international law by ordering naval commanders to begin seizing any American ship that carried French goods or was sailing for a French port. By 1794, several Hundred American ships were confiscated. Choices were to Join the British navy or be imprisoned. The British also armed Indians to attack settlers. On April 16, 1794, Washington named John Jay as a special envoy to Great Britain. They made an agreement; Jay wanted them to settle all major issues: to get the British out of their forts along the Great Lakes, to secure reparations for the losses of American shippers, compensation for southern slaves carried away by British ships in 1783, and a new commercial treaty that would legalize American trade with the British West Indies. Jay accepted the British definition of neutral rights – that exports of tar, pitch and other products needed for warships were contraband and that such military products could not go in neutral ships to enemy ports – and the “rule of 1756” prevailed, meaning that trade was prohibited in peacetime because of mercantilist restrictions could not be opened in wartime. Britain also gained most-favored-nation treatment in American commerce and a promise that French privateers would not be outfitted in American ports. Finally, Jay conceded that the British need not compensate U.S. Citizens for the enslaved people who have escaped during the war and that the pre-Revolutionary American debts to the British merchants would be paid by the U.S. Government. In return, Jay won three important points: British evacuation of their six northwestern forts by 1796, reparations for the seizures of American ships and cargo in 1793 – 1794, and the right of American…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmond Charles Édouard Genêt (1763-1834) had been a representative for France in Vienna, St. Petersburg, and Berlin just before the French Revolution. A short time later, in 1792, he was removed from his position in Russia because of his revolutionary passions.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Washington second term as president in 1793 war between France and Britain, Austria, Prussia, Sardinia and the Netherlands broke out. Proclamation of Neutrality was a proclamation designed to keep America out of wars. By America not picking sides this proclamation was keeping America out of the war. Washington wrote this proclamation to keep the country together because one half of the country was on the French side and the other half on great Britain side Washington knew that if they picked a side it would bring the country he united to a destruction. Other than keeping America out of wars Washington also settled conflicts between America and other nations.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the United States was attempting to establish itself in diplomatic affairs, this became increasingly difficult to do since the federal government had little power when it came to tariffs and import duties, and also because it had no way of enforcing any agreement which it made with other countries. John Jay's Treaty with Great Britain proposed measures which would improve relations between Great Britain and the U.S., but because the U.S. was not a strong military power, it lacked the means to enforce the agreements of Jay's Treaty. A similar type of situation occurred when the U.S. tried to negotiate with Spain over the right to navigate on the Mississippi River. Because of the weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation, the United States did not reach a peaceful settlement concerning the Mississippi River until the Pinckney Treaty of the 1790's.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Washington, Adams, and the Jefferson administrations, the United States was thrust into the decision of joining either Britain or France, the two most powerful European nations. In determining the effects of foreign policy on the developing nation, one must establish the overall direction of the United States took. As a budding nation, George Washington proposed the idea of neutrality in order for the country to have no involvement in European affairs. However, Federalists and Democratic Republicans were outraged by this decision since the Federalists supported the British while the Democratic Republicans supported the French. Neutrality also allowed the United States to temporarily smooth its relations with Europe because of commercial interest. Therefore, neutrality, instead of siding with either Britain or France or through their commercial interests, was the obvious direction taken by foreign policy.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5.01 World War Again

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Reasons for neutrality: the US did not want to form global alliances so that they could lessen the chance of another global conflict, and the US wanted to keep the peace. Neutrality changed throughout the war by it being very strict by the first neutrality act and dramatically changing by the third neutrality act. The first neutrality act barred Americans from lending money to wearing nations or selling arms. Laws did not differentiate between aggressive nations and the countries they invaded. The second neutrality act was that US ships could not carry passengers or goods to warring nations. But cash and carry was an exception to that being that it was a ways that the US could sell military supplies to warring nations. These nations were required to transport supplies on their own ships and pay for everything in cash. The third neutrality act ended the law to ban selling arms to foreign countries. (Cash and carry still applied). Then eventually President Roosevelt passed the lend-lease act which allowed the president to sell arms or provide defensive aid to other nations without those nations having to pay cash. So you can see how much their opinions on neutrality changed.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Embargo Act of 1807 was an act that prohibited the buying and selling of foreign goods. This act was created by Thomas Jefferson as a way to demand respect from the European power. The intention of this act was put in place to get foreign powers to understand how important America was to their economy. Europe relied on America for supplies during the Napoleonic War, so Jefferson assumed that the loss of America's raw materials would result in Britian and France finally respecting the U.S and its neutrality, and avoid getting into foreign wars as an effect of trading. During the Napoleonic War, America was trading with both France and Britain, and therefore it was difficult to keep its neutrality because of the close contact with the opposing sides. Jefferson viewed the Embargo Act as a way to protect Americans neutrality, and avoid going into war. The Embargo Act of 1807 failed because the big powers had other sources for resources, therefore they had no need to beg America for its raw materials. The Embargo Act increased tension between European powers and America because they were not in favor of…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights. Our founding fathers, specifically George Washington, are responsible for much of the influence regarding foreign policy after their time period and up to the present day. Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned the country to stay out of permanent foreign entanglements and to stay neutral. The United States stayed faithful to Washington’s warnings for about 125 years. But, when the age of Imperialism hit, the country was forced to intervene to prevent other countries from rising up and becoming world powers. The atrocities of imperialism caused something that America will always regret; The First World War. After the war, the United States’ foreign policy changed from all out intervention to almost complete isolation, similar to what George Washington suggested. After the Second World War, American foreign policy back once again to intervention to try and make the world a better and more peaceful place. In comparison, each foreign policy have nearly no similarities, but a wealth of differences.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first president, George Washington, had wanted to stay neutral with other nations. George Washington had created the Proclamation of Neutrality to this and “adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial toward the belligerent Powers (doc.1);” Washington did not want to get into conflict with the belligerent Powers because he knew that if he did, then America would go through another war that could affect the progress of the new country’s development. In George Washington’s Farewell Speech, he had said that “ it is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world (doc.2).” Washington said this because his goal was to…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early stages of the political United States, between 1789 and 1825, foreign policy was controversial with the popular demand of the American people. The foreign policy was primarily acts of neutrality and refusal to be involved with European affairs that came out of a defensive reaction to perceived threats from Europe. Two of these policies in include Washington’s Proclamation of Neutrality and the Monroe Doctrine. Both of these policies expressed the neutrality of the United States in European affairs and helped the new country to develop without the constant threat of war.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his Farewell Address, George Washington mentions that Americans should mind American business and not be concerned with foreign conflicts because the United States had just won a very expensive war for their independence and already owed money to their new ally the French. This was a warning to all Americans because during that time America was still young, and it had many of its own problems to solve. Jefferson was also not in favor of getting involved with foreign entanglements. As Napoleon advanced into Europe, Jefferson decided to remain neutral in the conflict by banning all European trade from American Ports because of the British forces firing upon the Chesapeake. As harassment from Barbary pirates began to become an issue Washington was persuaded to build up an American Navy in order to protect those in harm and to retrieve the captured sailors. Thomas Jefferson’s approach to the pirates was a little different from Washington’s in that he chooses to implement a blockade of Tripoli and other Barbary…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Thomas Jefferson was a well-respected and beloved president he did make some mistakes during his presidency. Some of his mistakes negatively affected the entre citizenry of the United States. Thomas Jefferson’s Embargo Act of 1807 was an attempt to punish the French and the British for their interference with American trade while the two European powers were in war with each other. The law Jefferson passed failed to achieve its goal. Barring the American ships from usage of the European ports stifled American trade. This act ended up damaging American merchants more than the European government. American exports went down seventy-five percent and imports went down fifty percent. This was a great setback for American merchants. Jefferson’s hope was that the Embargo Act might prevent a war between America and Britain. It did for a short time but ended up being a precursor to the War of 1812. Congress repealed the Embargo Act in 1809, just days before Jefferson’s presidency would end. The Non-Intercourse Act that prohibited trade with France and Britain replaced the Embargo Act.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Choose a major US diplomatic crisis to review. After some research, write a 2-page on the crisis. Focus on how the U.S. State Department worked to diffuse the crisis.…

    • 906 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism Project APUSH

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While President Jefferson passed the Embargo Act in 1807 in an attempt to prevent war, it essentially led to the war of 1812 against Britain. The Embargo Act stated that the United States would not engage in any foreign trade world-wide. The intentions of the act were good – by stopping trade with everyone (including Britain and France),…

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Foreign Policy

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When one looks to the United States, both in the past and present, and its international presence, one common theme constantly pops up. Whenever the flag moves beyond the borders of the country, there always is a democratic or humans rights or peace reason for doing so. Regardless of the actual motives of the government and the American people, to us and the rest of the world, the United States has become the beacon for freedom and equality for all. After all, isn’t that what Americans strive to be? All of the propaganda associated with the United States, particularly the American Dream, is based on this idea of everyone has an equal opportunity. It only seems fitting that the people of America try to spread this ideology on a global front. However, while the word of the leaders of this country may ring loud and clear, do their actions and involvement at a global level actually reflect the ideas held so dear by the American people? The lack of transparency has clouded people from making an accurate analysis regarding America’s entrance and escalation on the international stage. During the early 1900s, and even looking to the present day, on balance has the rise of American as an empire or hegemon been working for the global good? Looking at this idea in purely black and white terms, sure. US involvement during the late 1800s and early 1900s, including the liberation of Spanish colonies such as Cuba and the Philippines, without a doubt yielded numerous international benefits to the natives of these regions and the United States. However, if when looking deeper and longer, to the actual motivation for the rapid rise of the US to the top of the international society and what actually happened after the initial involvement, it becomes more apparent that maybe, the US was not necessarily the perfect nation that everyone, including US citizens thought they were. Due to the game of politics, the desire to expand the economy, and the thoughts about acquiring land in…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays