He does this by creating stories in order to get to their point of explanation he's not concerned with accuracy. It's not a historical case but it’s laid out in that framework in order to give us a sense of where the concepts and categories came from. He wants to show you how you got to where you are so you can transcend it that these values aren’t fixed and they never were to begin with. The connecting factor in his work is internalizing the notion of evil, and guilt. He describes evil as an intention of man against man, the weak against the strong. He uses nobles and priests to drive the point. He says that the nobles have their own notion of good and evil and abide by it, the priestly class detaches themselves from the nobles and redefines the good of the nobles as evil. This makes the sense of evil subjective. He used the priestly class as an example of raissonement, an anger that can't be managed, it's complete resentment bordering on hatred which fuels the priestly class. He uses this story to show that evil is fueled by raissonement. Evil becomes a psychological definition which, manifests itself in groups becoming the general will. An internalized expression of rasissonement leads to a profound sense of guilt, it’s a negative force causing great unhappiness it turns into a state of being. This relates directly to his notion of nihilism because raissonement in an external force or internal force cause you to not be who you are giving a sense of contempt outward and inward self-laceration and internalize makes you psychologically doomed because an internalized notion of anger and resentment from guilt only makes you find fault within yourself. Reinvention of the idea of a human being by realizing that the values aren’t
He does this by creating stories in order to get to their point of explanation he's not concerned with accuracy. It's not a historical case but it’s laid out in that framework in order to give us a sense of where the concepts and categories came from. He wants to show you how you got to where you are so you can transcend it that these values aren’t fixed and they never were to begin with. The connecting factor in his work is internalizing the notion of evil, and guilt. He describes evil as an intention of man against man, the weak against the strong. He uses nobles and priests to drive the point. He says that the nobles have their own notion of good and evil and abide by it, the priestly class detaches themselves from the nobles and redefines the good of the nobles as evil. This makes the sense of evil subjective. He used the priestly class as an example of raissonement, an anger that can't be managed, it's complete resentment bordering on hatred which fuels the priestly class. He uses this story to show that evil is fueled by raissonement. Evil becomes a psychological definition which, manifests itself in groups becoming the general will. An internalized expression of rasissonement leads to a profound sense of guilt, it’s a negative force causing great unhappiness it turns into a state of being. This relates directly to his notion of nihilism because raissonement in an external force or internal force cause you to not be who you are giving a sense of contempt outward and inward self-laceration and internalize makes you psychologically doomed because an internalized notion of anger and resentment from guilt only makes you find fault within yourself. Reinvention of the idea of a human being by realizing that the values aren’t