Both characters reject ordinary standards and morals; good and evil are ambiguous, and they are pressured both socially and emotionally. “ … I am eking out my days in my corner, taunting myself with the bitter and entirely useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot seriously become anything; that only a fool can become something.” as indicated in this quote, the underground man believes that “an intelligent man” is incapable of becoming prominent. “Yes, sir, an intelligent nineteenth century man must be, is morally bound to be, an essentially characterless creature; and a man of character, a man of action-an essentially limited creature.”, the quote is an elaboration on the character’s previous statement; he defines “an intelligent man” that is contrary to the norm. Correspondingly, “‘The old woman was only an illness.... I was in a hurry to overstep.... I didn't kill a human being, but a principle!’”, as stated in the novel, Raskolnikov has a different moral perspective on humans too. Being a killer, to justify his actions, Raskolnikov considers his victim as “an illness” and “principle”; she was merely a human to him. They both possess distinct views on humans, contrasting the standard…
Raskolnikov's name means “divided,” which is appropriate since his fundamental character trait is his alienation from human society. His pride and intellectualism lead him to disdain humanity. Raskolnikov is split between an emotion ego and a logic ego. The conflict between these two sides of his character drives him insane and causes him to sink into apathy until one personality wins out over the other.…
Rasconikov’s isolated, detached, sneaky and disconnected side is when most of his intellectual scheming goes on. There is never any spontaneous moves when in this state, but more so every action being premeditated. This side of his personality is where he strategizes his theories about crime and how to commit it. Raskolnikov believes that the “extraordinary” are able to be independent, and not influenced by others on the outside, but only being influenced by oneself, being self-sufficient without company or the hand of another, which explains why his intellectual side is very isolated.…
Take the character of Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov as a lead example. In the famous novel Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov’s character completely alienates himself from society at points in time, and never shows sentiment to others and objects around him. His character is not one to care for how others feel; he cares for himself and his personal gain in the world. Raskolnikov’s climax in the novel crashes in as he commits the murders of Alyona and Lizaveta Ivanova. However, along with being a nihilist, Raskolnikov practices utilitarianism, so he believes that committing those murders will be justified in the end due to the fact that a thousand good deeds will come from that one tragedy. (Dostoevsky) Nonetheless, nihilism is found in real life as well as novels. Picture a wife, coming home from work early one day to find that her husband is in bed with another woman. The wife is at a point in her life where she will have to reevaluate the things most essential to her everyday life. Most likely, she will make the choice to leave her husband and begin a new life on her own. From her decision, she chose the most basic of needs, what nurtures and drains the springs of hope in her life. She chose to reject the objective truth, one of the basic principles of nihilism. Nihilism happens is found in many events through life, not just in the form of an atheist, but in examples of a wife leaving her husband, a man losing his job, a son leaving his abusive parents, and so on…
By the end of Dostoyesky's Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of "extraordinary" men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikov's proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had "been printed and read a thousand times"(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsche's more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the "extraordinary" man presented in his…
Nietzche created what he believed to be the three nihilistic themes; epistemological failure, the value of destruction, and cosmic purposelessness. All of these ideas relate back to the main belief that once you strip away all the illusions of life, it turns out to being meaningless, and that those who continue to hang onto those illusions will be miserable. The theme that is most often related to 1800s nihilsm is the value of destruction. Especially in Russia, nihilists were related to violence and extremism. “Eventually the nihilists of the 1860s and ‘70s came to be regarded as disheveled, untidy, unruly, ragged men who rebelled against tradition and social order.” (Encyclopedia Britannica) they abandoned all social ties and believed that all evil is tied to ignorance, which could only be overcome by science. Those who became nihilists in this revolutionary time period, inspired and influenced many artists, philosophers, authors and poets. One of the most famous works that included and referenced nihlism in the 1800s was Ivan Turgenev’s novel Fathers and Sons (1862). Turgenev uses the main character, a doctor named Bazarov, to convey nihilistic ideas. In the novel, Barazov preaches of total and utter negation. Needless to say, the idea of nihilsm spoke to many individuals who felt they did not have a concrete place in…
Dostoevsky does not let the reader understand, until later on in the novel, that Raskolnikov had been thinking and planning out this evil for long period of time. Raskolnikov believes of himself be a sort of Napoleon figure in his community and that his action of murder will set people free from the suffering of their poor lives. But the opposite occurs, Raskolnikov does not become free from his suffering, he begins to face a fast descent into a psychotic break. Dostoevsky is trying to show the readers that you cannot combat suffering with sin and evil tendencies. Raskolnikov chose the easy way out; he chose to go against God and take matters into his own hands and ultimately suffers even more in his life because of…
“Nobody, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in contrary direction at the time.” (Laurence Sterne) In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, it is this exact miscalculation that leads the protagonist Raskolnikov (Rodya) to his ultimate mental, physical and social demise. Similarly, the theme of the novel directly correlates to Sterne’s quote, as Dostoyevsky delves into the psychology of a criminal, centering the novel on a murder and its after-affects on the transgressor.…
After Raskolnikov confesses to the murder of Alyona and Lizaveta, he is sentenced to eight-years in a prison camp in Siberia, where he is forced to perform hard labor. Despite his confession, he still has not repented for his actions and refuses to surrender his heart, body, and soul completely to God. Even now, he still believes he did not commit anything inherently wrong or sinful. At this point, nothing has really changed significantly other than his environment--simply, same old feelings, just a different place. Due to his pride, he is obsessed with the idea that he is superior and “extraordinary” (249).…
Raskolinikov is able to forgive himself easier once he has the time to reflect and serve his punishment. After committing the crime Raskolinikov eventually accepts that he must suffer the consequences, by law or by his own mental prowess; "If he has a conscience he will suffer for his mistake. That will be punishment - as well as the prison" (Dostoyevsky 230). The human brain dictates that all actions should have either a logical or emotional purpose, Raskolinikov struggles to find a good enough reason and his mind endures the penalty, until he is properly punished and serves out his sentence in Siberia with a quiet mind and a happy ending with Sonya to look forward…
Winslade argues that it is morally and legally impermissible to violate a competent patients right to refuse medical treatment. Through examples such as Dax Cowart, Winslade suggests that one should have the right to choose or refuse treatment rather than being forced to endure unwanted pain. Although he accepts the idea that Dax’s family members, doctors, and lawyers wanted to preserve Dax’s life for the possibility of a brighter future, Winslade firmly believes that Dax’s requests shouldn’t have been ignored. I will highlight both the physical and psychological transformations experienced by Dax, the doubt felt about the quality of his future life, the treatment and ignorance of his desires, and how his relationships were affected by the tragedy. Then, I will give multiple reasons of why I agree with Dr. Winslade’s argument and provide concrete recommendations for how to improve this ethical issue.…
In the book “Crime and Punishment”, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has faced many difficulties and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by the law of nature, men have been divided into two groups of “ordinary” and “extraordinary”.…
The bible has many stories that are controversial and, sometimes it is difficult to understand what the narrator was trying to communicate to the audience. The story of Dinah is one such narrative and although most bible versions title it “The rape of Dinah”, not all scholars read it in this way. Shemesh and Bechtel present two differing opinions on the Rape of Dinah.…
Guilt is a force in all that has the ability to bring people to insanity. When guilt becomes great enough, the effects it has on people go much deeper than the surface. People's minds and body's are overpowered by the guilt that consumes them every second they live with their burden. The devastating effects of guilt are portrayed vividly in Dostoevsky's fictional but all to real novel Crime and Punishment. In the story, the main character Raskolnikov commits a murder and suffers with the guilt throughout. Eventually his own guilt destroys himself and he is forced to confess. Through Raskolnikov, Dostoevsky bestows on the reader how guilt destroys Raskolnikov's physical and mental well being, which, in time, leads to complete alienation from society.…
Although it’s hard to know what he was like before the novel started, it can be inferred that he wasn’t always insane. Poverty and anger drove a man who used to be a hardworking university student to commit a murder and lose his sanity. From the opening of the book, his paranoia is evident. Raskolnikov seemed to have no other objective besides worrying about the thoughts of others. This paranoia is part of what makes him so impulsive. In many parts of the book, he allows his insanity to think for him. Raskolnikov’s dreams and hallucinations come after the paranoia and impulsiveness. They truly show how alone he is. The real-life connection between sanity and interaction with people is evident in Crime and Punishment. As Raskolnikov begins to talk to people again, his mental state gets better. His mind is at its worst when he is alone. If Raskolnikov had friends to rely on from the beginning, Crime and Punishment might have been a very different…