Preview

Nine Ten

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1050 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nine Ten
Everyone complains about things in life they rather not do. Anything from doing the dishes at home to even boarding a plane for a holiday vacation. People tend to highlight the negatives on what they're doing and not the positives. If the task they have to do doesn't benefit them they will most likely consider it negative. This brings out how selfish some people can really be if it doesn't pertain them. As shown in the play, "Nine Ten," by Warren Leight, a group of people awaiting on jury duty give out commotion on why they shouldn't be there. These people try to give out reasons why they should go back to their normal lives instead of doing this. Many think jury duty is a way of putting others through annoying and compensated work . In reality, jury duty isn't as bad and it's a great way of serving our country in many different aspects. The jurors think everything is going bad with their lives just because of these simple ways of making their country even better. After completing these tasks they are let free in just a short amount of time. Little does everyone know, a real tragic event, and not some trivial thing, is going to happen the next day and will change their lives forever.

As the play unfolds, we are presented with some of the characters and their situation at the jury grand hall. People are seated at different benches in the room. "Lyris: Why do they call us at eight-thirty? It's like, nine already, and they haven't said anything." (Line 7), the opening consist of complaints on why they're up so early if nothing is happening. Jury duty is a slow process for everyone and not just the jurors. Picking out the names of people who are going to serve takes a hefty amount of time as people come in at different times in the morning. One individual, Nick, thinks about a way of getting out of jury duty. He tries to do so by making them think he's a criminal and not some ordinary person. "Nick: I'm going to tell the judge that I'm a felon. He won't even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The jury is sent to a hot, crowded room to deliberate. Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.” Only one juror votes “not guilty.” That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8 is the protagonist of the play. As the tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury. And slowly but surely, Juror #8 guides the others toward a verdict of “Not Guilty.”…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, juror 10 is a loud mouthed, racist bigot. He scolds people he doesn’t agree with and a low opinion of people living in slum areas. Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision from the moment he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste any time debating on whether the defendant is guilty. His prejudice comes from the fact he used to live in the “slums” and considers people like the defendant to be “trash”. This is established when he states “well take a look at them…you can’t believe a word they say…they act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone. (59) This man is very…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his play, Rose critiques the oppressive and discriminative environment of McCarthyist America, exploring the way some jurors use the power of their personality to attempt to sway others to share their point of view. Indeed, the 8th juror is aware of the effects and dangers of peer pressure and this is illustrated through his request to have the second (and possibly the most important vote) taken as an anonymous ballot (p.18) At various moments in the play, the 10th, 3rd and 7th jurors do try to sway the vote to ‘guilty’ through the use of intimidation rather than argument. What can be interpreted is another clear message conveyed by Rose through his play is that this type of intimidation will ultimately be unsuccessful. Logic and reason do win out over endemic prejudice, but what the play also illustrates is that for this to occur, there must be voices who are prepared to hold true to their convictions. This is clearly portrayed through the contrast between the “[interrupting]” and “[shouting]” of jurors 10 and 3 and the “[calm]” and reflective “[pauses]” of juror…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Angriest Juror

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The play is inspired by Reginald Rose’s own experience of jury duty on a manslaughter case in New York City.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This purpose of this paper is to demonstrate Donald Trump’s progression to the successful business executive and analyze the different personality factors that played a role in getting him to the position he is presently in. The points in this paper will extrapolate relations from psychodynamic, behavioural, and interpersonal psychological theories to highlight Trump’s aggressive tendencies, his grandiose ambitions, and leadership qualities, and explain why Trump is who he is. Firstly, an in-depth examination of Trump’s autobiographies, documentaries, and articles will be conducted in order to bring insight to his life experiences, and his relationship with his father. Secondly, the paper will analyze Trump’s experiences through the perspective of Adler’s superiority complex, Bandura’s social learning theory, as well as the interpersonal theories of personality to assist in understanding why Trump functions the way he does. Thirdly, the paper will emphasize the benefits of the three aforementioned perspectives and how they are advantageous in dissecting Mr. Trump’s personality traits. Lastly, the paper will briefly mention the limitations of the three theories in representing the characteristics of Mr. Trump.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    consideration. He is surprised when the jury takes longer than usual to decide on the verdict.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) also enables certain groups of citizens to be exempt from jury service such as members of the clergy and those in full time care of a sick, infirm or disabled person, meaning that often, a jury is composed mainly of senior and unemployed citizens, which is not a true representation of the different demographics of the community, as well as it’s standards. Therefore, the law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries, as it allows an accused to be judged by their peers, however, these standards may also be narrowed down due to the ability of certain citizens to opt…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juror 10 is clearly motivated by his prejudice. He uses his intolerance to determine his vote for the accused defendant. For instance, in the beginning of Act I, Juror 10 haphazardly said, “ Look at the kind of people they are, you know them,” (13) without even digging deep into the case. It is quite obvious that Juror 10 is generating an “opinion” of the defendant based on the color of his skin and his background. He does not refer to them as regular people, but as “they” and “them” on certain pages. In the courtroom though, no juror is to have any judgments, they are supposed to bring the facts to the table, not their opinions. Juror 10’s outlook of the defendant is blinding him from thinking of any reasonable doubt. Further more, when Juror 10 said, “…I lived among em’ all my life, you can’t believe a word they say. You know that,” he yet again was referring to the defendant’s people as “em” and “they”. You can clearly infer that while Juror 10 was living amongst them, he must have experienced or witnessed situations which has caused him to have judgments on these specific people. These same judgments he brings to the courtroom just add difficulty into solving the case. Following Juror 10’s views further, when Juror 5 was explaining how the person who did stab the father was…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is a play about a young boy on trial for murdering his father. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. The jury men are very aware of this fact, most are perfectly fine with sending this boy to die as one man searches for the empathy of his jury peers. One by one the jury begins to sway toward the not guilty plea, as every fact thrown into conversation gets disproved. Now, one lone juror faces not the pressure of his peers but the pressure of his emotional attachment to the case to see that the boy be punished. This finally leads to Juror #3’s inevitable surrender of not guilty.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juror’s recognized and valued that they were participating in a key pillar of democracy, a fair and unbiased jury. Juror #11 mentions the importance of this, saying to the jury that “This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are…ummmm… what is the word… Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his critically thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son. He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is just punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the vote count; he “looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table” … (thundering) All right” (30).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every American that has registered to vote or has a drivers license can at any time be called to serve on a jury. There are mixed feelings about being called for duty. Some Americans see it as a nuisance that will disrupt their lives. Others see it as an opportunity to serve their country. Being called to serve, and actually serving is two different matters. A jury is ultimately selected by the judge, prosecutor and defending attorney. How they are they picked? How are they released? Maybe this paper will answer a few of these questions.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics