Non Religious Activism Research Paper

In the everyday parts of human lives, we constantly argue and debate against ourselves. These arguments can consist of attacks against new tax bills, fights for social inequality, and much more. People who respond to authoritative ideals are known as activists. Many significant activists over the past century tend to have some religious background in their fight. Some examples include Malcolm X with the Nation of Islam, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel with Jewish Mysticism, Yuri Kochiyama with Catholicism, and finally Martin Luther King Jr. with Christianity. All of these leaders had a successful revolution. In other words, they were able to convey their message by effectively justifying themselves with religion. Now with many important figures listed here, we aren’t able to identify as many non-religious activists. This begs the big question whether religion is needed for activism to occur successfully, in the modern day, and what is the relationship between the two? Although difficult to answer, activism has shown that it doesn’t need religion to make successful revolutions. However, with the correct justification, it is shown that religion can be a very helpful tool in such successful revolutions.

Before delving into this argument it’s important to target the elephants in the room. Many who claim that religious justification tends to always lead to a successful revolution exclude many important factors. Many of the most obvious examples brought up as support
But the questions remains: What is the relationship between religion and activism? Religion can cause activism but activism isn’t always caused by religion. We see this through all our modern examples. At the end of the day successful activism depends on the people to make the action. Religion can be a great base but without the efforts of many revolutionaries, the world will not be where it’s