Normative Effect Of Breaking Social Norms
Contextual norms can guide our behavioural conduct. We experience conformity when we allow other individuals to influence us, thus changing our behaviour and perspectives. The normative social influence theory suggests that humans feel the need to belong to groups. Over time, we have learnt that survival is more likely if we work together. However, to ensure order, we must share common norms and values. Due to this, we learn and adapt by conforming to the rules. Because of this, when be observe people’s behaviour in various events, the more we feel obliged to follow. However, this can vary in different cultures. It has been found that collectivist cultures such as Japan, generally are more concerned than in individualist cultures, such as Great
…show more content…
Without a general, shared comprehension of the standards and expectations of society, there would be disarray. Most steady social orders are regular because the greater part of the general population in them do what is normal. Despite concern for consequences, most people "do what's right" even when there are no negative consequences for themselves. Sometimes the effect of breaking a social norm is that you break a law. Laws have habitually been built up around social norms. The "Common Courtesy" has been taught in schools since the 1500’s (Santamaria and Rosenbaum, 2011). If many people did not take the acknowledged principles and laws, There is truly no way that the general society could function. There wouldn't be sufficient police to enforce the rules. Once people decided that taxes were not necessary, governments would quit working, meaning no municipal water, no power grid, and no educational system. Consequently, there is a common belief that social norms are the foundation of society. A country cannot stand without a shared understanding of expectations. On the other hand, going against those societal norms is essential to the growth of a country and its citizens. Without individual defiance to societal norms, we would not have the: women's suffrage, the end of slavery or gay marriage. Each of these things came about because people deviated from the social norms. So how do we determine which social norms are a necessity for society to function, and which hinders
Without a general, shared comprehension of the standards and expectations of society, there would be disarray. Most steady social orders are regular because the greater part of the general population in them do what is normal. Despite concern for consequences, most people "do what's right" even when there are no negative consequences for themselves. Sometimes the effect of breaking a social norm is that you break a law. Laws have habitually been built up around social norms. The "Common Courtesy" has been taught in schools since the 1500’s (Santamaria and Rosenbaum, 2011). If many people did not take the acknowledged principles and laws, There is truly no way that the general society could function. There wouldn't be sufficient police to enforce the rules. Once people decided that taxes were not necessary, governments would quit working, meaning no municipal water, no power grid, and no educational system. Consequently, there is a common belief that social norms are the foundation of society. A country cannot stand without a shared understanding of expectations. On the other hand, going against those societal norms is essential to the growth of a country and its citizens. Without individual defiance to societal norms, we would not have the: women's suffrage, the end of slavery or gay marriage. Each of these things came about because people deviated from the social norms. So how do we determine which social norms are a necessity for society to function, and which hinders