They don’t have any data or evidence to back them up, so their argument really isn’t strong. Relying on the Pope for evidence really only supports what would be considered religious reasoning- it is completely theological. Therefore this is not strong evidence when considering the big picture of the issue- one can not depend on another opinion as evidence for an argument. Although, one could argue that issues with the population could occur. Since they argued that the population would go down because everyone was going to stop having children. In an article from Slate, they show that in the past there was actually concern for how the population was growing when considering limited resources of food, clean water, and energy. If these trends continue, it was estimated that by mid-century living conditions for most of humanity would be bleak. Looking at news sets of data, the birth rate is slowing down. These threats of limited living have been diminished and researchers aren’t as concerned with how much we will have to exploit the planet. The article attributes much of this to education. With evidence like this, it really refutes the claims that was being made by the someone on the other side of the argument. By not putting such a pressure on having children, the rate balanced itself out. Additionally, it is important to point out how education has played a role in the decrease. Looking at the evidence that I provided earlier, education also had an important role in the women’s lives in the United States. One can also see how this is influencing less developed countries. Considering that the other’s argument is mostly opinion based, one could dispute their claims with factual information and discrediting their theological
They don’t have any data or evidence to back them up, so their argument really isn’t strong. Relying on the Pope for evidence really only supports what would be considered religious reasoning- it is completely theological. Therefore this is not strong evidence when considering the big picture of the issue- one can not depend on another opinion as evidence for an argument. Although, one could argue that issues with the population could occur. Since they argued that the population would go down because everyone was going to stop having children. In an article from Slate, they show that in the past there was actually concern for how the population was growing when considering limited resources of food, clean water, and energy. If these trends continue, it was estimated that by mid-century living conditions for most of humanity would be bleak. Looking at news sets of data, the birth rate is slowing down. These threats of limited living have been diminished and researchers aren’t as concerned with how much we will have to exploit the planet. The article attributes much of this to education. With evidence like this, it really refutes the claims that was being made by the someone on the other side of the argument. By not putting such a pressure on having children, the rate balanced itself out. Additionally, it is important to point out how education has played a role in the decrease. Looking at the evidence that I provided earlier, education also had an important role in the women’s lives in the United States. One can also see how this is influencing less developed countries. Considering that the other’s argument is mostly opinion based, one could dispute their claims with factual information and discrediting their theological