The next thing to be discussed is the strength of Nozick's argument. His argument mainly tells about the notion of value and society and what value can do for society, among other things. He talks about intrinsic value being something basic or relating to the ordinary. When he is going on about intrinsic value, he said that we must recall what happened in art appreciation classes and how the factors are interdependent upon each other, how the human eye is "led from place to place by forms and colors, brought to the parochial midpoint of the painting" (p. 163). He then moves on to state how the human eye is shown at how …show more content…
For a brief moment (p. 163-164), Nozick talks about science and how any amount of data and different occurrences are "brought together by being made clear of in terms of scientific laws" and says that a victory of Isaac Newton's laws "explained the motion of bodies on earth and the apparently irrelevant movements of angelic beings" and then goes on to say that a complementary aim would lead physicists to go in quest of a united field understanding to implement an explanation to construe accurately the major forces of the natural world" (p.