Various thoughts on gun regulation have been recommended to the press, local government, and people in power at the federal level. Most of which are quickly rejected as they are expected to fail or are unable to make it through Congress due to inside politics. An idea that has not yet been pushed through Congress is allowing all responsible citizens to carry firearms with the potential consequence of a minimum five year prison sentence along with fines if the weapon is not used by the carrier in a situation of self-defense. With those laws in place, criminals may consider alternatives before violating their next victim with a firearm. This will also help to cut down on straw-purchases of firearms.…
Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…
1999 - NRA promises Philadelphia police forces that armed felons won't " be back on the streets by the time the arresting officer got home for dinner."…
Similar to that of the Second Amendment, argument is between those who are pro-guns versus anti-gun. Pro-gunners are advocating for, not more lenient laws but simply, that the government attempts to better enforce the laws that are already in existence. Comparatively those who are questioning the validity of the Second Amendment are appealing to the government to place stricter restrictions on the ownership and distribution of guns. Those who are pro-gun are supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the United States, whose arguments, based in the right to “freedom” as according to the Second Amendment, are directly hindering the progress of gun control. The NRA claims that “there are currently more than 20,000 firearms laws in the U.S., clearly more than enough to punish criminals who misuse firearms, but the laws have to be enforced” (Braga 2001, 545). However many of these 20000 laws are restricted by others, thus making them unenforceable and furthermore, many of these laws were created with the intention to be difficult to enforce (Braga 2001, 546). The NRA has undermined many of the laws in place by the “sponsoring of legislation that undermines the ability of the ATF agents to build cases against unregulated private sellers involved in firearms trafficking” (Braga, 2001, 546). Those involved in the making of laws towards…
As the NRA said “Guns aren’t the issue, it’s racism”, and I agree with this opinion. The NRA is national rifle association and they didn’t believe that it was the Stand your ground law that got trayvon Martin killed, it was the fact that theres so much racism going around that people end up getting hurt from that. They also believe that because of Zimmerman, people with guns are all the sudden bad people. The NRA says that “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”, to emphasize that one shooting should not overshadow the fact that millions of people who own guns in the United States have never had a violent…
The 2nd Amendment, The right to bear arms was first passed on September 25, 1789 and then it was included to the 10 Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. The need of the second amendment was for the security of our States. James Madison introduced the second amendment as an opinion to provide more power to the militias.…
It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…
The nation's powerful gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, says that the 2nd Amendment gives the right to keep and bear arms, which it most certainly says. This right is privileged and for those millions of people who choose to own guns either for safety or personal use. The NRA also believes that human behavior defects cannot be changed by a simple regulation of gun laws. They also state that gun laws would not have been able to stop most addicted killers from acting out. The goal of most members in the association is to educate people about guns. The association is willing to teach proper usage of guns to those thinking of getting or those that already have a gun. They think that this training could help reduce some of the tragedies involving guns including: hunting…
-The National Rifle Association goes to great lengths (and spends a huge sum of money) to defend the right to bear arms. It is opposed to virtually every form of gun control, including restrictions on owning assault weapons, retention of databases of gun…
Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…
The fact that over 40% of households in the United States own a gun is terrifying. Despite the fact that owning a gun for the self-defense purpose is a human right, a lot of speculations and debate on the same is still contentious. Although a lot of efforts have previously been dedicated to ensuring policies are put in place, the problem related to the problem still exists. For many years, the congress has tried to institute gun control policies that do not entitle criminals to own guns in vain. In this respect, a need for effective gun licensing and ownership regulations is required.…
In the wake of multiple shootings such as the theatre shooting in Aurora, Colorado, should U.S. gun control laws be reformed, or would that result in the violation of constitutional rights? From the day the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was adopted on December 15, 1791, giving U.S. citizens the right to carry firearms, the issue of gun control has been the subject of many debates. And the effects of more strictly regulated Gun control would be detrimental to our society. Gun control is unreasonable for the following reasons: 1) the right to own and carry weapons is granted by the Constitution and upheld by the Supreme Court, 2) the majority of U.S. gun owners…
The NRA does have some good reasoning about it. “In a country where a large number of criminals are armed, denying a citizen the right to gun ownership makes him vulnerable” (Xaxx). This is true, but, how would that make us any safer. Suddenly everybody would have guns, criminals and law abiding citizens, either way the rate of murders or injury will increase because it was by use of guns. I do respect the concept of the NRA, of trying to protect our rights, but the bigger picture should be, trying to protect people from harm. If guns were in the possession of…
The debate over people being allowed to carry guns has been going on for a long time. The real debate should be whether or not these laws are really reducing or increasing violent crimes in America today. According to the website, Gunowners.org, an individual can purchase any firearm from a federal, firearms licensee (FFL) in another state by going to his place of business(Gun). The right to keep and bear arms is addressed in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Federal gun laws are enforced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They have done a really good job in the past. In my opinion, these gun laws aren’t reducing…
Gun ownership is constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which concerns the right to bear arms. However, it does not mean that anyone can simply walk into a store and purchase a gun and that is all there is to it. Federal law sets the minimum standards for firearm regulation in the United States, but individual states have their own laws, some of which provide further restriction, others which are more lenient (Masters). There are many reasons why Americans are against gun control in their country and why they feel it is something they should be entitled to. Owning a gun is part of the American consciousness, it is part of who Americans are because it is guaranteed by the Constitution and therefore it is a birthright, many believe that firearm ownership by law abiding citizens can reduce crimes, and it provides American with the right to individual…