Preview

Nuclear Waste Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1803 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Waste Research Paper
1. Environmental impacts of nuclear waste.
Nuclear waste or radioactive waste is the residue of nuclear reactors, nuclear researches, nuclear projects and nuclear bomb reaction. Nuclear wastes, also known as spent fuel, are dangerously radioactive and could exist for thousands of years. The release of nuclear waste from its reactor could easily cause a lot of diseases like acute radiation sickness.
The injection of nuclear waste to underground water causes water pollution and could contribute to extensive contamination of large marine areas. Some of these nuclear wastes injected to underground water could seep through and mix with underground water supplies used for drinking. Some pollutants or nuclear wastes have already penetrated underground water supplies of Florida, Texas, Ohio, and Oklahoma. Also, there was intentional dumping of nuclear waste done by the Soviets into the Techa River in 1949. It caused the people of Mayak yearly dose of 350 rems, an estimated amount of one hundred twenty-four thousand of people were affected by the radiation from the nuclear waste thrown to the Techa River. The radiation that affected the people of Mayak did also spread out
…show more content…
It costs between three to five billion dollars for building a nuclear power plant. More money could be spent for the security of these nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants could be a good target for terrorist. Nuclear power plants could be used to control electricity supply and may be intentionally initialize a core meltdown that could devastate a lot of people. Uranium that is needed for processing of nuclear energy could be depleted. Uranium is not a renewable and because of the use of nuclear power plants, uranium could be depleted faster. Depending on the actual demand for uranium, uranium could be depleted in 30 to 60 years, and after that nuclear power plants will stop operating or would need to find an alternative for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Richard A. Muller, an awardee of the MacArthur Fellowship and physics professor at UC Berkley, states in his 2008 essay “Nuclear Waste”, that Americans and the rest of the world are overly concerned with radioactive debris and the possibility of nuclear contamination. Muller first brings to light the most common fears of storing nuclear waste; volcanic activity in the Yucca Mountains, the area where the waste is stored, and the possibility of radioactive particles contaminating the water supply. Muller then goes on to entertain opposing viewpoints on how the waste should be disposed of. Muller then goes on to support his own claim by providing statistical data and explanations of radioactive…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plant owners spend numerous amounts of money to produce nuclear energy to power houses. Mining the uranium to build and run the plant costs millions of dollars alone. That’s not even counting the many workers it takes to run the plant, and the process itself. The owners of the plant have failed to auction it off 3 times over the course of 3 years. The plant takes way too…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, nuclear reaction can generate radioactive waste. These wastes are very dangerous, and have very high radiation. Moreover, radioactive waste is hard to recycle and store. Radioactive waste are usually buried in the deep ground or seabed. Not only such, these wastes are hard to degrade. For example, uranium-235 needs 7 hundred million years to degrade.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear waste is dangerous just about anyone knows that. But is it really that dangerous or is it simply overstated? The answer to this question is a heated debate that involves everybody from politicians pushing for policy they don’t really understand to scientists who are trying to understand it to the public who take everything they hear as the truth. Honestly, I don’t even know if I can iron out the edges of this frenzied debate. Everyone, and that includes me, has their own perspective of the issue of nuclear waste, and their own idea of what to do about it.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weapons proliferation: o Enrichment of reactor-­‐grade uranium can be weapons grade o Reprocessing more efficient but plutonium useful for nuclear weapons o Disposal pools and dry casks susceptible to attack 3.) Safety: once “glamorous reactors” now dreaded • Three-­‐Mile Island (1979 4.) Storage of radioactive wastes o Need to store and secure spent nuclear fuel for 10,000 to 250,000 years!…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chernobyl Research Paper

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This article goes further in depth by using an "examination of the casualties and medical problems that resulted from the Chernobyl nuclear explosion" to reveal the political and scientific viewpoints. It discusses the controversy surrounding the death toll and the impact of the radioactivity on the nation's water supply.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good example is dated back to war and the great nuclear bombs. “The "Little Boy" bomb detonated 1,670 feet (509 meters) above Hiroshima and left only the frames of a few reinforced concrete buildings standing in the mile radius around Ground Zero, according to a 1980 Defense Nuclear Agency report. Firestorms destroyed everything within a 4.4-mile radius (7 kilometers) of the blast”- (Stephanie Pappas). Its half-life is also 4.5 billion years and is constantly decaying because it is naturally radioactive making it have an unstable nucleus causing the constant state of decay. Another interesting fact about Uranium is that is was named after Uranus when it was discovered. Uranium is also used to color glass, of course with a more controlled quantity. “According to Lenntech, all humans and animals are naturally exposed to minute amounts of uranium from food, water, soil and air. For the most part, the general population can safely ignore the amounts that are ingested, except if they live near hazardous waste sites, mines, or if crops are grown in contaminated soil or watered with contaminated water.”- (Stephanie Pappas). So literally uranium is all over the place for around us to even inside…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Waste

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear waste is a radioactive waste that is dangerous, and a fair percentage of people would agree on this topic. However, is it really dangerous or is it just harmful to an extent? In society, many debates are held over trying to prove to the world that this substance is harmful. In the essay, “Nuclear Waste,” Muller states clearly that he sides with the anti-nuke of the debate and how he pinpoints the facts of nuclear waste with great persuasion. Yet, it is uncertain whether Muller clearly has a good argument and/or answers the questions that many people linger to know.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Residual waste from nuclear energy is an inevitable side-effect of fission. Each radioactive isotope has a half life, which is the specific amount of time that it takes an isotope to decay to half of its original mass. This means that while technically each isotope will exponentially decay, the time it…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Waste

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In one of his lectures “Nuclear Waste” Richard A. Muller, discussing the nuclear waste problem, scientists’ attempts to find the solution, and the public’s fear around it, gives the audience his personal evaluation. He makes a point that since the nuclear waste is here, we have to store it and storing at Yucca Mountain is not the worst option, because the dangers of storing it there is smaller than the dangers of not doing so. This lecture makes me recall the tragic event in my country when one of the nuclear reactors exploded at Chernobyl nuclear plant in 1986. The consequences of this accident were and still are terrible for people and the environment in Ukraine and in surrounding countries. Furthermore, recent consequences of earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan at Fukushima nuclear plant increase the importance of the scientific debate against nuclear power, and force people around the world to come out against the nuclear power. People using nuclear power cannot control the whole process of its generation, as well as they do not know what to do with nuclear waste. Since we have nuclear waste, we are facing the necessity of disposing it. Muller notes that storing nuclear waste will not seem such unacceptable if we evaluate the danger of waste storage in comparison with two other dangers: the danger of the uranium originally mined, and the danger of the natural uranium left in the soil. The point is that we cannot guarantee the absolute security, but even the nature cannot; and the possible waste leakage is not a kind of danger that cannot be minimized.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fukushima Research Paper

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In March 2011, a 9.1 magnitude earthquake hit the pacific coast of Japan, generating up to 133ft tall tsunami waves, which obliterated everything up to 6 mi. inland. According to the NPA (National Police Agency) of Japan, 24, 656 people were affected by this catastrophe, which include the deceased, injured, and missing. The tsunami also affected three of the six nuclear reactors of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant causing leakage of radioactive material. Many workers and even civilians worked hard to contain the harmful material for it to stop contamination in other areas, but it already spread. A The Associated Press news writer states, “The massive amount of radioactive water is among the most pressing…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second reason, nuclear power plant is one of the most devastating accidents a place could have; these plants cannot guarantee us safeness that we needed. Just like Chernobyl, it all began with an accident, but what its effect, the misery of the people living in Chernobyl. Now, the place is like a ghost town, lifeless. Danger of exposing to radioisotopes or harmful rays that are emitted from the exploded reactor 4of the plant; people leave the place for safety. If this plant would be here in our country and have also, not hoping, an accident, maybe, just maybe, Philippines will be dead in all…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays