“The important question is how nudges relate to the personal autonomy of the nudgee” (Mills 2013, p. 30). Felsen et al. suggest that this is a key ethical issue as intentionally attempting to influence individuals choices, even as in the case of nudge when it is for their own benefit, has the potential to infringe upon autonomy (2013, p.202). There is a common desire among people to protect their autonomous decision making, and research done by Felsen et al. supports this …show more content…
One of the key arguments against the introduction of this policy is that it would impact negatively on our autonomy, however the author has attempted to dispel this fear. The author provided a working definition of both autonomy and nudge to ensure that there was no ambiguity around the topics being discussed. The author then demonstrated the possible areas in which autonomy would be reduced by nudging. By highlighting the external circumstances and internal biases which impact and reduce our autonomy when making authentic decisions, the author demonstrated that nudge is no worse than any pre-existing human conditions. In fact as it attempts to counterbalance these blunders in judgement and enhance authentic decision making, nudge might be understood as increasing our autonomy. The author also discussed the importance of maintaining the choice set within the process of nudge and the way in which it attempts to rationally persuade individuals. Rational persuasion can not be seen as a loss of autonomy and as such neither can nudge. In conclusion, the author has attempted in this essay to counter arguments that the introduction of nudge policies within society would negatively impact the autonomy of its