Nuremberg Trials Role In Resolving The Holocaust

The Holocaust, a systematic, state-sponsored execution of more than nine million people, the majority of which were the five billion ‘racially inferior’ Jews, as an era of terror, misery, and death, and was resolved through a number of efforts by the Allies after World War II, the primary resolution being the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials played the greatest role in resolving the Holocaust through their effective dispensing of justice, successful attempt at neutralizing as much remaining animosity between the victims and the perpetrators as possible, and instilling remorse in the alleged criminals, as opposed to the liberation of survivors, or monetary reparations made by guilty organizations, which just halted the imminent conflict.
The Nuremberg Trials were held
The common definition in the minds of the common population, is essentially an idiom that dates back to the mid-16th century; tip for tap. If you do something wrong, karma will come back and punish you for it. The trials took on the responsibility of dishing out karma to the criminals, through fair trials and sentencing based on the depth of the crime. If the trials had severely adhered to ‘tip for tap’, most of the criminals arrested would have been executed. However, a massacre of all those involved was not part of the regime of the Allies, as their motives far exceeded the basic ‘eye for an eye’. If they had just executed the whole lot of criminals, they would be no better than Hitler, or any other Nazi, or Nazi supporter- because cold-hearted murder was the philosophy that the Allies were trying to dissuade from the population. These trials sent a major signal to the population regarding the new world views on racism and discrimination, and any discrepancies in sentencing could have possibly dangerous outcomes. Ergo, the Allies had to take both justice, and public reaction to sentencing, as well as many other underlying purposes into account, when sentencing the