Oklahoma Bombing Tragedy

When tragedy strikes, it is not uncommon for a well revered figure to respond to such an event as common people look up to them for guidance. Robert F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton are no exceptions, while the initial is addressing the sudden assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and the latter concerning towards The 1995 Oklahoma Bombing, both are responding towards tragic loss and the aftermath that should follow. In their speeches, “A Eulogy For Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” and “Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address,” Robert F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton enhance their claims by appealing towards an emotional appeal, a logical appeal, and personal connection in order to insist that we must try to get over the loved ones that have passed away and continue their legacy through compassion, not hate, but Kennedy utilizes rational reasons more while Clinton incorporates more moving personally touching words in order to impact their audiences. Both Clinton and Kennedy are implementing credibility towards themselves when enriching their speeches and justifying why their input matters, however, they present this in different ways
Individuals as well as entire populations that bear malice towards one another is increasing and it is inevitable that harmful conflicts will occur, which is not beneficial to anyone whatsoever. Robert F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton both urge this to dramatic levels within their speeches, coming to utilize emotional appeal, logical appeal, and personal connection in order to effectively present these ideas towards their audiences. As Bill Clinton quoted within his Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address, “As St. Paul admonished us, Let us ‘not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with