Preview

On Liberty of Thought and Discussion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Liberty of Thought and Discussion
Thought and Discussion: On Liberty of Thoughts and Discussion

By: Pamela Noble

For: Professor Brad Bell
Ethics and Media, The Arts and Society

Excelsior College

August 11, 2013

Thoughts and Discussion: On the Liberty of Thought and Discussion
Abstract
In the second chapter of John Stuart Mill’s essay, On Liberty, Mill presents reasons why he believes silencing people 's opinions, even if there is only one person with a particular opinion, impedes the ability of people to make truly informed decisions. Mill’s argument, however, assumes that the goal is always the search for truth and, thus, necessitates the need for liberty of thought and discussion. Consequently, in this second chapter, Mill expounds upon his belief in the autonomy of the individual in the development of opinion and quest for truth. Mill also reiterates his belief in the autonomy of government and refutes the idea that government should adhere to popular opinion. Furthermore, Mill emphasizes the point that government should never prohibit victimless free expression, even if popular public opinion deems it necessary. Thus, in the ongoing search for truth, Mill encourages the notion that liberty in thought and discussion of all peoples is vital because the majority opinion is not guaranteed to be correct.
Mill (1869), in On Liberty and Discussion, argues that freedom of thought and speech are essential in keeping the majority from silencing the minority because "we can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false opinion." Consequently, since majority opinion can be wrong for such has no true authority and no absolute certainty, Mill further asserts that government should not act at the beckon call of the majority. In addition, whether the majority opinion is right or wrong, Mill believes that the public should not have the power of coercion over their elected governing body. He argues that the government is much more ineffective and even



References: Mill, John Stuart. 1869. On Liberty of Thought and Discussion. In On Liberty (chapter II). Retrieved from www.bartleby.com/130/.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mill vs Dostoevsky

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Trans. Elizabeth Rapaport. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 1978. Print.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 was a great year for Larry Flynt, the publisher of a highly criticized magazine called, “Hustler.” This magazine was unlike any of its predictors, such as Playboy. While sexuality was on the rise, so were “new” ways to do it. Hustlers’ publisher, Larry Flynt was merely exposing what people were already doing. This does not mean that everyone had the same sexual desires as everyone else, but he did become popularized by certain “hardcore” sexually active persons. While he became a hero amongst some, there seems to have been more against what Flynt was doing. It has been documented that even some of his staff did not agree, saying that he was making men out to be rapists, and making comparisons to men being like “stud bulls,” wanting to have sex with “everything in sight.”…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Maldwyn A.Jones, "The Limits of Liberty - American History 1607-1992" 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, 1995.…

    • 2244 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also presents the idea that “whatever the risks, the people must be informed, especially on those matters relating to the government” (110). Mill would first agree that people must be informed and ideas must not be suppressed due to those ideas potentially being true. However, Mill would also be concerned with Fuller’s statement “whatever the risks.” This is because Mill emphasizes the idea that opinion needs to be debated. When people are being given information through newspapers or other resources as Fuller uses as examples, particularly those containing political opinion, it is a one-sided conversation. People’s ideas may not be 100% true because they may not understand their opinion whole-heartedly, or the opinion is weakened without a discussion taking place. As said in Mill’s third point, a misunderstanding of the opinion can lead to serious mistakes. This was evident in Fuller’s chapter when the government officials did not want to give up their franking privileges, and postal monetary deficits were created…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill perceives only one instance in which society is justified in interfering with or limiting the freedoms of its adult members, that being to prevent harm to others. Though Mill would…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Mill, John Stuart. Mill: The Spirit of the Age, On Liberty, The subjection of…

    • 1627 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    commonplace book unit one

    • 3073 Words
    • 8 Pages

    5. “This liberty is maintained and exercised in a way of subjection to authority; it is of the same kind of liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free.” John Winthrop, "Little Speech on Liberty" (1645), CAPCT, Vol. 1, pp. 18-19…

    • 3073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Shared Humanity

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill feels strongly about people being free to express their opinions. There are a few reasons Mill states of why it is so important to society and for shared humanity. First off it is healthy for the human mind individually. Shared humanity is about being there for others and being kind for no reason. So by listening and helping and individual feel great mentally, it shows that is important to shared humanity. If people were not to listen or deny people of their right to express their…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill, John S. "Liberty of Thought and Discussion." American Government. Comp. Peter Woll. New York: Longman, 2002. 98-103.…

    • 4864 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Supreme Moral Principle

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill on the other hand believed that majority rules basically. He believes that some actions are justified on utilitarian grounds, utilitarianism. If one person has to suffer to entertain or please multiple others, so be it.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This results in Mill’s claim that a Government’s sole responsibility is to represent the interests of its people: “Those interests, I contend, authorize the subjection of individual spontaneity to external control only in respect to those actions of each which concern the interest of other people” (On Liberty 139). He claims that there are certain situations where it is better to have legal remedies than condemning people morally. In these instances he believes Government to be beneficial to society as it promotes the higher good of freedom. Furthermore, he asserts that laws should be made to protect people from engaging in actions that have been tried since the beginning of time and have proven to be harmful (On Liberty 141).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays