Preview

Mill Shared Humanity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mill Shared Humanity
Shared Humanity is so important to society, without it, society would not be able to function properly. Through course we have looked over multiple authors works which pertain to how society functions along with what rights people have and what it means to be liberal. The two authors we have went over which I feel did a great job explaining how in a sense shared humanity is around us and the flaws of society which can threaten our sense of shared humanity. Mill and Bandes were the two authors who stuck out to me the most, even though there were other contenders. Both of the authors covered so much information which could pertain to how shared humanity can be threated, however, both authors have talked about two things which I feel is the greatest …show more content…
The opposite of what Mill states is what the biggest threat is, not being open to opinions and being closed minded. Bandes on the other hand talks about more serious things such as revenge, but that is not the greatest threat to shared humanity Bandes talks about. Disgust is the greatest threat, because it can take a little from multiple topics Bandes talks about, including revenge which make up the whole of disgust. Disgust is such a sting feeling that is comprised by multiple other feelings it could be the one which poses the greatest threat to shared humanity. Mill feels strongly about people being free to express their opinions. There are a few reasons Mill states of why it is so important to society and for shared humanity. First off it is healthy for the human mind individually. Shared humanity is about being there for others and being kind for no reason. So by listening and helping and individual feel great mentally, it shows that is important to shared humanity. If people were not to listen or deny people of their right to express their …show more content…
Unfortunately there are many possible threats to shared humanity which could possibly put an end to it. Luckily Mill stresses how important it is to listen to people and their thoughts, their opinions matter and Mill does a great job explain why. Without the accepting opinions or even giving them a chance can possible harm the unspoken agreement of shared humanity. Bandes also talked about how disgust plays an enormous role in society, not a positive role unfortunately. Disgust usually leads to people or groups getting abused in some sort of way because the disgust uses emotions which can cloud judgment. Luckily time has shown through the centuries shared humanity is still around, and it appears to be staying even with everything working against

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the 14th Dalai Lama wrote in his book Beyond Religion: Ethics for a Whole World, ¨Recognizing our shared humanity and our biological nature as beings whose happiness is dependent on others, we learn to open our hearts, and in doing so we gain a sense of purpose and connection with those around us¨ (H.H. Dalai Lama 73). Thus, when one performs an act that opens his heart and connects him to the world around him, he is sharing his humanity. People must understand the necessity of shared humanity in their lives because the aspects it encompasses are what distinguish them as human beings. In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck demonstrates the validity of humans being able to share their humanity through love and sacrifice.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sanders' contends in his essay that American society has molded Americans into embracing anonymity and abandoning the "common life" and the social interaction that goes along with it. I completely agree with Sanders on this issue. It is truly a shame that the rate at which society is decomposing has grown so high. At many times throughout my young life I have already felt deeply disturbed by the lengths to which greed, envy, lust, and temptation drive so many of our nations individuals. Corruption infests the ranks of our country's leadership, and a profound lack of moral values has infected our younger generations.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill’s first argument is that suppressed opinion has the possibility of being true, which is why no idea can be dismissed. Mill’s second argument is that people will not fully understand their own opinion if it is not debated. He claims in paragraph 21 that even if popular opinion is true, if it is not debated, it becomes “dead dogma.” This is because a person needs to be able to respond appropriately to objections about their…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Community, Identity, Stability” (1): this is what a perfect society is in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. But having stability is no easy task, especially when humanistic and biblical morals collide; a stable society is possible but only with the sacrifice of one or the other. This stable society is still fragile though. Creating a stable society with humanistic morals requires the complete destruction of biblical morals and the idolization of earthly obsessions. This destruction redefines what beauty is from a biblical standpoint to a humanistic point of view. In most developed societies today we can see the drive for change from biblical moral foundations to more humanistic morals. This can also be seen in the book 1984 written by George Orwell. Complete societal stability based on humanistic beliefs is achievable, but it requires the…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can a society based on hate survive? I believe that a society solely based on hate can survive. If someone who is so influential can control every aspect of one's life, then controlling people with hate is not too far out of the box. Hate crimes have been around since the 1960’s and they do not show any signs of stopping anytime soon.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthem English Paper

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Individuality is the enemy. This is what the citizens in the book Anthem were born and forced to believe. The human kind that lives in this society repeats a chant to their selves. “We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, one, individual, and forever.” (Rand 19) They need to remember to always be the same. There’s only one choice, and one choice only: agree. Everybody thinks the same so all you can do is agree, not disagree. The government they have states and drills in the citizens minds since they were born that being along is wrong.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The consequences of mill’s subordination can be felt. These can be, First, someone my harm others by violating their rights and freedom and also interfering with their action. For example if the person is unable to have a control over his spending, or not able to pay her debts or not able to support the children, then they can be condemned or punished. But it may be good to punish them for not supporting their children or unable to clear the debts but it is not good to punish them for not controlling their budget. On the other hand it may lead to exploitation of individual rights as seen in ancient Romans used slaves as workers.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An excerpt from Exploring Ethics, best exemplifies the comparison from Mill and Kant. Kant's ethical system concentrates exclusively on the reason for an action and does not take into account its results, Mill's system focuses only on consequences. Mill's explained "that this is the singularity is the basis in which you use to judge morality, with those being morally right being those that will manufacture the most happiness because in the end all humans seek happiness above everything else." He also argued that fame, money, and virtue could not replace happiness but could be used to obtain it. Mill’s believed that happiness is the guiding arch that drives…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We see that hate throughout the earth's history is just as abrasive now as it was back in the beginning. The phrase ‘history repeats itself’ used to seem true to me, until I realized that that the rough instances of hate never went away, they were just buried deep within our culture. Away from the surface of the news but embedded in our culture. I began to wonder if progress is even possible. It is already quite certain that we will never live in a world without oppression. There is too much glory in power for that to happen. However, I would like to live in a world where most of us can view each other as equals, regardless if we notice outward differences. It’s hard to believe that will legitimately occur after viewing films like the one we saw in class. It doesn’t matter if it has been 1000 years or just twenty years, people are still struggling to survive as a consequence of hate. The optimist in me hopes that my kin will be able to experience just a little sliver of what that is like somewhere in their…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill False Expression

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    goes so far as to argue that a false opinion contributes to the truth. A false expression should be permitted because it gives us reason to justify what we take to be the truth, so that such truths do not set into accepted dogma and prejudice that is passively inherited generation to generation. If so, these ideas, no matter how good, will not flourish, for in our passive acceptance of them, we will have failed to understand and appreciate them. Whatever way Mill's objector may argue, Mill reasons that any coercion to supress expression will suppress the truth. Mill is committed to the belief that the truth will prevail in the marketplace of ideas, which will thrive only when people can engage in free discussion.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collins adds, "Like the privileged, members of subordinate groups must also work toward replacing judgments by category with new ways of thinking and acting. Refusing to do so stifles prospects for effective coalition and social change" (Collins). The social change cannot be stifled, for a new generation must be better than this one. One should learn to love a neighbor as they love themselves. There is no man who can pick the worthy and the worthless. This planet has been given to man so that they can populate the earth and grow as a unit. When the society takes censuses, we do not collect the population as individual parts, we collect the unity of habitants. This common, but easily forgotten routine alone shows you that as a whole we are valued, not as individual…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Mill Conformity

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In On Liberty, Chapter 2: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion, Mill elaborates on free speech by saying “If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind” (On Liberty, 515). Meaning that if a person revolting against the conformity was to have a differing opinion than that of the conforming majority, it would be as unjust to silence that singular person as it would be to silence the entire majority. The majority may share a popular opinion, yet that does not ensure that it is right. If there is no other opinion to be regarded then the truth may never be discovered and the ‘tyranny of the majority’ will result in an overwhelming ignorance and a failure to form new ideas. Free speech must be preserved because without radical ideas the original theory will remain valid, but result in stymied progress of human nature. For example, Galileo, a now renowned scientist, was very unpopular and jailed for his opinions and discoveries because they did not conform with the ideas of the church. Without his discoveries and resilience against the majority, we would lack the knowledge about the universe and laws of…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Society plays a large role in everyday lives- it can dictate how one should think and act in as the “popular opinion”. With this idea in mind it is easy to think that thoughts and opinions are in unison within the world, yet this is not the case. A vast range of ethics and morals spread across the population of Earth there are bound to be both unanimous decisions and conflicts. The most pressing in aspects current events in countries around the world would be the argument of modernism and traditionalism. Progression in the world of today is not always met with open arms, and at times…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays