In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” ,written by Jennifer Jenkins is an article she wrote to inform people about what teenagers have done and to release her thoughts. Jennifer Jenkins is a high school teacher that has a devastating story for her own. Her sister, her brother in law, and her sister's unborn baby were killed by a teenager who just wanted to feel how it is to kill someone. As it seems this has changed her point of view for teenagers even though she was worked with teens all her life. The offender that she had to deal with was a serial killer in the making that also came from privilege. Every time that he got in trouble his parents fixed it and he did plan a lot worse crimes but after bragging to his friends he got caught.…
In the article “ On punishment and Teen killers” By Jennifer Jenkins talks about how this teenager has killed a Woman, when she was pregnant which she begged for the life of her unborn child but the teen was eager to feel how it would be to shoot someone and he right there shot her to death. Which now the teenager has been sentenced to three life sentences in prison.He is not the only one dealing with teenage killer crimes but there are about 1,300 cases nationally that have sentenced teenagers as an adult to life in prison.Therefore many people wish to lower down the offender's culpability just because of their age. In canada rarely any teens committed any crimes until 1980 were television had been introduced which affected teens.Many kids…
In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” (2011), Jenkins uses the weakest ethos when she argues, teens who commit heinous crimes should receive life without the possibility of parole, and that victims’ rights should be considered. Jenkins is a high school teacher who was a victim. In the light, she works with teenagers which gives her a small amount of credibility, but on the contrary, her sister and unborn child were murdered by an adolescent. Be as it may, this gives her a biased opinion, because she wants revenge for her family members’ death and does not care about the person who killed her family members. In addition to that bad ethos, she uses a lot of pathos in her article which, not to mention, lowers her credibility. Consequently,…
PBS’s “Second Chance Kids” film is about juveniles who commit heinous crime being giving a second chance to get out of prison and start their life over. The reason for the court creating this new law, enabling inmates that were sentenced to life without parole in prison, is to allow for the opportunity of rehabilitation of the juveniles. Sentencing a juvenile to life without parole is inhumane, because takes away any incentive for that individual to rehabilitate themselves. It is also unfair, because as a minor your brain is still developing which causes minors to act irrational or without thinking, so when a teenage commits a terrible crime that should not be able to define the rest of their life. Some commonalities all the individuals considered…
If a child commits a serious crime like murder, robbery, or arson, should they go to jail? For some time now, supreme courts point out that some juveniles who commit crimes should not go to jail. Others would argue otherwise. Someone who views an act of crime as simply an act of crime would agree that a child who commits a crime would not be a child anymore. The Supreme Court defends the juveniles attempting to justify their actions as naïve like, and that sentencing them to a life sentence without parole is unconstitutional. I believe in the minority group that argues with Supreme Court justices on why they should be sentenced to prison for long periods of time.…
Research shows that the rate at which juvenile violators of the law turn their lives around as opposed to older violators is remarkable. With the use of rehabilitation, psychological guidance, and some punishment is efficient to teenagers who are convicted of crimes. Sentencing a 12-year old to life in prison just seems morally unjust, especially when he has a high probability of turning his life around with some help.…
First, if children are not tried as adults and are released there is no telling if they will continue to do criminal acts or not. In an article by Gail Garner “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences” he says that “it is impossible at the time of sentencing for mental health professionals to predict which youngsters will fall within that majority…
Juveniles makes bad decision but it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re all bad, majority of them steal or choose a bad path. Everybody makes mistakes but doesn’t mean they all should get a punishment that makes them suffer for the rest of their life. Researches say “among them the discovery of striking changes taking place during the teen years. These findings have…
Juveniles who commit heinous crimes are capable of change, so convicting them as adults and giving them a life sentence doesn't allow them to do so. In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger states the the 79 juveniles in the US who are convicted to a life sentence, are seen as unchangeable and no one cares what becomes of them. But from personal experiences of being a former judge, Garinger had see first hand the juvenile's capacity to turn themselves around. If a juvenile were to be convicted to die in prison, they would be never be given the opportunity to show their change. They should be given an opportunity to show their growth and maturity, but life in prison denies them that. Life in prison denies these young individuals the access to…
Not everybody brought up buy the same parents. Some parents don't even look after their child, others become afraid of their kids, and there are those that are actual parents. Let's not forget that there are children out them without any kind at all. We all deserve a chance, an opportunity to change. Punishment indeed is necessary but life without parole is unnecessary since they are still immature. Help is necessary. They need help to change their ways and there mentality. They can't handle it on their own. They are young and so are their minds. At a young age they are easily manipulated by others and by their own thoughts as well. They get to the point where everything is too much for them and just make the wrong…
“The only effective way to reduce and prevent juvenile crime is to balance tough enforcement measures with targeted, effective and intervention initiatives.” Juveniles are children and children don’t know any better and obviously make mistakes. They don’t expect to be caught after committing a serious crime. Juveniles brains are not fully developed until they are 25, but young people recognize them as adults at the age of 18. About 25,000 children a year have their cases sent to adult courts instead of being tried in juvenile courts, whose convicted defendants are usually set free by the time they turn 21. Trying juveniles as adults is not beneficial for them. But it also is a crime. And crimes are crimes whether…
Juveniles deserve a second chance at succeeding. The people have to remember that the children need our help and get them focus in positive things and give them the right guidance they need to succeed. There is various ways that a kid can get back on the right path, counseling, after school programs, rehabilitation, and, a positive role model. Each of these things have they own way to get the child involved.…
¨Children who commit serious crimes still have the ability to change their lives for the better. It is now time for state and federal officials to take positive steps by enacting policies that seek to redeem children, instead of throwing them in prison for the rest of their lives.” This is a quote from David Berger, who is a Deputy District Attorney for the County of Los Angeles, California. He believes that juveniles should not be charged as adults, even if the crime they committed is considered a ´tragedy´ and is thought to be ´horrid´. But we should not try juveniles as adults for many reasons.…
The juvenile justice system has been in existence for over 100 years. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the child, not to enforce excessive punishment. The system involves children under the age of eighteen years old. There is a line between juveniles and adult offenders. Just because the offender is under the age of eighteen, does that make him or her incapable of being charged for a crime and be convicted just like an adult? This question comes to mind when a child commits a crime such as murder. Should a child be convicted and suffer the same consequences as an adult? Or should the system just accept the fact that the child does not know any better and release them? From a moral standpoint, it would not be fair to subject a child to the death penalty but it seems like the justice system outweighs many moral standpoints.…
As Stacia Tauscher once said “we worry about what a child will become tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today.” For my opinion is true, young offender population has increased of the years. Parents may be worried about their children's future instead of watching them while they’re are in their sights.…