Preview

Opposition to Roosevelt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Opposition to Roosevelt
What was the opposition to Roosevelt during his time as President between 1933 and 1945?
Opposition from the Supreme Court
Given Roosevelt’s flexible ideas on the workings of the constitution, it was perhaps inevitable that he would come into conflict with its guardian, the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had the power to declare unconstitutional: acts of state governments, the federal government or Congress. When FDR came into office, the Supreme Court was dominated by Republican judges led by Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes. Although it initially supported New Deal legislation, in 1935 the Court virtually wrecked the main reforms of the First New Deal:
1. The “sick chicken case” in May 1935 involved the Schechter Brothers, a firm of butchers in New York who were selling chickens unfit for human consumption. Prosecuted by the NIRA for breaking its codes of practice, the Schechter brothers appealed against the verdict to the Supreme Court. The Court declared that the federal government had exceeded its powers by interfering in intra-state commerce, which was a state matter. Moreover if the federal government could not prosecute individual firms for breaking NIRA codes, it followed that all of the codes themselves were unconstitutional and that the executive did not have the authority to intervene in matters that were the preserves of individual states. Most significantly, the ruling implied that the government had no power to oversee nation-wide economic affairs except in so far as they affected inter-state commerce.

2. In January 1936, in “United States vs. Butler”, also declared the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) unconstitutional for similar reasons to the Schechter case- the court felt the federal government had exceeded its power by interfering in intra-state commerce.

In a private memorandum, Roosevelt wrote that: “The decision virtually prohibits the President and Congress from the right, under modern conditions, to intervene reasonably

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    McColloch vs. Maryland was a decision constructed by The Supreme Court of the United States. Maryland undertook disrupting an operation of one of the Second Bank of the United States’ branches by striking a tax on all of the banks not authorized by Maryland. The law was identified by the court that Maryland had focused on the United States Bank. The court then allowed the Federal government to pass laws not intended to be for the Constitution’s list of expressed powers. The case that I am referring to as of right now authorized two significant principles in constitutional law. Initially, the constitution stipends implied powers to congress inclining to construct a utilitarian functional government. However, state action could likely…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Competitors were unhappy and challenged this decision. They argued that the federal government had exclusive commerce power and that power superseded state laws. They took their case to court and Livingston and Fulton responded by attempting to undercut their rivals. They would offer them franchises, which they could still control, and they would buy their boats. It…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    1. The Supreme Court had to decide if the state had power over the federal government in regulating commerce based on Article I Section 8.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Congress acted unconstitutionally by giving the Sup Ct jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the westerners trespassing on Indian lands Chief No Shirt presented his grievances to Roosevelt only for him to refuse to see him, then later on leaving Chief with a letter stating if they wish to prosper they must conform to white society. As much as the Progressive plan was to include minorities, Roosevelt symbolized “Progressive indifference”. With Roosevelts administration stacking policy over policy so whites will have control over millions of acres, Indians would then be forced to be moved on to reservations. Next, Assimilation was a strategy to tame Indians into white culture, or Daniel says the motive for assimilation “to make them as much as possible carbon copies of whites…”3. A main reason for this urgent push for assimilation…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While trying to climb out of the horrendous conditions of the Great Depression, the American people were fed up with their Republican President Herbert Hoover. They were looking for someone to fix America. People were starving to death, homeless, jobless, and the list of monstrosities goes on and on. A Democrat named Franklin Delano Roosevelt promised the fix American’s were looking for and ran on three R’s: relief, recovery, and reform. He would be elected four times in a row over the next 12 years; creating several alphabet agencies that would change America forever.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision, in 1859, sided with federal law stating that states do not have the ability to overrule federal law; that the Constitution was written as the supreme law of the land. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s decision denied the right of state’s courts to interfere in federal cases, prohibited states from releasing federal prisoners on a writ of habeas corpus, and upheld constitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Act.3 Taney cited in his decision, “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper to carry into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.”4 This is important because it limited the rights of the state governments. Taney’s decision strengthened the federal government and weakened the state governments. His decision also strengthened the judicial branch further following in the footsteps of John…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Jewish anywhere in the world was hard in the 1930s and 40s. Almost all know about German jewish hardship, the systematic slaughter of millions of jews in death camps across Hitler’s empire, but what many do not understand is that anti-semitism was incredibly strong in the United States as well. However, in a time when almost none stood by their side, Franklin Delano Roosevelt seemed the only world leader who cared. However, his cabinet did not share his welcoming attitude, and attempted to sabotage him. Although Roosevelt demonstrated that he did care about saving the Jews, his administration perpetrated systematic denial of Jewish entry to the country. Because he did not do enough to investigate this until it was too late, he is…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wickard Vs Filiburn Essay

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The founding fathers of The United States of America intended for this to be a country of freedoms, giving supreme power to the states. The federal government was intended to be the governing blanket, keeping all states within their reasonable powers and to ensure that each individual state does not encroach upon the powers of their neighboring states. I believe that the Supreme Court’s decision in Wickard v. Filburn, which enforced the Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938, did not follow in the spirit of federalism as our founding fathers intended. The Commerce Clause oversteps the boundaries that were intended to be in place for the federal government to follow. Some of the federalist and antifederalist papers, written by our founding fathers, addressed these issues to a certain extent, helping…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr Supreme Court Packing

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of three terms, starting in 1934, the Supreme Court struck down a large part of the Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, provoking a continuing constitutional crisis. President Roosevelt naturally criticized the Court on a number of occasions, the last time in June of 1936; but because of the negative response from Congress and members of the media in those instances, he said nothing about the Court during the 1936 presidential campaign. Supporters of the New Deal proposed a variety of ways of bringing the Court into line with their program, including statutes to require an extraordinary majority of justices to strike down a law, constitutional amendments to mandate retirement at 70 or 75, and so on (Ross 1994, Stephenson 1998). During the 1936 election, Governor Landon and other Republicans attempted to use the Court’s recalcitrance to portray Roosevelt and the Democrats as enemies of the Constitution, liberty, and property. Notwithstanding the barrage of criticism, Roosevelt and the Democrats won a massive landslide in 1936, with the President taking all but two states in the Electoral College and Democrats controlling all but sixteen seats in the Senate and eighty in the House.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt Presidency

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To what extent did the role of the federal government change under President Theodore Roosevelt in regard to TWO of the following: Labor, Trusts, Conservation, World affairs…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011). Retrieved from thecocklebur.com Academic database .…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the progressive era, presidents Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, and Woodrow Wilson were often known as the “Progressive Presidents.” President Theodore Roosevelt, in 1908, very easily could’ve won the presidential election, but in 1904 he made a big promise not to run for a second term as president. He didn’t want to just give up control, so he chose the next president. He chose his successor, President Howard Taft to become the next president. He was a 350 pound Secretary of War and he was chosen in 1908 to become the Republican candidate. President Taft was a progressive president that the other past presidents would thought would be easy to control him.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to pbs.org, Theodore Roosevelt’s strong approach to foreign policy began during his term as Assistant Secretary of the Navy under President William McKinley. He advocated war against Spain and mobilized the Navy while his boss was away. When the U.S. declared war on Spain, Roosevelt assembled the Rough Riders and led the First Volunteer Cavalry to victory on Cuba's San Juan Hill in 1898.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Campaign Finance Reform

    • 3014 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Gitelson, A., Dudley, R., and Dubnick, M. (2004), American Government (7th Ed) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company…

    • 3014 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays