Preview

Henderson V. United States of America

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1224 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henderson V. United States of America
Henderson v. United States of America: The Weight of and Wait for Rehabilitation
Robert C. Edgar
Palm Beach State College
Professor Maclachlan, Ph.D.
POS 1041, 161889

Henderson v. United States of America: The Weight of and Wait for Rehabilitation
Armarcion D. Henderson was a felon…a felon with a problem of substance abuse. On June 2, 2010, having being found guilty on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm, the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana gave an upward deviation from the guidelines of sentencing of 60 months, the norm being 33-41 months, with reasoning solely attributable to the cause of rehabilitation. The court wanted to ensure that Henderson received the proper post-sentencing rehabilitation for his vice. Mr. Henderson at the time had no objection. On June 10, 2010, slightly more than a week of pondering the close to double term, Henderson petitioned the court, asking for a correction on a clear error – the length of his sentence. On July 30, 2010, the district court denies the motion to correct the sentence for clear error. It should be noted that no such law clearly defined the role of rehabilitation with regard to sentencing of the accused.
A U.S. Supreme Court case involving the almost exact scenario, Tapia v. United States, on June 16, 2011, held the following: “a court may not impose or lengthen a prison sentence to enable an offender to complete a treatment program or otherwise to promote rehabilitation.” Id. at 2393; see also id. at 2385 (“The Sentencing Reform Act precludes federal courts from imposing or lengthening a prison term in order to promote a criminal defendant’s rehabilitation”). (11). This now clarified the otherwise murky law regarding rehabilitation with regard to sentence and gave new life to Henderson’s cause. On July 8, 2011, Henderson filed an appeal to the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, before circuit judges, Smith, Southwick, and Graves. His



References: Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011). Retrieved from thecocklebur.com Academic database . Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from americanbar.org Academic database . Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf> O’Connor, Karen, Saboto, Larry J., and Yanus, Alixandra B.(2009) Essentials of American Government: Roots and Reform New York City: Pearson Education, Inc.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This appears to be a mine-run case and not the unusual case outside the heartland. Certainly, Funk is not the unusually sympathetic and repentant figure depicted in Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 600-02, and the district court recognized as much. Funk, 477 F.3d at 424-25. And, unlike the 100-to-1 crack-to-cocaine ratio in Kimbrough, 128 S. Ct. at 575, the career offender guideline in this case (§ 4B1.1) is exactly the type of guideline issue that “exemplif[ies] the Commission’s exercise of its characteristic institutional role.” In fact, this provision is the direct result of Congress’s directive: Section 994(h) of Title 28 [] mandates that the Commission assure that certain ‘career’ offenders receive a sentence of imprisonment ‘at or near the maximum term authorized.’ Section 4B1.1 implements this directive, with the definition of a career offender tracking in large part the criteria set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 994(h). U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 Commentary (Background). This alone is likely sufficient to distinguish the outcome of this case from that in Kimbrough. Furthermore, nothing in the district court’s explanation of its reasoning, as documented in its sentencing order, indicates that this case is atypical. In Rita, the Court acknowledged that, in every case, “both the sentencing judge and the Sentencing Commission…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) CITATION: McDonald V. City of Chicago, III., 130 S. Ct. 3020- Supreme Court 2010…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Michael David Mitchell

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    VIRGINIA, U. S. (n.d.). Case 3:09-cr-00425-JRS Document 8. Retrieved from Michael David Mitchell Statement of Facts: http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/uploads/file/Mitchell%20Agreed.pdf…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As soon as civilizations created constitutions, actions were being called unconstitutional by those who opposed them. In some instances, unconstitutional acts were the subject of revolution, regicide, or as happened in the American political system, the declaration of a Judiciary body. American judicial review can broadly be defined as the power of this such judicial branch of the government to determine whether or not the acts of all branches of the government and government official comply with the Constitution. It derives from the doctrine of "judicial supremacy", which in turn legitimises this definition by declaring that "both the letter and spirit of the Court's constitutional determinations bind all branches of government and government officials." (Siegel, Ely, McCloskey). Originating as far back as the late 1700's, this practice of judicial review, has allowed judges, thus, to maintain limited government and the rule of the people and to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution, by using the power allocated to them "to declare "null and void" any acts of the national government or of the states which they themselves deem contrary to the Constitution." (Irish and Prothro, 522). Thus, in effect the law becomes "what the judges say it is" (Irish and Prothro, 522).…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    March/April 2013 Ld Aff

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Resolved: Rehabilitation ought to be valued above retribution in the United States criminal justice system...…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    O 'Hear, M. (2011). Beyond Rehabilitation: A New Theory of Indeterminate Sentencing. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis: https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=48+Am.+Crim.+L.+Rev.+1247&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=f327de58bd6ca8f479356f7658da7248…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    V. What legal precedent did this case set? What was the significance of this decision for the U.S. at the time of the decision?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justia Company. (2011). 961 F.2d 260: United States of America v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.,…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People in the United States attend court every day for different many reasons. Those reasons could be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or for unlawful criminal acts. No matter what they are all handled and disputed in a court of law. Courts are empowered to make fair and binding decisions upon the facts that are received. There are two types of courts; civil court and criminal court. It is very important that people understand and know the differences between civil and criminal courts. Civil courts handle resolutions between private parties and usually consist of one party suing the other for some type of monetary damages. Criminal courts on the other hand, try alleged offenders for suspected crimes committed, whereas the end result is either freedom for the offender or a prison cell.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    University of Phoenix. (2009). United States of America v. Richard D. King, Jr.. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, BCC 402 website.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wilson, Robin Fretwell. "." BYU Journal Of Public Law 22.2 (2008): 475-497. Academic Search Premier.…

    • 2906 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Copyright Law

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages

    There is no such thing as international copyright protection. There is not a universal law that will give an individual protection of their intellectual property throughout the entire world. Nonetheless, the importance of this issue is mounting. As the world capitalizes on ever increasing globalization, the borders of countries are disappearing. The author Thomas Friedman would say the competitors of today’s world are left with a flat playing field as a result of globalization. Although the field the world is competing on may be called flat, there still lacks a uniform code of laws that regulates how the game is played in regards to protecting intellectual property.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays