Preview

Indeterminate Sentencing Structure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
825 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indeterminate Sentencing Structure
Robert Munoz Jr
CJAD 350
25 January 2015
Professor Carden

Rapid Changes in Sentencing Structures Judges in the United States used indeterminate sentencing for nearly 45 years. This type of sentencing has a set limit of incarceration that a convict may serve for the crime committed. If the judge gives an offender two to five years imprisonment, then that offender will serve a minimum of two years but will serve no more than five years. This system was put into place to make the offender in their release with good behavior in prison. With this in effect it gave offenders to rehabilitate in prison. With good behavior in prison it could release them sooner rather than later (depending on the procedure’s of the parole board).
…show more content…
Many believed that ‘broad discretion produced arbitrary and capricious decisions and that racial and other invidious biases influenced officials’ (Tonry, 1999). Considering that many of those involved in the sentencing and releasing of prisoners are not subject to review, Tonry has a valid point. There is no set standard for indeterminate sentencing, so judges had fairly free reign as to sentences. And it seemed to some, that criminals of different races and classes were often given vastly different sentences for committing the same crime, otherwise known as sentencing disparity. Even though incarceration should be about rehabilitating prisoners and releasing them back into society as productive members, unfortunately it has become about politics. Those running for office always want to appear to be tough on crime, and indeterminate sentencing appears to some to be too soft. Allowing prisoners to earn their freedom before they have served their maximum sentence is not punishment in the eyes of those that believe prisoners should be locked up and made to do hard …show more content…
E., Latessa, E. J., & Ponder, B. S. (2013). Corrections in America. Boston: Pearson, Inc.

Attica Revisited. (2006). Retrieved from Talking History: http://www.talkinghistory.org/attica/

O 'Hear, M. (2011). Beyond Rehabilitation: A New Theory of Indeterminate Sentencing. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis: https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=48+Am.+Crim.+L.+Rev.+1247&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=f327de58bd6ca8f479356f7658da7248

Overview of Sentencing Reforms and Practices. (2000, June 19). Retrieved from Connecticut General Assembly Office of Program Review and Investigations: http://www.cga.ct.gov/pri/archives/2000fireportchap1.htm

Tonry, M. (1999, September). Reconsidering Indeterminate and Structured Sentencing. Retrieved from National Criminal Justice Reference Service:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Based on the information provided to me from the text, and the knowledge I have gained from previous classes, I believe that the nation of Germany should have been represented in the Treaty of Versailles and the War Guilt Clause should have been left out. One quote I have always admired was “forgive but not forget.” The allied nations did not forgive at all. The War guilt put all the blame on an already deprived germany. The war left land destroyed, families torn, and the economy in europe devastated.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A majority of the states have done away with this because of the need to decrease the prison population. With this being said the indeterminate sentencing is the better model that is more appropriate for determining the release of inmates. Because even though there are valid reason for most states to turn to determinate sentencing, is also has many problems that come with it also. The main reasons that indeterminate sentencing should be used more are:…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elizabeth Johnson was a model student. She was characterized by her teachers as hardworking, driven, and goal oriented. After being placed on the honor roll and graduating early from Morris High School in Will County, Illinois, she attended Northern Illinois University to become a lawyer. Within her first year at college, her life derailed. She was caught by the police and arrested for possession of marijuana. Johnson was expecting to be placed in prison but she found herself in a drug court, which assigned her mandatory drug rehabilitation. After graduating from the rehabilitation program, she went back to school at John Marshall Law School, and passed the bar exam. Now, after seven years of completing the drug program, she has…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An indeterminate sentence is decided by the sentencing judge, and is later reviewed by a release authority to determine the actual time that will be served. Indeterminate sentences are given at the time of the sentencing and are given a minimum to a maximum time to be served by the criminal. After the minimum term has been served, the offender is provided with the opportunity to be released, by being placed on the parole board. The parole board then determines the release date, time frame is between the minimum and maximum term sentence. If the parole board does not issue parole for the offender, he or she is to serve the maximum sentence. Upon completion of the sentence served, the offender is to be released. Determinate sentences are sentences that are fixed term to be serve. The offenders are eligible for release soon after completion of the time that was originally given. Unlike the indeterminate sentencing, offenders who are under the determinate sentences, t are not reviewed by any parole board and are to be released upon completion of his or her time served. The sentence that should be considered more normally is the indeterminate sentencing. The fact that the indeterminate sentencing has a parole board, should allow personnel to evaluate the individual and really determine if the criminal is eligible for release. The parole board should have all records of behavior and should have a minimum requirement of training completion, in rehabilitation. Training must be successful courses completed, showing the individual 's behavior improvement. If the offender does not have any, he or she may be considered to be released until the requirements are met. He or she may be given an option in six months for another review, in order to proceed to the parole board for release. (Seiter, R.P…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges have lost the ability to tailor the sentence to fit the circumstances of each individual case. One size does not fit all. The Guidelines are one cause of the dramatic growth in the federal justice system. A system intended to streamline and simplify the sentencing process has instead created a far more complex system that has clogged the courts with appeals over Guidelines' applications. Furthermore, the federal Guidelines are not simply guidelines, as the name suggests: they are mandatory. Judges are required to follow them, no matter how inappropriate the result (Anderson,…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To me Indeterminate Sentencing is a very degraded and/or very disturbed type of sentencing. In this sentencing a legislature is the one who has say as to what the terms will be for the crime that has been committed and a judge gets the decision as to what the sentence will be for the offender. As I look at this information I feel that the judge should have a say in what the sentence will be, but not have all the power as to what it will be. A Parole Board gets to determine as to what the amount of time is that the offender will spend in prison for the crime he or she has committed. In this type of sentencing, one of the guidelines is that when determining the sentence it should meet all of the needs of the offender.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indeterminate sentencing – what and why? 9. Determinate sentencing- what and why? 10.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the cons of the determinate sentencing is that if a criminal is sentenced in that area then the prisoner will serve six months in jail or prison and according to Janet Portman the author of Indeterminate Vs Determinate Prison Sentences Explained she stated that “determinate sentencing has a defined length of time that the prisoner has to serve for more than six months out of a year and that sentencing model is reserved for felonies and violent offenders and that person won’t be able to get parole due to defined time and what that means it cannot be changed by any agency including the parole board under any circumstances regardless.”…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The sentence imposed typically included incarceration, probation, and fines. Under this scheme, a judge typically will impose a sentencing range rather than a specific time, allowing a parole board to decide when to release the offender. An example of this is when an offender is convicted of homicide and is sentenced to twenty-five years to life. The offender understands that he or she will spend the minimum time of twenty-five years incarcerated but may be required to serve a sentence of up to a maximum of life. The actual amount of time spent after the twenty-five years will depend on the conduct and success in the rehabilitative process of the offender during his or her time…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are various forms of sentencing that are used in the criminal justice system and each has its’ own rationale. These include but are not limited to the death penalty, incarceration, suspended sentence, probation, and restitution. The death penalty must be requested by the prosecutor and in some rare cases the defense. The death penalty can also be recommended by a jury, however only specific crimes are eligible for the death penalty. Most states require a certain number of witnesses in order to qualify the defendant for the death penalty. These crimes vary from state to state and include aggravated rape of a victim under 14 (including repeat offenses), espionage, piracy, ransom kidnapping, treason, and most commonly aggravated first degree murder. Incarceration is another popular form of sentencing. Although jail and prison are often used interchangeably, they differ. A prison sentence is typically longer and for those who commit felonies. A jail sentence is shorter and for those who commit misdemeanors, who are awaiting trial, or waiting to be transferred to a state facility. The ideology behind prisons is easy to recognize. We follow prisons in every…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays