Preview

Indeterminate Sentencing Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indeterminate Sentencing Research Paper
Sentencing
Determinate and Indeterminate Sentencing:

The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.
The authority of a parole board to grant discretionary release to a prisoner before the expiration date of the maximum term varies from state to state and is a creature of the state's sentencing structure. Such structures are broadly categorized as determinate and indeterminate. These categories must be characterized as broad
…show more content…

The judge's sentence is also made in terms of a minimum and maximum term. The parole board determines the actual release date. The board typically has a formula for determining earliest parole eligibility. Parole eligibility (but not necessarily release) may occur after a percentage of the minimum, after a percentage of the maximum, or after the entire minimum has been served, depending on the state.
States with indeterminate structures vary in terms of the breadth of the legislated sentence ranges and the discretion afforded to the judges and parole boards. Some states have placed restrictions on the range of terms that a judge may impose: the range may be no greater than one-third of the maximum sentence, for example. The parole board in some jurisdictions has the discretion to set its own formula for release eligibility, while in others the legislature determines it.
Determinate sentencing can take two forms: legislatively determined or judicially determined. In either case, the offender is sentenced to a specific term of incarceration. He or she is released at the expiration of the term, minus good time credits if they are available. There is no discretionary parole release, although there may be a period of supervision in the community. Under a legislatively determined structure, the legislature fixes by law the penalty for specific offenses or offense categories. In a judicially determined system, the judge has broad discretion to choose a sanction, but, once


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are a number of conditions that affect parole, both during the time of incarceration,…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |prisoners? |parole if you sever less than your sentence. Federal prison is also prosecuted by the |…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan Unit 3 Paper

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indeterminate sentencing is the legal philosophy at the appropriate period of sentencing for a crime is to hold the offender as long as is appropriate to protect the community from an offender. An indeterminate sentencing philosophy holds the prisoner should on being allowed to leave when their behavior has changed drastically that the offender who's been incarcerated no longer poses a threat.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parole Pros And Cons

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are many things that the parole board should consider when making the decision to release an inmate or not. One factored being the severity of the crime. If the crime was murder or cause major damage to a thing or person, the board should not let that person out on parole. If you…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An indeterminate sentence is decided by the sentencing judge, and is later reviewed by a release authority to determine the actual time that will be served. Indeterminate sentences are given at the time of the sentencing and are given a minimum to a maximum time to be served by the criminal. After the minimum term has been served, the offender is provided with the opportunity to be released, by being placed on the parole board. The parole board then determines the release date, time frame is between the minimum and maximum term sentence. If the parole board does not issue parole for the offender, he or she is to serve the maximum sentence. Upon completion of the sentence served, the offender is to be released. Determinate sentences are sentences that are fixed term to be serve. The offenders are eligible for release soon after completion of the time that was originally given. Unlike the indeterminate sentencing, offenders who are under the determinate sentences, t are not reviewed by any parole board and are to be released upon completion of his or her time served. The sentence that should be considered more normally is the indeterminate sentencing. The fact that the indeterminate sentencing has a parole board, should allow personnel to evaluate the individual and really determine if the criminal is eligible for release. The parole board should have all records of behavior and should have a minimum requirement of training completion, in rehabilitation. Training must be successful courses completed, showing the individual 's behavior improvement. If the offender does not have any, he or she may be considered to be released until the requirements are met. He or she may be given an option in six months for another review, in order to proceed to the parole board for release. (Seiter, R.P…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges in the United States used indeterminate sentencing for nearly 45 years. This type of sentencing has a set limit of incarceration that a convict may serve for the crime committed. If the judge gives an offender two to five years imprisonment, then that offender will serve a minimum of two years but will serve no more than five years. This system was put into place to make the offender in their release with good behavior in prison.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With a determinate sentence the convicted person is given a sentence that has a defined length to be served and cant’ be changed by a parole board or any other agency but may reduced by factors such as “good time”. While with an indeterminate sentence it consists of a range of the years that will be served. There is always a minimum sentence but the release date if any is uncertain. It is determined by a parole board when it periodically reviews the case, and could be given the possibility for parole. The problems that criminals with mental health problems face with determinate sentencing are the parole chance. The fact that there is no chance of parole with determinate sentencing makes it hard for the individual to get treatment for his or her disorder. Being in prison is a harsh place and with the fact that a individual with mental health problems is put into a penitentiary without getting help just add fuel to the fire making it harder and harder for them to recover. Also there is no probation given because they are sent straight to jail or prison were they are told to serve an exact time, which then leads to no chance of actual treatment for the individual. With prevention being one of the main goals of determinate sentencing it also leads to a chance of greater occurrence after the individual being released. Yes they are preventing crimes from happening while the criminal is incarcerated but what about when he’s released? He still has the same mental problems as before if they haven’t increased. They are given little to no treatment to help their mental problems therefore increasing the possibility of reoccurrence later. I believe that if a criminal with mental health issues is being served with a determinate sentence that he or she should first spend a set amount of time in a mental hospital until progress has been made and been noted as being safe to serve out the rest of his sentence in a prison or…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Punishment Philosophies

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Grant, D. & Meyer, J. (2003). The court in our criminal justice system. Upper Saddle River,…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before looking into the operation of judicial discretion in practice, it is necessary to find its definition and an outlook of Judicial structure on sentencing in England and Wales. The concept of discretion, that is central to the understanding of the judicial process, differs from deciding a question by applying a fixed rule of decision in the way that the decision-maker is able to decide between alternative courses of action. In simple words, Judicial Discretion is the authority the law gives the judge to choose among several lawful alternatives.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing and punishment has actively involved the discretion of judges and magistrates in affecting the decision of the sentencing. Discretion involves the power of Judges and magistrates to determine the most appropriate sentence for a case. Allowing judicial officers to decide sentences on a case by case basis and thus permitting them to take into account the various circumstances. Many factors influence the role discretion plays or alternatively doesn’t play in the sentencing and punishment of offenders. This includes statutory guidelines, mandatory sentencing, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the use of victim impact statements.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habitual Offender Laws

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The central features of enhancement statues are (1) that they add severe penalties (twenty to twenty-five years) on to the penalty for committing the original crime, and (2) those receiving enhancement-statue punishments are not entitled to features such as early release, gain time, and provisional credits. In sentencing-guideline states, enhancement statues provide the amount of punishment by calculating the amount outside of the guidelines. The ultimate consequence of enhancement statues is that they ensure that the inmate undergoes a significantly long period of incarceration; this period is a flat-time sentence that cannot be affected by early-release procedures. Judges know that legislators have totally castrated the judicial discretion powers in every instance where they are faced with sentencing defendants convicted under enhancement statues. These enhancements have become common household names: three-strikes, 10-20-Life, habitual-criminal, and trafficking. Enhance sentences are almost universally disliked by trial judges, because they have no choice but to impose the statue in spite of mitigating factors. Of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays