Preview

Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.
Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.
I think that


References: Lenz, M. (2006). Lawyers weigh in on changes to law. The Exeter News-Letter. Retrieved on January 10, 2007 from www.seasoastonline.com/news/exeter/08222006/nhnews-x-sentencinc0822.html Montaldo, C. (2007). Mandatory drug sentencing laws. About: Crime/Punishment. Retrieved on January 10, 2007 from www.crime.about.com/od/issues/i/drug_sentence_2.htm Siegel, L. & Senna, J. (2006) Introduction to Criminal Justice p. 399
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums

    The biggest complaint about mandatory minimum sentences is that they are unfair. A judge does not have the authority to tailor the sentence to the specific facts. Therefore, someone who was an unimportant part of a drug conspiracy might be stuck with the same minimum sentence as someone who was the ringleader behind the crime. Mandatory sentencing laws also do not allow plea bargains, so even if the prosecutor…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Sentencing
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Sentencing

    Should a defendant be found guilty an defense counsels job continues as referenced in this slide. If found guilty a defense counsel will present arguments at sentencing to persuade a lighter sentence, or mistakes, although this will not change a guilty verdict, it does however provide the defense and the defendant the opportunity to address the court. It does also allow the prosecution and the victims the right to also address the court to persuade the judge for a stepper sentence. The next step after sentencing is appeals, in most cases of murder a defendant sentenced to life will get with is defense counsel to file appeals, as in the Hettrick…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Against Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Against Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    If I were a legislature and wanted to propose laws that would abolish the mandatory minimum sentencing, I would focus on evidence that suggests these statutes are the root cause for overcrowding and financial burdens to government budgets (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Because every state in the union has been affected by mandatory minimum sentencing, I would also capitalize on the trends of other states releasing prisoners’ early and abolishing similar sentencing laws (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons

    According to some experts it's a long way to go, and it needs to be reformed before it's considered just. One area this is apparent is in drug courts, which have proven to help place low-level offenders into drug treatment programs avoiding federal prison incarceration (Schuster 2010). Many of them treatment facilities have a strict criteria for admission. Many of the cases are ones that a prison term would most likely would not be imposed, with or without the program. School-zone drug laws, imposed with the enthusiastic goal of stopping drug sales to children. Unfortunately its unintended criminal convictions most often arrested for sales between consenting adults (Gertsman…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay
    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay

    The history of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing (penalties) according to the web, in the early 18th century, congress has used Mandatory minimum penalties since it first present the first federal penal (a code of laws concerning crimes and offenses and their punishments). Mandatory minimum penalties has always been important for serious offensive, for instance murder or treason, it's also important to address immediate problems and exigencias. The Constitution permitted Congress to established criminal offenses and established the punishments for those offenses. First comprehensive, created by congress, of federal offenses with the passage of the 1790 Crimes Act, which it…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Mandatory Minimums
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Mandatory Minimums

    For instance their studies have shown that although around 20,000 drug offenders have been sentenced to mandatory minimums in Massachusetts alone, rate of drug abuse and addiction has not declined. Their argument stands that if mandatory minimum sentences are repealed then that drug offenders should be sentenced like any other case in which someone breaks a law. A judge should look at the person’s criminal history, their involvement and severity of the crime committed, the danger that the person could be to society and if the person needs professional help, such as psychiatric care or drug treatments (FAMM). Mandatory minimums take the role a judge plays out of their…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Mandatory minimum sentences are imposed by statutory law and are based on specific types of crime (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). All fifty states participated in these sentences by the mid 90’s (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Studies have shown these sentences were effective in the beginning, but long-term results showed they did not have a significant deterrence on crime (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federal Bureau of Prisons
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Federal Bureau of Prisons

    “The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 established determinate sentencing, abolished parole, and reduced good time; additionally, several mandatory minimum sentencing provisions were enacted in 1986, 1988, and 1990.” (“Federal Bureau of,”) As a result of federal law enforcement efforts and new legislation that dramatically change sentencing in the federal criminal justice system. The 1980s brought an amazing increase in the number of federal inmates. From 1980 to 1989, the inmate population more than doubled, from just over 24,000 to almost 58,000. During the 1990s, the population more than doubled again, reaching close to 136,000 at the end of 1999. Efforts to combat illegal drugs and illegal immigration contributed to the increased conviction rates.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Corrections History
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Corrections History

    Sentencing policy is also driven by societal norms, values and the political process. The Community Corrections Act was passed in 1973 allowing property offenders to be penalized within the community instead of only within in a prison setting. This change allowed for the limited and expensive prison resources to be saved for the violent and threatening offenders. State sentencing guidelines were passed in 1978, along with mandatory minimum sentences for serious crimes, with the goals of trying to alleviate perceptions of inequality and to control liberal release practices. The proportional guidelines were extremely successful. The success can be measured by the shift in ratio of the prison population with regard to property and violent offenders occupying the space. This relationship between violent versus non-violent inmates proportionality in prison populations is at great risk today due to the re-codification of controlled substance laws as an answer to the "crack" menace introduced in the mid-1980s. This drug phenomena will be explored in more detail shortly. Based on these few of many examples, it is obvious that Mr. Cain was…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Policy Issues Paper
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Policy Issues Paper

    Violence in any form can have a lasting effect on a person. Children who witness violence are permanently scarred because of what they are seeing. Children who witness family or domestic violence are affected in ways similar to children who are physically abused. Children are often unable to establish nurturing bonds with either parent and are at a greater risk for abuse and neglect if he or she lives in a violent home. Statistics show that an estimated 3.3 million children are exposed to violence against their mothers or female caretakers by family members in their home each year (Ackerman & Pickering, 1989). When a spouse, woman or male is abused, and there are children at home, the children will be affected by the abuse. This paper will refer to the video, “Child Exposure to Domestic Violence.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Habitual Offender Laws
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Habitual Offender Laws

    The central features of enhancement statues are (1) that they add severe penalties (twenty to twenty-five years) on to the penalty for committing the original crime, and (2) those receiving enhancement-statue punishments are not entitled to features such as early release, gain time, and provisional credits. In sentencing-guideline states, enhancement statues provide the amount of punishment by calculating the amount outside of the guidelines. The ultimate consequence of enhancement statues is that they ensure that the inmate undergoes a significantly long period of incarceration; this period is a flat-time sentence that cannot be affected by early-release procedures. Judges know that legislators have totally castrated the judicial discretion powers in every instance where they are faced with sentencing defendants convicted under enhancement statues. These enhancements have become common household names: three-strikes, 10-20-Life, habitual-criminal, and trafficking. Enhance sentences are almost universally disliked by trial judges, because they have no choice but to impose the statue in spite of mitigating factors. Of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tough On Crime Mentality
    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tough On Crime Mentality

    The “tough on crime” mentality, as discussed in class, can be dangerous. On the surface, it sounds good. It is an admirable goal to have to eliminate crime and “clean up the streets,” but there are issues with the execution. One issue with the “tough on crime mentality” is that it takes a complex social phenomenon and offers a simple solution, mandatory minimum sentencing. Mandatory minimum sentencing takes away from the complex nature of crime by suggesting harsh sentences for all. Often, harsh sentencing is not always what is needed. Some offenders do not need to be in prison for 25 years on drug charges, some offenders need not be in prison at all. But with the “tough on crime” mentality taken on by many politicians, the laws in place sentence everyone extremely harshly.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Prison Overcrowding
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Problem Of Prison Overcrowding

    Over the years prison overcrowding has been a major issue. Little has been done to resolve this but failed. Luckily there have been people who came up with solutions to this problem. One idea that has been that has been brought up was to replace mandatory sentencing laws with more flexible and individualized guidelines. state governments had enacted a mandatory sentencing statutes. These Mandatory sentencing laws like these limit judicial jurisdiction by preventing sentencing judges from considering a full range of mitigating factors in a defendant’s profile, such as the defendant’s role in the offense or likelihood of committing a future offense. Another idea would be to give prisoners a full year off their sentences for participation in…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics