Preview

Organisational Behaviour

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
953 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organisational Behaviour
Historical Development of Organization Behavior

The field of organization has developed from the studies conducted by the behavioral students of organization.

1. The Classical Theorists

Just before World War II, and aftermath of the Industrial Revolution, the shape and nature of management started changing. Large scale production, poor labour conditions, poor environment, gave birth to the thinking whether production can be increased by improving these conditions. It is from this perspective new behavioral theories developed leading to more efficient organization.

d. The Classical Theorists

(i) Henry Fayol, Gullick, Urwick and others were working in organisations and wanted to develop ideas which were universally applicable. In this process they developed Principals of Organisation/management that according to them were universally applicable to all the organizations, for 14 example principles developed by Henry Fayol, POSDCoRB. The idea behind these principals to improve performance and productivity of organization.

(ii) The Scientific Management Movement

Frederick W. Taylor called his ideas of management ‘Scientific Management’. He advocated parity of wages—the internal as well as external and thus created interest in the workers and the supervisors. He created and developed various wage payment plans, supervisor training in order to make supervisor a strong link between non management group. F. W. Taylor also recognized the need for giving financial incentives to the workers and therefore developed incentive payment plans too. The changes he brought to management thought paved the way later for the development of Organisational Behavior. (iii) Bureaucracy

The concept of bureaucracy was first formally formulated by the German sociologist Max Weber. He identified number of features that would make organization function efficiently. Prominent among those features are hierarchy, rules and regulation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages

    The aim of this report is to analyse two companies who have significantly different organisational structures. It will analyse the relationship between an organisations structure and culture and the effects on the business performance. Also the factors which influence an individual’s behaviour at work will be looked into.…

    • 6305 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cognitive Intelligence (CI) and Emotional Intelligence (EI) are considered to be important individual differences in the field of organisational behaviour and there is a lot of research to support this statement. This essay will critically evaluate both concepts and discuss how cognitive ability and EI are applied in modern organisations. It is clear that CI and EI both have very different roles in the modern organisation and they assist in the prediction of success in both personal and professional sectors of ones life. It is important to understand the main difference being that CI implements the individuals mental function for understanding and developing a systematic prospective in thinking whilst EI is considered as the ability for one to make decisions through their emotional and social skills and their understanding and belief system. In modern day organisations there has been a clear shift towards operating in an emotionally intelligent way as this is proving to hold a key to a successful organisation.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Political Activity is alive and well in organisations. Critically discuss this statement. What factors result in Organisational Politics and what is the role of such behaviour on other people at work?”…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The management theory and practice has changed over since the early 1900’s, while the economy developed. With the globalization and technology be used widely, the environment became more competitive. The social institutions feel pressure to face a new challenge. The management system should be innovated into the new conditions and challenges management and the new management made workplace more productive. The old management evolved from classical management approaches to modern management approaches. This essay will describe three parts of changing in management approaches: changing in the method of treating employees, changing the method of management problem solving and achieving modern management approaches.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 2117 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Explain how different types of organisational structure may affect organisational behaviour. Support your analysis by referring to the literature and by comparing and contrasting two different organisations.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 3239 Words
    • 13 Pages

    There are many ways in which different individuals have viewed personality. Robbins et al (2001, p. 99) define it as “the consistent psychological patterns within an individual that affect the way they interact with others and the situations they encounter”. Another definition provided by Huczynski and Buchanan (2007, p. 138) is that personality “is the psychological qualities that influence an individual’s characteristic behaviour patterns, in a stable and distinctive manner”.…

    • 3239 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Behaviour

    • 4218 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Tall hierarchies are essential to large businesses due to the extent of employees they employ each varying in specialist areas or tasks throughout the business. However, communication is slow as there are many different levels of management that have to be informed before any decisions can be made.…

    • 4218 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Early perspectives such as Taylor’s scientific management (1911) and Weber idea of bureaucracy (1947) sought universalistic principles of structure, planning and control.…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management is said to have no fixed definition, but different authorities on management have different views on it. The foundations of organizational behavior are based on the theories of two classical management entrepreneurs, F W Taylor and Henri Fayol[->0], these management theorists, although focusing on different aspects of Classical Management and organization have been fused as central and essential theories in Organizational behavior. The Scientific management which bases on the Classical Taylorism theory produced by Fedrick Taylor in 1880’s and 1890’s is distinctive from what Fayol contributed towards Behaviourist management also known as Administrative management. Both these theories are of great importance and thus, beneficial however with a couple of criticisms attributed to both. Even today a number of significant businesses evolve around these two management theories and thus, its implementation and outcomes are also observed in the modern world today. Although there are many other theories on management that include; Bureaucratic Organization of Weber. The Neo-Classical Theory that includes the Human Relations Movement of Mayo along with others like Roethsilberger and Dickson and the Behavioural Schools of Maslow, McGregor, Herzberg, Argyris, etc. There also exists another theory known as The Modern Management Theory. Taylor mainly concentrated on work organization such as productive efficiency whereas Fayol particularly focused on authority and its implementation/fulfilment. Taylorism is often mentioned with regard to Fordism, as it was closely associated with mass production methods in factories which was observed in Ford productions as well. Whereas Fayolism advocated a consistent set of principles that all organizations would generally apply/require/need to run effectively/properly.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first is represented by scientific management or the classical school of management theory. The scientific management approach strove to control people and keep down their costs. It emphasised the need for rationality, clear objectives, the right of managers to manage and adopted work study and similar methods. These led to the reduction of tasks to their basic elements and the grouping of similar elements together to produce low-skilled, low-paid jobs, epitomised by assembly line working with a large measure of interchangeability between workers. Workers tended to be treated relatively impersonally and collectively (management and labour) and the nature of the psychological contract was calculative, with a focus on extrinsic rewards and incentives. Such a strategy encouraged a collective response from workers, hence the development of trade unions. While this strategy epitomised the management approach of the first half of the 20th century, it has left its legacy in many management practices, such as organisation and method study, job analysis and description, selection methods, an overriding concern for efficiency and the bottom line, appraisal and performance management.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand the importance of classical approaches, we should think of the conditions that made them necessary. Early classic writers had a difficult task to establish and develop some of the first massive productions in the history. Apart from establishing their structure, they had to think of a way to improve and grow them. The end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century was marked by rapid industrial growth, technological progress and urbanization process. The factories would give work to numerous people, some of which with no education and no qualification. How could all these people be organized and the outcomes of their work maximized if not rationalizing the working process into simple repetitive tasks each worker could easily learn to do? And so, the rapid growth of the organizations was one of the main reasons for the necessity of clear, scientific approaches to…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    F. W. Taylor

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Category: BusinessAutor: jonirol 19 March 2012Words: 752 | Pages: 4The Life and Influence of Frederick TaylorFrederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915), founder of scientific management, was born in Philadelphia. He came from a Quakers family with rigid principles and he was educated with a disciplinary mentality, devotion to work and savings. During his first studies, he had direct contact with social and business problems that arise since the industrial revolution. He started his professional life as a common laborer in 1878 at the Midvale Steel Co., he started as a shop clerk and quickly progressed to machinist, foreman, maintenance foreman, and chief draftsman; he became chief engineer in 1885. At the time, the pay per piece or per task system was used. Taylor introduced then the piece-work in the factory. His goal was to find the most efficient way to perform specific tasks. He closely watched how work was done and would then measure the quantity produced (Kanigel 44).Taylor believed that the secret of productivity was finding the right challenge for each person, and then paying him well for increased output. At Midvale, he used time studies to set daily production quotas; incentives would be paid to those reaching their daily goal. Those who did not reach their goal would get the differential rate, a much lower pay. Taylor doubled productivity using time study, systematic controls and tools, functional foremanship, and his new wage scheme. He paid the person not the job. He stayed at Midvale until 1889.Later, he joined Bethlehem Steel Company. He registered about fifty patents of machines inventions, tools and work processes. In 1895, he presented to the American…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical management is a theory that emphasized greater workforce productivity. It can be understood by examining scientific management and classical organizational theory. The scientific management approach emphasized empirical research for developing a comprehensive management solution. Scientific management is that the manager is primarily responsible for increasing an organization's productivity, and its principles are to be applied by managers in a very specific fashion. Classical organizational Theory is concentrated on top-level managers and how they dealt with the everyday problems of managing the entire organization. Its major purpose was to develop basic principles that could guide the design, creation, and maintenance of large organizations, and to identify the basic functions of managing organizations. Classical management philosophers Frederick Winslow Taylor (scientific management) and Henri Fayol (Classical organizational theory) influenced the evolution of management.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hiii

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The be-all and end-all of life should not be to get rich, but to enrich the world. - B. C. Forbes…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays