Organization and Pluralist Attitude

Business in Singapore are often portrayed as adopting a “unitarist” rather than a “pluralist” attitude to employment relations. Is this justified or are times changing? Illustrate your arguments with contemporary examples.

Introduction
Businesses in Singapore often portrayed as adopting a “unitarist” attitude towards employment relations. The business organization is perceived as an integrated and harmonious “happy family”. Employees align themselves to the business’s vision, missions and goals, emphasizing mutual cooperation.

In unitarism, the organization is perceived as an integrated and harmonious whole with the ideal of "one happy family", where management and other members of the staff all share a common purpose, emphasizing mutual cooperation. Furthermore, unitarism has a paternalistic approach where it demands loyalty of all employees, being predominantly managerial in its emphasis and application.
Consequently, trade unions are deemed as unnecessary since the loyalty between employees and organizations are considered mutually exclusive, where there can't be two sides of industry. Conflict is percd the pathological result of agitators, interpersonal friction and communication breakdown.

Identification of relevant issues

Body
Examination & analysis of information

Conclusion,
The above cases suggests that Times are changing as businesses are moving towards having a pluralist attitude  justify
SG gov believes in Tripartite gum model, they will decide and are more pro-employers, this benefits businesses