Preview

Origin of the Cartel Among the Four Major Manufacturers of Elevators and Escalators:, Kone, Otis, Schindler and Thyssenkrupp

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Origin of the Cartel Among the Four Major Manufacturers of Elevators and Escalators:, Kone, Otis, Schindler and Thyssenkrupp
The orgin of the cartel
The EC started an investigation in early 2004 on its own initiative after being approached by an informant with information concerning the possible existence of a cartel among the four major manufacturers of elevators and escalators present in the European Union, KONE, Otis, Schindler and ThyssenKrupp.
They found out that 17 national subsidiaries of the above undertakings, as well as their controlling parents, and to Mitsubishi Elevator Europe B.V. which participated in the Dutch cartels are guilty for participating cartels.
The products which this industry is related to are elevators and escalators, as well as the provision of maintenance and modernization services for these products.
The elevator and escalator sectors in Europe are highly concentrated. KONE, Otis, Schindler and ThyssenKrupp are international manufacturers of elevators and escalators and are the most important manufacturers operating in Europe. Their aggregate European share of sales in the elevators and escalators sectors amounted to approximately 77% in (by volume) in 2003.
In Belgium, the four undertakings accounted for approximately 83% and in Germany 63% of sales in escalators and elevators combined. Even in Luxembourg close to 100% of all escalator sales. In the Netherlands, KONE, Otis, Schindler, ThyssenKrupp and Mitsubishi accounted for close to 88% of sales in escalators and elevators in 2003.
If we look at maintenance which is the most profitable service of the industry we see that in Belgium the big 4 has a market share of 71% and in Germany 51%.In the Netherlands, KONE, Otis, Mitsubishi, Schindler and ThyssenKrupp accounted for approximately 83% (by volume) of services of elevators and escalators in 2003.
If we look at the modernization services we see that in Belgium the big 4 accounted for approximately 75% and in Germany 82 % of modernization services in 2003.
In the Netherlands the big 4 and Mitsubishi accounted for approximately 97% of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Glo-Bus 2012 Quiz 1

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | components production and assembly, distribution and retailer relations, advertising and promotion, customer service, and accounting.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diversification of products and services and the wide network of stores improve sales and increase profitability. 40,000 different products falling into four categories mainly plumbing, electrical and kitchens; hardware and seasonal; building materials, lumber and millwork; and paint and flooring. In addition the company offers installation services. Installations are performed by pre-screened independent contractors. With the large number of stores if an item is out of stock at one location it can be shipped in from another many located in the same geographic area.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Numbers of companies in the industry: There are over 100 “big” companies in the industry. The top fifty companies, the “biggest of the big,” range in sales (2002) from $86.5 million to $4.64 billion and from 20 locations to over 1100 (7). In 2003 the top 10 distributors claimed 13% of the market share, and the next 80 companies following the top ten claimed 10% of the market share (17). The thousands of smaller local, regional, and specialty industrial distributors who in 2001 made up 92% of the industry only had less than 0.1% market share each (16).…

    • 15750 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Within in the United States competition was intense with a total of sixteen companies competing in the automotive lift market in North America. The industry was dominated by two large U.S. firms, AHV Lifts and Berne Manufacturing who together held approximately 60% of the market.…

    • 887 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3) Frandec Company manufactures, assembles, and rebuilds material hand equipment used in warehouses and distribution centers. One product, called a Liftmaster is assembled from four components: a frame, a motor, two supports, and a metal strap. Frandec is planning a production of 5000…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capstone Case Study Summary

    • 3336 Words
    • 14 Pages

    KONE is an elevator company with a new and innovative product to entering the market. This company is faced with the problem of what they want to charge and how they are going to position this newest product without cannibalizing their existing product lines. Another problem the company faces is how and to whom they should market this new elevator application. The company can rule out marketing to the high rise gearless traction market because their technology doesn?¦t apply to this market, as of now. Although they are not able to market to this group the benefits of gearless traction can be used in comparison to the geared and hydraulic elevator systems. One problem that was learned from the preliminary markets was that customers worried that KONE would be able to price gauge them since they were the only ones with this sort of technology.…

    • 3336 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of analyzing the business and industrial environment of Interserve’ Plc. is to assess the risk related to the industry (Support Service Industry). The support service industry is made up of many firms whose sole purpose is to deliver services to the consumer market. Using heavy machineries and hi-technologies.…

    • 6779 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |service company and a merchandising company.| | | | | | | | | | |…

    • 11453 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | * Aircraft and airport * Trucks, fuel, IT service providers, advertising agencies, box and envelop suppliers…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    business unit 1 p3

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this task I will be discussing how two different businesses such as Carphone warehouse and dogs trust are organised.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade agreement between Canada and China Canada and China have a FIPA which stands for Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement which is a bilateral agreement. The purpose is to promote and protect trade between China and Canada through rules and regulations agreed by both parties. The agreement is a bilateral one so it a relationship between the two countries. This strengthens their relationship and increases their trust as trade can be smoother. Also this makes sure that these two countries are growing economically.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    External Analysis Ge

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    General Electric distinguished itself as the major player in the energy/technological field. However, not too far behind are Siemens and Alstom, the second and third largest corporations that compete directly with General Electric. Siemens is headquartered in Munich, Germany and offering its services in over 190 different countries. In 2006 they recorded sales at 87.325 billion Euros. Over those 190 countries they employ about 475,000. Siemens is very similar to General Electric for the fact that they both offer a lot of the same products/services. Both companies also have strong brand name equity. Alstom specializes in energy, ship buildings, marine systems, and transport infrastructure. Their current headquarters is in Paris, France and the currently operate in 70 countries employees approximately 70,000. Their biggest acquisition came in 2000 when the acquired Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) who was a leading competitor to General Electric. In 2006, Alstom recorded sales of 14.208 billion Euros, which has been on a constant increase of about 6% in the last 5 years. The makers of substitute products that consumers could fall back to consist of Philips and Citigroup. Adaptac and Adept Technology are two other makers for substitute products. For all of these companies…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Silvio Napoli Schindler Case

    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Schindler is a Switzerland based elevator manufacturing company founded by Robert Schindler in 1874. Since its inception, the company has generated billion dollar revenues and is regarded as the technology leader in elevator manufacturing. Alfred N. Schindler, who is the 4th generation of the family to lead the company, has seen growth potential for the company in India and is attracted by the growing demands for elevators in that particular part of the world. After negotiations for a joint venture with a local Indian firm BBL has failed, Schindler decides to establish its wholly owned subsidiary in India. To lead the implementation of this plan Schindler has appointed Silvio Napoli, a Harvard MBA graduate as the head of the Indian subsidiary project. With the appointment of Silvio Napoli as the Head, several issues come up as the reality of starting up a new subsidiary in a country that is culturally different proves to be more challenging than what was initially anticipated. From having to deal with the newly formed management team taking orders for customized elevators, which is not part of the business plan written out by Napoli emphasizing the sale of standardized elevators only, to not getting full support from the European plants in regards to the request for parts and design specifications for the elevators, implementation of Napoli’s business plan is proving to be more perplexing than initially planned. Such issues raise the questions of whether appointing Silvio Napoli as the Head of the project is the right decision and how Luc Bonnard, who is the vice chairman of Schindler, would evaluate Napoli’s performance on the project thus far.…

    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schindler Holding Ltd, a respected Swiss elevator company, was established in 1874 by Robert Schindler and the first Schindler elevator was installed in India in 1925. After technical and sales collaborations with Indian companies, ECE and Bharat Bijlee Ltd.(BBL) in 1958 and 1985, Schindler Ltd decided to setup a wholly owned company in India in 1998. The Indian economy had been liberalized in 1991 and the economy was growing at a rapid clip with many commercial buildings, hotels etc, being setup. Sensing the growing opportunity, Alfred Schindler, Chairman and 4th generation founder family member, decided to invest in India. But he also knew that Indian elevator market was very demanding requiring customization even at the lowest elevator product range and very price sensitive. The market was also competitive and he was also aware that almost 50% of the market was captured by their worldwide competitors, Otis, and the remaining 24% by other well known brands like Finland based Kone etc. It was clear to him that entering this competitive yet potentially lucrative and profitable market would require services of a person with qualities of having a long term vision, foresight, be able to take high risks, be decisive, require thorough understanding of the local elevator market and to be able to adapt to the ever-changing local market conditions. Mr. Silvio Napoli seemed to have the right qualities for the job. Graduating with MBA from Harvard Business School, Silvio was appointed as head of corporate planning and was involved in strategic review processes, benchmarking and competitor analysis etc. thereby gaining good understanding of the global elevator market. He also gained good…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are sixteen firms competing in the automotive lift market in North America. AHV Lifts and Berne Manufacturing together held near 60 percent of market. Baxton Technology has two competitors that manufactures scissor lifts. One is the AHV Scissor Lift, which had a different lifting mechanism without safety locking features and was sold for about 20 percent less than the Baxton Lift. The other competitor is Mete Lift, sold for about 5 percent less than the Baxton Lift.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays