There are two major studies in which we can look, at these are Asch and Zimbardo. Asked our student volunteers to take part in the vision test, all but one of the volunteers were colleagues of the experimenter. the volunteers were shown 3 lines the free lines were all different sizes and there was a fourth line which was the same size as one of the 3 lines. All the volunteers had to do was to say Which line was the same size as the separate fourth line. Altogether there were 123 American undergraduates being tested. Asch showed a series of lines to participants seated around a table, participants always answered in the same order. The colleagues were instructed to give the same incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials. On 12 critical trials 36.8% of the participants got the answer incorrect in other words they conformed with the majority. A quarter of the participants did not conform on any of the trials. Although people did conform the size of the group depended on how many people conform e.g. if there was a large group and they all said the wrong answers the participant will become suspicious and not conform. Also the participants profession could make a difference on whether they conform e.g. a maths teacher will realise that the size of the line is the same as they work with this sort of thing every day. When the difference between the sizes of the lines decreased, making it harder to distinguish the difference between the lines, the level of conformity increased. this study was only conducted on American men during a period of time when people were scared to be different. another weakness is that only one third of participants conformed the other participants stuck and gave the right answer or the answer they thought was right The next study is Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment. To conduct this experiment a mock correctional facility was constructed in the basement of Stanford University, an advert was…
One strength of this theory is that it has research to support it from Asch's 1951 study into conformity. The interviews that were taken after the experiment had finished, stated that there were two main reasons that the participants conformed. The first reason was that they didn't want to be ridiculed by the rest of the group from differing in opinions. They wanted to fit in so went along with the majority group, typical of normative social influence. The second reason was that they honestly thought that the rest of the group knew better than them and that their own judgements were incorrect, typical of informational social influence.…
The Asch conformity experiments were a series of laboratory experiments directed by Solomon Asch that demonstrated the magnitude to which an individual's own opinions is influenced by those of a majority group. In Asch's experiments, students were told that they were participating in a “vision test.” The other participants in the experiment were all confederates, or assistants of the experimenter. At first, the confederates answered the questions correctly, but later began delivering obvious incorrect answers. The results revealed that participants did conform to the majority group thirty seven percent of the time, and also for particular reactions.…
The anther in the article individuality vs conformity explains that there is a middle between being weird, trying to fit in with the rest, and being yourself in the middle. The anther supports her analysis by justifying how she thinks there is a middle to individuality and conformity. The anther argue in order so that when teen read this they are inspired to find a side. The author writes in a friendly style for her teen audience and other interested in the topic of the balance between…
In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…
The Asch Conformity is an experiment where the researchers watch the participants answer questions and see what their answer is. Researchers are looking to see if the participants are persuaded one way or another when answering a question in a group setting. This study is similar to being in a class with other students. The teacher could go person to person asking a question and after the first person answers, the rest of them will typically say, “I got with he/she got.” More than half the time, they don’t know the answer or they don’t want to stick out like a sore thumb if their answer is wrong. This study is very similar to the actual Asch procedure. This experiment included 24 college students, 13 females and 11 males, during 18 trials of deciding which cards had the same length of the line printed on them.…
Asch’s conformity study made participants tell differences in length of lines when the majority answered incorrectly. These people did not receive any explanation why the majority disagreed and it dealt with an issue that was unimportant. Confusion would have been an issue and it is “hard to act independently when things don’t make sense”. People actively construe and act in response to their subjective interpretation of the experience. It is imperative to imagine oneself in the experiment to understand why someone would not have spoken up.…
The reason that 32% of the native participants modified their answer of line length to fit the confederates’ incorrect answers was to not deviate from social norms or be considered differently than the group. The participants that modified the correct answer preferred the comfort of belonging to a group than the knowledge that they answered accurately. This effect is an example of Normative Influence.…
“The Opinions and Social Pressure” Solomon Asch conducted an experiment that discovered the influences of a majority may have on an individual. The basic design of Asch’s study consisted of groups of seven to nine male college students seated in a classroom for a psychological experiment in visual judgment. The experimenter told them that they would be comparing the length of lines and he showed them two white cards below. The card on the left was the standard line to be judged and the card on the right shows the three comparison…
We’ve all seen or heard people telling you how to look, feel, or act. People telling you to change,so you can fit in or look better. We all have been pressured to be something we’re not. Society thinks that conformity is huge part of life, that it keeps everything together. Conformity is important, but what’s more important is being unique, being yourself not someone you’re not. It is not good for individuals to change their feels, beliefs, looks, or actions to fit in with society because you’re basically changing your image to impress people.…
Psychological researchers have been interested in the degree to which people follow or rebel against social norms for a long time. Solomon Asch conducted a series of experiments designed to demonstrate the power of conformity in groups. According to some critics, some of the individual subjects may have been motivated to avoid conflict instead of a desire to conform to the rest of the group. Nevertheless, many social psychology experts believe that while real-world situations may not be as clear cut as they are in the lab, the actual social pressure to conform is probably much greater, which can dramatically increase conformist…
For our stats project we decided to analyze how the characteristics of the person asking the question changes the answer. To do this, we asked two randomly selected groups of people the exact question: “do you like pugs?” However, one group was asked the question by someone wearing a pug shirt, and the other group was asked by someone in plain clothes. We believed the most submissive class to the charastric bias would be the freshman, so we used them in our experiment. To ensure this Simple Random Sample was completely random, we assigned every student in the freshman class a number and then used the random number generator on our calculator. The first twenty five students selected were placed in the non-pug wearing shirt group, and the last twenty five students selected were placed in the pug wearing shirt group. We hypothesized that wearing a pug shirt would persuade people to say that they liked pugs even when they did not. Our hypothesis proved to be correct. While overall the vast majority of people said they liked pugs, the three no’s that we received only came from the group who did not see the pug shirt. 88% of the non-pug shirt group said yes, while 100% of the pug shirt said yes to the question. We asked twenty-five people in each group and did not receive a single no from the pug shirt group. This data shows that there is some persuasion that comes from what the questionnaire is wearing.…
One hundred and twenty three male college students were involved in the study. Participants were shown a series of lines, a ‘standard’ line and several other lines in which they would match to the standard line. Their answers were announced one by one in seated order. All participants were told to answer unanimously before the trials began, except for one person out of the group. That one person was the focus of the study, seated at the end of the seating arrangement. His answers gave insights to the effective role social pressure plays on people’s decisions (178). During the trials, 36.8 percent of the participants sided with the unanimous incorrect answers given by the group. Another trial of the study showed, when given at least two people who answered incorrectly, it drastically swayed the opinion of the chosen individual, causing the individual to answer incorrectly by 13.6 percent. Given at least three people who answered incorrectly, the percentage jumped to 31.8 percent, however, anymore than three people would cause the effects of social pressure to remain fairly consistent (180). Solomon Asch also conducted an experiment where no subjects were told of the researchers…
Binkowski starts out by defining what conformity and the differences it has with individuality and what people who feel individuality express themselves through. He describe the personality of conformity as the need to join a certain group whether it is wearing a certain uniform, but he also shows the advantages that it can create order among people. An open minded and artistic person have an ideology of individuality that emphasizes creativity and the want for new ideas which most authors and artist have but this artistic mind comes with disorder.…
Young people of my country conform and deviate, but in varying degrees. This is expressed by Suematsu in paragraph 3 of passage B where he states “Conform too much, and you are toast, deviate too much, and you are toast too.” in context to the school life. It is the same with Singapore. Young people of my country must find the perfect balance of conforming and deviating in order to be “popular”.…