How far was peaceful protest responsible for the successes of the civil rights movement in the years 1955 - 1964?…
Peaceful protesting was a method used excessively between the period of 1955-64 (and prior to this) during the civil rights movement. It was used to bring about a “de jure” (legal change) and “de facto” (practical change) change for the rights of black Americans. Peaceful protesting was used as a means of theoretically “fighting” against unjust laws following the ideals of civil disobedience. This precise method was used by civil rights activist Martin Luther king and many others. Peaceful protesting was quite successful for the success of the civil rights movement.…
Peaceful protests are paramount in affecting change in a free society for a simple reason; those with power tend to keep it. Only through demonstration (or regulation) will they relinquish it. While this concentration of power is completely unjust, I don't blame the holders of it in the slightest. Although we humans are social creatures, we're nearly always out to ultimately better ourselves and carry on in our blissful ignorance that we aren't doing others any harm. This is where peaceful protests come in.…
Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…
Civil Disobedience means to peacefully refuse or comply with specific laws you personally do not agree with, and accepting the consequences by not following said laws. Throughout history you see Civil Disobedience from great people such as Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, “later in life” Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela. Each of these great historic people contributed to Civil Disobedience, trying to equalize African Americans in a Caucasian set world. As a whole our instinctive feeling is to divide up things that are different, one of those things being race.…
Mohandas Gandhi exhibited this during India’s independence movement. Gandhi held non-violent protests to fight for India’s independence. By protesting, Gandi displayed disobedience towards the British to earn rights for himself and others. He was able to peacefully achieve his goal of independence for India. Gandhi proved that disobedience allows people to create change that may not happen by following rules. People may argue that disobedience is injurious because it creates a rude, harmful society of people. This conjecture is incorrect because as Gandhi established, disobedience can be peaceful. Gandhi and all of his supporters were able to disobey while remaining non-violent to receive their rights from the British. Disobedience helps people improve their society and causes minimal harm, making it an exceedingly valuable human…
Gandhi used non-violent tactics to free British rule in India. Martin Luther King Jr. mostly used…
It is important to never exclude anyone whether intentional or by lack of thought or consideration. Just because a service user has dementia, it does not exclude him or her from taking part in activities and there should be activities to suit their capabilities so they are not left feeling isolated or inadequate remembering that dementia has a wide range of stages each person needs to be suitably stimulated, also having dementia should never result in them being excluded from decisions or discussions regarding their own care. Even advance dementia as long as they can still make their wishes known through speech, picture cards or other communication methods they must still be included. A good example of not excluding them from choices is if you were to offer a dementia sufferer a bath or wash and they decline to, do not try and force the issue, come back later and try again where a different state of mind could result in a different outcome.…
Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…
When fighting for Indian independence Gandhi declared, “Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man” (Prabhu). In other words, every individual has the ability to harness the force of nonviolence to combat oppression. In the United States during the Civil Rights Movement between 1954 to 1968, nonviolent protest gained popularity as a means to end discrimination and racial segregation against African Americans while positively impacting society by changing national views and laws. Nonviolence successfully protested racial discrimination, causing positive change by focusing national attention on pressing civil rights issues.…
How would you have felt if you were born back in time during discrimination and the civil rights movement? Many people’s rights were diminished throughout history. However, people such as the civil rights activist fought for their and future generations rights. Civil rights activist had a sole method throughout their fight against discrimination, and that is the use of nonviolence. Furthermore, in order for civil rights activist to achieve their goal, they used certain paths such as the purpose of nonviolence, nonviolence strategies, and the “Six Principles of Nonviolence.”…
Electoral College is the process which was brought up by the founding fathers. The founding fathers made it recognized in the constitution as a compromise, between election of the President by a certain number of votes and by a popular vote of qualified citizens. A controversy would be for Electoral college would be Samuel Tilden and Rutherford B. Hayes. In this election it proved that Tilden won the popular votes. Later the Commission voted and settled that Hayes was the winner. This comes to show that Electoral College doesn’t work in anyone’s favor.…
boycott of the buses. This was an extremely successful form of protest during The Civil Rights Movement. The first day of the boycott having been successful, King, E.D. Nixon, and other civic and religious leaders created the Montgomery Improvement Association—so as to continue the Montgomery Bus Boycott. The MIA managed to keep the boycott going for over a year until a federal court order required Montgomery to desegregate its buses.…
Watching videos, seeing pictures, and hearing audio of vicious cold blooded war that 's going on around is getting us no where. The progress of wars and fighting proves that most effective revolutions occur when there is minimal yet any bloodshed or violence takes place. Political, economical, and social aspects of countries configure down to the basis of this reasoning. If cruel violence, innocent death, and undeservedly bloodshed did not effect any then by all means go for it but in all cases that does not apply. Fighting without bloodshed is most effective way to begin and conclude a revolution. Revolutions such as Gandhi’s (India) Egyptian, and the Rose (Georgia) have all worked effectively therefore proving that non-violent revolutions can be successful.…
The United States of America was founded on the concept that all men are created equal; however, it has taken us until the last fifty years to make significant strides toward equality for many minority groups. Nearly 100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation, African Americans in Southern states still inhabited a vastly unequal world of disenfranchisement, segregation and various forms of oppression, including race-inspired violence (www.history.com, 2015). In 1960, the black Americans made up 10.5% of the total population and 55% of them were living in poverty (http://www.shmoop.com/, 2015). This is just one example of how a century of oppression can affect a whole demographic.…