Nix, K. (2013, November 20). What Obamacare’s Pay-For-Performance Programs Mean for Health Care Quality. Retrieved from www.heritage.org: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/11/what-obamacares-pay-for-performance-programs-mean-for-health-care-quality…
This method provided many insights about issues within their previous system that may be helpful towards bringing to light for other health providers as well. However, with all of these useful incentives, curiosity was raised regarding the wages paid to the PFS and registration Staff. The California Sutter health was able to implement these new and advanced changes to staff without the need to increase their earnings. However, this approach may not apply so smoothly towards other health care providers. Through my personal experience, most employees bear the mindset that the more work they have to perform, the more money they should get paid.…
For years hospitals have been rewarded, by way of reimbursement payments, to readmit patients. The National average of readmissions attributable to total reimbursements Research reports that up to 20 percent of hospital discharged Medicare patients are readmitted in 30 days (Jencks, Williams, & Coleman, 2009). The incentive to provide quality of care in such a manner that patients discharged from the hospital will remain healthy and complication free has never existed. In fact, no rewarding incentive exists even today. However, motivation to reduce patient readmissions is presently one of the most discussed topics in healthcare organizations nationwide. The motivating factor should have been obvious all along; to provide optimal care to patients’ during the hospitalization along with the appropriate discharge services, and follow up care to avoid readmissions. Healthcare organizations’ manic focus on readmissions has been prompted by money, not as a reward, but…
However the extra attention to detail of a patients life and health habits may reduce the amount of patients each provider can services, having to focus more time on each patient for higher quality of care makes it very difficult to keep the quantity of patients. Usually the fewer patients a provider has is helpful and allows the provider to provide better quality of care, however there are not enough current providers to service the number of patients in the United States. Providers are left with the struggle of balancing the number of patients they can service with the quality of care they can provide. While the idea of Pay-For-Performance systems is good there are concerns about the future effects on the health care system. One concern is that providers will pick and choose their patients by their health history leaving the sickest without care. The Pay-For-Performance system focuses on the outcomes of patients treatments as well as the manner in which they are treated. Because it is easier to have healthy patients if you start with patients that are not that sick in the first place it is a concern that providers will only take on patients that have simple or no health…
Another type of pay for employee’s within the NHS could receive performance related pay as it is a way of giving extra money to the employee’s on their performance over a certain period of three, six or twelve months. By doing this, the NHS staff about will maintain and improve the quality of patient care whilst managing workforce costs,…
More specifically, do financial incentives like Medicare’s flagship test of pay for performance improve the lowest performing hospitals compared to hospitals that are above the national median? But, first we should define what pay for performance really is or better known as P4P. Lucia Bruno a doctor and principal shareholder of physicians ' legal group explains it very well. Dr. Bruno says, "P4P programs are performance-based payment arrangements which align financial rewards with improved outcomes and changed behavior. The impetus behind P4P originated in the response to rising medical costs, growth in chronic care conditions, and consumer demands for efficiency and improvement in the quality of care (Bruno, 2012). There are usually three types of ways P4P goes about measuring performance. They are structural measures, process measures, and outcome measures. Structural measures focus on improving key parts of a system to better the quality of a care, while process measures assesses how well a specific health care system follows evidence-based guidelines and protocols (Bruno, 2012). Outcome measures incentives are mainly based on how well a patient is doing. In short, pay for performance is way that our health care system awards its clinicians for good structural, process, and outcome…
Reimbursement methods in health care refer to the capability of an individual to acquire compensation for out-of-pocket medical expenses paid by them from their insurance companies. In addition, reimbursement involves more than just what an individual gets paid since it is a long and frequently convoluted process (Quinn, 2015). The Value-based care (VBC) reimbursement models that replace the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) model, greatly affect the healthcare industry by increasing the costs and most importantly, the insured individuals put stress on their providers to supply quality care with greater efficiency (Quinn, 2015). The different reimbursement methods also help health care providers settle upfront productivity loss and investment costs. The different reimbursement reform acts increase the market competition.…
With healthcare spending steadily on the rise in the United States, healthcare payers are beginning to make the shift from volume-based to value-based payment regimes. The main focus in doing so is to improve the quality of care while reducing the cost. One type of value-based approach is an Accountable Care Organization (ACO), which is defined as a “group of healthcare providers who agree to share responsibility for the quality, cost, and coordination of care for a defined population of patients.” There are three core features of the ACO model. The first is that the ACO consists of a strong base of primary care health provider organizations; the second is that performance measurement is designed to support ongoing improvement in patient care…
Kovner, A. R., & Knickman, J. R. (Eds.). (2011). Jonas & Kovner’s Health Care Delivery in the United States (10th Ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.…
References: Davis, K., Schoen, C., Shea, K., & Haran, C. (2008). Aiming High for the U.S. Health System: A…
The way to get your employees to focus on both the present and the future is to adjust your culture and to weaken your financial incentives.…
It is believed that pay for performance is a strong tool to motivate employees. And a better employee performance improves the organization’s performance, including its financial results, implementation of project plans and achievement of strategic goals.…
This paper examines area of quality and patient satisfaction linked to reimbursement in the article by Nanda, Malone and Joseph (2012), where they describe strategies for changes needed in Health Care Design in response to the Affordable Care Act. The article notes that the main shift in reimbursement model will be tied into financial reward for patient experience as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) which aligns with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) patient centered care, one of their quality improvement aims. The PRWeb (2013) in Washington DC reports the reimbursement as follows “the…
1. Virtual tryouts allow candidates to show off their real workplace problem solving abilities that may not be visible in a traditional business interview setting. The conventional method of interviewing candidates is both time consuming and expensive especially if the pool of candidates is large or turnover in that particular industry is high. Virtual assessments come at an initial cost but over time have shown to lead to lower costs in the hiring process. Candidates feel as though more is being assessed than their appearance and ability to interview. There are some drawbacks though. There is little excuse any more to not be proficient with the use of a computer, but these tryouts have the potential to eliminate good candidates that have little or no experience with computer simulations. Also, the virtual tryouts do not completely eliminate the need for traditional interviews and assessments. Managers must decide if the opportunity to find better candidates is worth the high initial cost of these tools.…
Rewarding providers for their contribution to producing better health for the population and not just producing more health…