A probate court was created by the legislature because they thought that a separate court needed to be made to address probate issues in the big cities of the state. Probate issues include matters like guardianship. Texas District courts is one of the type of statutory courts of general jurisdiction which is served by at least one district court and the size is determined by the population size. These courts try both civil and criminal involved cases. Criminal cases are case that include violence like criminal activates while civil cases involve cases like divorce, property, custody, and law suits. Overall, the District court also handle juvenile cases and family laws as well. The supreme court gives justice to all civil and juvenile cases in the state and is made up of the eight justices and the chief justice. They have the power to make legal determination in occurrences when other courts don’t can’t. So anything that doesn’t fall under the other courts than the supreme court takes the responsibility, it’s also known as the highest civil court in the …show more content…
They allow the towing company to recover the cost of the destruction even though according to the Texas law there is not recovery on lose use of damage if the vehicle was total damaged. The court overturned this law that was made in Texas about the damaged property and allowed the recovery of the loss of use damages in this particular case. After the court looked at other cases from other states. The tribunal said that there are no compelling grounds to treat loss of use claims differently in cases that deal with total damaged property than property that can be remedied. The Court particularly did not hold that loss-of-use damages are no involved in every case that has to deal with property damage. Instead, the Court limited its decision to the facts before it, declaring that when an insurer unreasonably delays payment of a total loss, the claimant may recover both the just market value and reasonable loss-of-use damages. This is why the law was overturned and J&D was allowed to recover the cost of the