Preview

Pentium Flaw

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
723 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pentium Flaw
Kevin Flecker
NT-1110
4/26/2014
Pentium Flaw The Pentium FDIV bug was a bug in the Intel P5 Pentium floating point unit (FPU). Because of the bug, the processor would return incorrect results for many calculations used in math and science. Intel blamed the problem on a few missing entries in the lookup table used by the company. The error was discovered by Professor Thomas R. Nicely at Lynchburg College, Virginia, USA. The error was rarely encountered by users (Byte magazine estimated that 1 in 9 billion floating point divides with random parameters would produce inaccurate results).[3] However, both the flaw and Intel's initial handling of the matter were heavily criticized. Intel ultimately recalled the defective processors. Professor Thomas Nicely, a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg College, had written code to enumerate primes, twin primes, prime triplets, and prime quadruplets. Nicely noticed some inconsistencies in the calculations on June 13, 1994, shortly after adding a Pentium system to his group of computers, but was unable to eliminate other factors (such as programming errors, motherboard chipsets, etc.) until October 19, 1994. On October 24, 1994, he reported the issue to Intel. According to Nicely, his contact person at Intel later admitted that Intel had been aware of the problem since May 1994, when the flaw was discovered during testing of the FPU for its new P6 core, first used in the Pentium Pro.
On October 30, 1994, Nicely sent an email describing the error he had discovered in the Pentium floating point unit to various contacts, requesting reports of testing for the flaw on 486-DX4s, Pentiums and Pentium clones.[2]
This flaw in the Pentium FPU was quickly verified by other people around the Internet, and became known as the Pentium FDIV bug (FDIV is the x86 assembly language mnemonic for floating-point division). One example was found where the division result returned by the Pentium was off by about 61 parts per million.[2]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The flaw was first discovered in June 1994, when Intel engineers first noticed that the floating-point unit (FPU) on the chip gave the wrong answer. However future tests done by Intel showed that the error appeared only in the ninth significant digit of the answer and affected a very, very small percentage of possible division combinations. The results of this flaw…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Pentium flaw” or the Pentium FDIV bug was when Intel released defective Pentium processors. The defect was malfunctioning P5 Pentium floating point unit causing the computer to calculate division incorrectly. The “bug” was discovered by Professor Thomas Nicely when working on mathematical equations and noticed many inconsistencies in his calculations when he added a Pentium based computer on June, 13, 1994. Intel tried to keep the bug out of the lime light while they worked on updates to try and fix the problem but, persistent consumers kept pushing the issue on the internet and in magazines.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1972, Texax Instruments followed the Intel 4004/4040 closely with the 4-bit TMS 1000, which was the first microprocessor to include enough RAM, and space for a program ROM, to allow it to operate without multiple external support chips. It also featured an innovative feature to add custom instructions to the CPU.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The next two faults categories, excluding the OMISSION faults, emulate specific programming errors common to kernel code according to earlier studies [Sullivan and Chillarege, 1991; Christmansson and Chillarege, 1996].…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    En1320 Unit 1 Research Paper 1

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages

    The code in Figure 2-8 shows that even a simple operation, such as the addition of two…

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    admitted to Intel being aware of the flaw since May 1994. The flaw was discovered by…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sterling computer has entered into a partnership with NoBugs a microchip processing computer. The collaboration was developing into a something successful until an incident put a strain in the business relationship. Some month ago Sterling computer has had several of their computers explode shortly after customers install them. Upon an investigation which was conducted by Sterling researchers have discovered evidence of NoBugs’s microchips aggravating a dormant defect in their computers, causing them to explode. The analysis on NoBugs microchips revealed that they were indeed below design specification and that the imperfections were caused by a slight miscalibration of NoBugs’s encoding equipment. Once, the information was presented to NoBugs they course of action correcting the problem by recalibrating the equipment and promptly resumed production of making perfect chips. However, this incident has caused Sterling business to bare the gaunt of the financial burden which is a loss of profits, out-of-pocket associated with compensating customers for the explosions, and injury to its business reputation by total accumulation will exceed somewhere north of $20 million dollars.…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in June, 1994 the Pentium Flaw was noticed by Intel testers, who had discovered a division error on the Pentium chip. Intel managers didn’t see this as a major problem so they kept this from anyone outside their corporation. The nature of this issue was a mathematical problem in their Floating Point Unit (FPU), or the math coprocessor. The Pentium chip was having glitches in calculating large divisions. It wasn’t until October 19th, when Dr. Thomas R. Nicely had revealed the malfunction of the (FPU) trying to do certain calculations. Dr. Nicely was a mathematics teacher at Lynchburg College in Virginia. After running several test on the 486 and Pentium he had pin pointed the error to the Pentium chip. Dr. Nicely contacted Intel and they had confirmed the error, but said they had no reports till then. Intel handled the situation very poorly; they would not return contact to Dr. Nicely, forcing him to write a…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 5 research paper

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    announced that an error is only likely to occur [about] once in nine billion random floating point…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Loftus, E.F. (2002). Memory faults and fixes. Issues in Science and Technology, 18 (4), 41-50.…

    • 2572 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boiling Point Lab

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The biggest source of error in my opinion is human error - not recording the temperature exactly at the last bubble came…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Applications of time and measurement describe mathematical calculations particularly susceptible to propagating successive errors in downstream operations. Those flows create compounding phenomena, known as Propagation of Error, with the potential to severely degrade accuracy unless otherwise corrected or compensated. Imagine the profound corollaries of erroneous ship navigation while crossing an ocean, missile trajectory on a defense system or medical research for an experimental cancer treatment? In an age where technical accuracy often tethers people to seemingly routine activities, introducing indiscernible errors or functions can be the difference between convenience and jeopardizing lives.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written Pi: Mathematics

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1897, legislature of Indiana tried to legally establish the most accurate value of pi. However, the bill was never passed.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perfume Analysis

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There weren’t many areas for errors in this practical that would be attributed to our own human error. The gas chromatographer itself was very repeatable and hence the only error in the computers results would be due to a…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Titration

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |It is possible to make very precise measurements but still end up with an inaccurate result because of a weakness |…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays