Preview

Perception Of Peter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Perception Of Peter
This perception later followed by the scene in which the corpse of the murdered girl is shown, conditions and tricks the viewer and the detective to believe that Peter is the killer. There is never any direct evidence to indicate that Peter murdered anyone. Peter’s Schizophrenia is used as an explanation for his strange behavior and for his reason of presumed murder. The idea that the classification affects other people’s perception and expectation of those classified in a certain category is well illustrated through the librarian who when asked if Peter did anything to her, answers “He didn’t do anything but he made me think that he is going to do something bad to me. So are you going to protect us?”(52:43) Peter didn’t do anything; however, …show more content…

However, this lens is sometimes blurred because classifications often become an easy explanation of a person’s character and actions. This often creates superficial judgement that does not explore a person’s motive and feelings. As Peter Winter reminds, “For you it’s paranoia. For me it’s reality”. (06:37) It also seems that Peter is affected by the classification less through his perception of himself but more of people’s perception of him. Peter generally does not talk with people, as if he is aware that people will consider him abnormal. His awareness of his abnormality to others is seen in the scene where he opens the door while driving to somehow stop the auditory hallucinations. (51:20) When a car drives by, Peter notices that people are staring so he closes the door. In addition, considering the fact that he was locked in an asylum and deemed too dangerous to be with his daughter, it seems obvious why Peter does not share his suffering, paranoia and desire to be with his daughter. Because the people around him perceived Peter through the schizophrenic lens and its symptoms, they misunderstood Peter and prevented him from reaching out for help. As a result, Peter was misunderstood and eventually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    She said Peter had a “mob” with him when attacking Hypatia. A mob is a disorderly or riotous crowd of people so these people wanted to also hurt Hypatia. It also says that Peter killed Hypatia in a church. This suggests that he wanted god to witness this could be taken two ways one he wanted god to see what he would do for him and let people know there is only one god, or that he wanted god to witness so he would protect them. Why would Peter want god to protect him, maybe he knew that he was doing something wrong or he wanted strength because he was too weak to face Hypatia alone. So you know that from the reading that Peter was scared to face Hypatia…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue/area of concern raised in this report is as to how Peter’s death happened in the first place.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The church was wealthy, owned lots of land, and refused to modernize, Peter of course was not to stand for this disgust. In the the end he separated the church from the government, made it much weaker and forever changed its roll in its people and government. Finally education was one of peters biggest achievement he created schools of maths, navigation, medicine, engineering, and science and he kept creating till the day he died. Russia was beginning to modernize, more foreigners lived in Russian cities and mixed with Russia people, their western ideas and cultures were mixing with the Russian culture and creating a new modern life. Peter had started the chain of the modernization in Russia and the cruelty…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Discuss the concept of “madness” – is the narrator really crazy? Or just a little “misunderstood”.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Europe entered the eighteenth century a new emphasis was placed on developing colonies, earning money though taxes and a new system of justice and law. Great monarchs such as Peter the Great of Russia, and Louis XIV of France established many strategies in order to keep up with the rest of Europe. Both monarchs had similar goals such as to control the noble class, possess a professional army, and their views on religion. Peter’s goal to expand his empire through the use of his army, his tolerance of religion, his role as a “man of the people”, and his control of his nobles through taxation, differed from Louis non-tolerance of religion, control of his nobles through attendance at Versailles, use of an army for protection, and his divine right to rule.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter’s perseverance throughout the book led him to defeat Sir Phillip Morton and his conspirators. Peter was put in very difficult circumstances, such as when he snuck into the “Yellow Gentleman’s” house and got his stolen play back. Perhaps the author wanted to portray a different type of hero, but when Peter was climbing up the side of the house and-although it was a tough situation-kept going, it showed Peter’s heroic qualities. Peter’s state of mind at the time is unimaginable, he said this as he was climbing “Each time I put my weight on a fresh dagger, my heart went into my mouth and I heaved myself for the splash below.” (p. 132) Taking on such a job to begin with, is an enormous responsibility, but to do it alone, takes bravery and devotion. Peter displayed his endurance when he was held captive on an island for questioning and said “I knew I had to fight on. This was no sunny bathing trip.” (p. 201) Despite suffering, Peter was devoted to his mission and had the temerity to carry on. Although Peter’s life was at risk many times in the book Cue for Treason, he was able to endure the struggle.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Was Peter The Great?

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter the Great was born on June 9th, 1672 in Moscow, Russia. He was the Tsar of Russia in the late 17th century. Most people know him for turning Russia into a great nation with many aggressive Domestic reforms. There is controversy over whether or not he was actually “Great”. Peter deserves "the Great" after his name because his actions, though extreme, helped developed Russia into a world power.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those suffering from psychosis often heard curt, malevolent voices poking fun at the person or simply annoying him/her, while those who heard God’s voice typically heard benevolent, simple thoughts, like advice on which shirt to wear or which boy to date. Luhrmann’s book opened my eyes and helped my understanding of Wieland grow, as I can now see how Wieland and his family were probably suffering from psychosis rather than hearing God’s…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter the Panderer

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter the PandererIn this political speech I have identified the arguments and non-arguments, facts and non-facts, statements that are subjective, and the statements that are relativist ("The Basic Concepts of Critical Thinking," 2013). The arguments I identified would be in these statements that support final claims. The fifth paragraph shows an argument “our community endured the same hard times.” The supporting statement would be Peters father was laid off at the steel mill, then their family did not have enough money for school, and the football season was cancelled due to low funding.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In order to understand how Perry analyzed Walter’s character and diagnosed him as a sufferer of paranoia, similarities between what the typical traits of a person with Paranoia Personality Disorder are classified under and how many of those traits matched Walter’s personality must be examined. PPD is often referred to as being a complex phenomenon. Multiple approaches and…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter the Great, or Peter I, was a man who introduced sweeping changes in Russia during his reign, some that were great for his country, and others that lead to misfortune. Even though he changed many things, historians have argued over whether he was a reformer or revolutionary for many ages past his death. It is more accurate to call him a reformer than a revolutionary, as Peter did introduce changes, but most of them were copied or based off other systems of government, but the public in Russia at the time considered him a revolutionary because they believed he was changing everything to how he saw fit, and because of their ignorance towards the west’s continued advancements. Peter the Great was a reformer through and through.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pov Tell Tale Heart

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In ,"The Tell-Tale Heart," Poe uses a first person point of view which allowed me…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Devotion - Peter didn't have many friends as a child, the only one that really noticed him and cared about him was his best friend Josie. So when Josie betrayed him during middle school, it really lead towards Peter's determination to carry out his plans. Josie never wanted to be mean or non-caring but she just sat by and let the others bully him and even got him fired from Peter's first and only job. Peter was devoted, he showed his faith towards his ex-best friend when he spared her in the last moments of the shooting. He also kept a big secret of Josie's from the world, it was that…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Principle

    • 779 Words
    • 9 Pages

    კანადელმა პედაგოგმა ლოურენს პიტერმა ჩამოაყალიბა დებულება, რომელმაც მას მთელს მსოფლიოში გაუთქვა სახელი. დებულების თანახმად, იერარქიულ ორგანიზაციებში გამუდმებით ხდება კომპეტენტური თანამშრომლების დაწინაურება და თანამშრომლები იღებენ უფრო მაღალ თანამდებობებს მანამ, სანამ იმ დონეს არ მიაღწევენ, რომლის შესაბამისი მოვალეობების შესრულება მათ ძალებს აღემატება. პიტერის პრინციპის თანახმად, იერარქიულ სისტემაში ნებისმიერი თანამშრომელი აღწევს თავისი არაკომპეტენტურობის დონეს. სწორედ აქ, არაკომპეტენტურობის დონეზე, თანამშრომელი მანამ დარჩება, სანამ ორგანიზაციას ან თავისი ნებით არ დატოვებს, ან პენსიაზე არ გავა, ან არ მოკვდება. რაც მეტი თანამშრომელი აღწევს თავისი არაკომპეტენტურობის დონეს, მით უფრო მეტად იკლებს ორგანიზაციის საერთო კომპეტენცია, ეცემა მისი ეფექტიანობა და რეგრესი უწყვეტ პროცესად ყალიბდება. „უკანასკნელი გაჩერების სინდრომი” თვალნათლივ გამოიხატება თანამშრომელთა ქცევაში – სამუშაოს ფორმალიზებისაკენ სწრაფვაში, ახალი ბიუროკრატიული წესების მოგონებაში და ასე შემდეგ. ფაქტობრივად მხოლოდ ისინიღა მუშაობენ ნაყოფიერად, ვისაც თავიანთი არაკომპეტენტურობის დონისთვის ჯერ არ მიუღწევიათ, მაგრამ ასეთების რაოდენობა თანდათან უფრო მცირდება. პიტერის პრინციპი შედეგები: 1. დროთა განმავლობაში, თითოეულ თანამდებობას დაიკავებს თანამშრომელი, რომელიც არაკომპეტენტური იქნება თავისი მოვალეობის შესასრულებლად. 2. საქმეს ის თანამშრომლები აკეთებენ, რომლებსაც ჯერ საკუთარი არაკომპეტენტურობის დონისათვის არ მიუღწევიათ. ეს მოსაზრებები აქტუალური იქნებოდა პიტერის მოღვაწეობის პერიოდში, დღევანდელობაში კი ისინი სხვა სახეს მიიღებდნენ, მაგრამ ამაზე მოგვიანებით... სანამ პიტერის პრინციპებზე გავაგრძელებდეთ საუბარს, გვინდა გაგიზიაროთ ჩვენი მოსაზრება განხილულ საკითხთან დაკავშირებით, ცხადია გადაწყვეტილება კადრის დაწინაურების შესახებ მოდის „ზემოდან“, ესე იგი ამა თუ იმ თანამშრომლის იერარქულ კიბეზე ზევით წანაცვლების გადაწყვეტილებას ზედა რგოლის მენეჯერები იღებენ. ნებისმიერი ნორმალური ორგანიზაციის ნორმალური ზედა რგოლის მენეჯერი უნდა აკვირდებოდეს დაქვემდებარებულის მიღწევებს, პიროვნულ თვისებებს, რამდენად შეესაბამება…

    • 779 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays