Preview

Percy: the Common Reader and the Complex Reader

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
735 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Percy: the Common Reader and the Complex Reader
Percy: The Common Reader and the Complex Reader Walker Percy 's "The Loss of the Creature" is a work to be read … and read again. He questions language and understanding or belief. He writes "piling example upon example" (qtd. in Percy 462). He speaks of the rare sovereign knower and the unique sovereign experience. One will never fully recover an entity into the understanding of the primary founder 's, as try he might. There will only be one sovereign experience. There are many opportunities for one to view the Grand Canyon. The common tourist takes the packaged tour. He sees the canyon the way his travel agent intended. He takes pictures and "measures his satisfaction by the degree to which the canyon conforms to the preformed complex" (qtd. in Percy 463). This simply means he is pleased with his experience, feeling he has not been cheated by the packaged tour. Like the tourist visiting the Grand Canyon, the common reader merely reads the text, however, the spaces between the lines are left unexplored. The common reader might read "The Loss of the Creature," not comprehend Percy 's concepts and dismiss the text comparable to the tourist visiting the canyon, ignoring all of the history, beauty and mystique that has formed this national treasure into the preformed concept that civilization knows it as today. One who reads as a common reader would find that Walker Percy 's "The Loss of the Creature" is a collection of asinine statements laid upon one another generating chaos in their minds, and nothing more. In contrast to the tourist, the sovereign knower opts not to take the packaged tour. He is the one hoping to see the Grand Canyon as Garcia López de Cárdenas saw the Grand Canyon the first time, therefore creating a sovereign experience. To do this he must "avoid the approved confrontation of the tour and Park Service" (qtd. in Percy 464). One way the tourist can create a sovereign experience, hence becoming a sovereign knower is by a


Cited: Percy, Walker. "The Loss of the Creature." Ways of Reasoning: An Anthology for Writers. Ed. David Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky. New York: Bedford, 1990. 461-79

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Loss of the Creature Walker Percy expresses his perspective about the world in various ways. He connects his examples by making them one after another giving symbolic as losing and achieving your goal. Percy tells true experiences with people if they would ignore all the negativity and get rid of it all, life would be much better. On another hand, loss of sovereignty is what is explained by how people make situations gather up to the symbolic complex with their minds. Percy starts off with the Grand Canyon and what Garcia Lopez De Cardenas who first discovered the canyon (Percy, 298) and sees it as a beautiful sight for what it really is as what the government makes it out to be just a natural park that brings in money.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Wood, N. V. (2012). Perspectives on argument. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 536 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Percy Jackson Trial Essay

    • 5248 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Also by Rick Riordan Percy Jackson and the Olympians, Book One: The Lightning Thief Percy Jackson and the Olympians, Book Two: The Sea of Monsters Percy Jackson and the Olympians, Book Three: The Titan’s Curse Percy Jackson and the Olympians, Book Four: The Battle of the Labyrinth Percy Jackson and the Olympians, Book Five: The Last Olympian The Kane Chronicles, Book One: The Red Pyramid…

    • 5248 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Percy's essay The Loss of the Creature, he talks about the sightseer in the Grand Canyon. When looked up in the dictionary, a sightseer is a tourist who is visiting sights of interest. A sightseer can also be described as one given to seeing sights or noted things. This is important because in the essay, Percy talks about the value P and that if the Grand Canyon "is seen by a million sightseers, a single sightseer does not receive value P but a millionth part of value P". The sightseer is the one who perceives the Grand Canyon and will receive a certain amount of value P from that of the Spanish explorer. However, he cannot see the Grand Canyon for what it is when he perceives it according to the symbolic complex in his mind.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gooch, John, and Dorothy U. Seyler. Argument! 2nd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Print.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Loss of the Creature,” Percy focuses on how one perceives something before actually witnessing it based on the opinions of others. The value of the place or idea is already preconceived due to the fact that we are so caught up in time that we overlook the entire experience as a whole. Or being that we are so focused on the option on an object from someone else, we miss the whole concept or what it’s true meaning or “beauty” as Percy state’s is. We lose the ability to make our own decisions because we base them off of someone else’s viewpoints. Using an example of a movie that I experienced shows Percy’s point.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Loss of the Creature,” Walker Percy describes how the modern society presents packaged experience to people and how the true values of experience via confrontation is being ruined because of that “preformed complex” (460). The travelers these days in the Grand Canyon will not see the same values and beauty that Garcia López de Cárdenas did, because they already pre-experienced the values of the Grand Canyon via “appropriated symbolic complex”; Percy describes this as the difference between the “sightseers” and “discoverers,” saying, “the thing is no longer the thing as it confronted” (459). The couple traveling in Mexico, who accidently ends up staying at a town that they never planned to visit, will enjoy their trip. They still are mere “sightseers,” however, even after all those experiences since they desire a certification from someone that their “experience as genuine,” that their trip was not a failure, without wanting to know the actual depth and the meaning of what they went through; “The highest satisfaction of the sightseer is that…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlike Richard Dawkins, Edith Hamilton’s book gives the myths a chance of redemption as the explanations as to why things exist the way they…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles G.D Roberts is known for his 250 odd realistic animal stories published in the contemporary period. These so called realistic animal stories may be thought of as a response to Darwin’s exploration of the connections between man and animal; it is around this time when the “Origin of Species” broke down the barriers between the two. “Do Seek Their Meat from God”, one of Roberts’ animal stories, is no different in its ability to force a comparison between man and beast. With that said, in an essay concerning “Do Seek Their Meat from God” Seifert explains that “Roberts opens the story with a seemingly traditional nineteenth century landscape description… The wilderness is not depicted for its own sake…but directly bears on the theme, plot,…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    White, Thomas I.. "Is a Dolphin a Person?." Discovering philosophy. 2nd ed., Prentice Hall portfolio ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008. 405-428.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Kelly, Joseph. The Seagull Reader - Stories. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2008. 354-72. Print.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sibley, W.M. (1953) “The Rational Versus the Reasonable”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1953), pp.554-560, Philosophical Review, Duke University Press.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can Animals Think

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages

    TASK: Write an essay in which you explain how Linden develops his point of view on the question, “Can animals think?”. Begin by introducing and explaining Linden’s point of view. Then, explain how Linden develops that point of view from the beginning through the middle and to the end of the article. Cite relevant textual evidence to support your analysis of Linden’s point of view. End your essay with a statement that follows from the information you presented on how Linden developed his point of view. Your essay should be written in a formal style for an audience that is familiar with the text and follow the…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes, Thomas. “from Leviathan.” Reading the World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd Ed. Ed. Austin Michael. New York: Norton, 2010.125.Print.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay, "The Loss of the Creature," Walker Percy claims that there are two types of "students:" "privileged" and "unprivileged knowers." However, Percy labels his readers by what he feels is appropriate. According to David Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky in the introduction to Ways of Reading, it is up to us, the readers, to determine what Percy might mean when he uses key terms and phrases in his essay. Bartholomae and Petrosky believe that "The meaning is forged from reading the essay, to be sure, but it is determined by your account of what Percy might mean when he talks about ‘symbolic packages' or a ‘loss of sovereignty' (8)." Yet Percy only believes in his ideas because of his elitist point of view and feels as though he is the "privileged knower" who knows how to correctly experience life. I mostly disagree with what Percy says in his essay because he makes several valid arguments, but ultimately contradicts and shoots his own ideas down. I believe that I am an "unprivileged" knower, yet I still have the ability to see things for what they truly are (or as Percy would say, I have not lost my "sovereignty"). My argument is that sovereignty is possible and that it does not require an "expert" like Walker Percy to guide an "unprivileged knower." And I am confident that we, the readers, believe that he is unable to speak for all of us. Moreover, Bartholomae and Petrosky offer readers a way to read Percy, which will allow their own interpretation to be correct and "not be exactly what Percy said" (8). We should all have our own "experiential, emotional sovereignty" to determine what an authentic experience truly is.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays