A frequent criticism of the person-centered approach is that delivering the core conditions is what all good therapists do anyway, before they move on to applying their expertise and do. Another criticism as mentioned by Dr. Wade Hannon, is that the person centered approach is a long process (Hannon, 2006). However, with person center approach there is not a time limit. Dr Wade Hannon goes on to mention the many cases were two or three sessions were needed and other cases were more time was needed (Hannon et. al, 2006). Dr. Hannon goes on to say that person centered approach is not flourishing in the United States because the approach is people are now being looked at to manipulate and that is part of because the person centered approach (Hannon, et al, 2006). As we know the society is not interested in these things unless it’s something that can be used as a money maker.
It seems likely
References: http://www.lotusink.co.uk/counselling_11.html Kirschenbaum, H., & Jourdan, A. (2005). The Current Status of Carl Rogers and the Person-Centered Approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(1), 37-51. doi:10.1037 Hannon, W. (Speaker). (2006). The person-centered approach in counseling [Podcast Recording No. CAS048]. Kent, OH: CounselorAudioSource.net. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.counseloraudiosource.net/feeds/cas048.mp3