Preview

Personal Response To Bonilla-Silva Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1241 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personal Response To Bonilla-Silva Summary
Personal Response to Bonilla-Silva
Eduardo Bonilla-Silva is a professor of Sociology at Duke University with the associations of race. In America race is known as an enormous issue for many years. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva discusses the new racism in his book, The Linguistics of Color Blind Racism:
How to Talk Nasty about Blacks without Sounding “Racist”. Color blind to racism is held to have led to the segregation of the white race from other minorities called white habitus. Color blind racism and white habitus has affected many people for example it segregate white from non-white by promoting a white culture of harmony and it give nonwhite and people of color a negative view, whom don’t even realize that they are, or will be affected. Color blind to racism is an “ideology emerged as part of the great racial transformation that occurred in the late sixties and early seventies in the United States,” according to Bonilla-Silva (42). Bonilla- Silva evaluate color blind to racism frequently on interview data. In 1997 Silva carry out Survey of Social Attitudes of College Students and also in 1998 in Detroit Area Study (DAS). Bonilla-Silva then breaks down the analysis of color blind racism into several theory. There is one particular theory that Silva argue about is cultural
…show more content…
White people are against affirmative action because they think it unfair and racist or reverse discrimination so that one of the biggest aspect why white people are against affirmative action. Further, most white think they less likely to get a particular job or getting into a better school than a black or person of color because of affirmative action. The essence of the American version of this frame is “blaming the victim,” arguing that minorities’ standing is a product of their lack of effort, loose family organization, and inappropriate values,” stated Bonilla-Silva

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Affirmative action was a policy set into place to even the playing field for all races, religion, gender or national origin. In his article “Whites Swim in Racial Preference” Tim Wise gives an in depth view of racial preference of Whites versus any other race. Even though affirmative action has been set into place, Whites still have the advantage to excel since they are given more opportunities and advantages simply because of their race. One of the examples that is used by Tim Wise is the point systems that is used by the University of Michigan has set up an even though 20 additional points for minority groups even after it is all totaled…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silva’s Frames of Color-Blind Racism provide the logic used by governmental leaders to explain the place dominance has in a society. In addition, the frames demonstrate how dominance is managed and maintained in a society. Abstract Liberalism, Naturalization, Cultural Racism, and Minimization of Racism are the four frames that Silva introduces. Since Anti-racialism, as defined by Goldberg is opposing the categorizing of people according to their outward characteristics, Goldberg’s frames Naturalization and Cultural Racism do not support anti-racialism. Naturalization makes it possible to deny racism by attributing racist behavior to occurrences that are said to happen naturally e.g. white and blacks do not live in integrated neighborhoods because…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this lecture the speaker, Eduardo Bonilla- Silvia, talked about how racism has progressed over the years. He started off by talking about how color-blind racism is the new ideology in America. Eduardo explained that color-blind racism is a way of discriminating colored individuals without being “racist”. It has come to the extent that white people are unlikely to experience disadvantages and overlook racism as a whole. He said that most of the time people don’t even acknowledge that they are being racist because of the new civilized version of racism.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first chapter of his book Racism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva argues that color-blind racism, a new racial ideology which emerged in the late 1960s (16), has become “a formidable political tool” for “the maintenance of the racial order” and “white privilege” in the “post-Civil Rights era” (3). According to his argument about color-blind racism, in contemporary America, although few whites appear like racists, racial inequality does exist everywhere (2). Racism changed from “overt means” of discrimination to “subtle and institutional practices” (3). “Nonracial dynamics” become “white common sense” about explanations…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The instituting of affirmative action policy originates from a specific assessment of a nation’s past which is an essential demand for compensation measured by societies with a history of discrimination or a history of suppressing economic prospects centered on race or national derivation. Countries that reject the notions of affirmative action feel that color blind laws already exist and that these laws delegate and ensure that all races are treated equally. Countries promoting affirmative action feel that formerly oppressed groups are entitled to…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stability of racism in the United States has changed over centuries of its existence. Instead, racism shifts and molds into often unrecognizable ways that fit seamlessly into the fabric of the American consciousness to make it utterly invisible to the majority of white Americans. In the current era of political thinking, colorblindness, or society’s unwillingness to discuss or even recognize race in any way, seems to be the dominant perspective. Michelle Alexander, in her book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness shatters this dominantly held ideology.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Colorblins In Race

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this excerpt, from the novel “Clashing Views in Race and Ethnicity,” two views are stated on the concept of a “color-blind” society. The person in support of a society as such, was a black man, with a mixed-racial background. He viewed these racial categorizations present today, on the same continuum used during Jim Crow and slavery. Overall, he cringed at the thought of division due to race from other groups of people. I believe his take was a form of ignorance. A colorblind society to him, a black man, is to not label him by his race. A colorblind society to white people, specifically those that are racist, is to ignore the existence of race that they have fabricated, and racist acts that they have committed against minority groups. A…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racism has an economic, political and health factor, as many leaders in the world as well as average citizen’s use race as a motivating factor to make decisions. Presently, a countless number of people whose social imagination has been obscured like to believe that racism is so ambiguous in the post-civil rights generation that indubitably it ceases to stand. Royster Deidre’s book which is titled “Race and the Invisible Hand: How White Networks Exclude Black Men from Blue-Collar Job” falsifies this understanding and gives American racism a palpable image.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    These elements tend to foster pride for individual identity; denying people their identities is not indicative of racial progress, rather it is a step backwards, placing us in America’s rampant tendencies of racism whilst attempting to conceal unequal power structures of America. The denials of identities have led to dehumanizing situations. During the late 19th and early 20th century, America created initiatives for Indian Boarding Schools, which were used for the purpose of forced assimilation of Natives. These schools were used to “kill the Indian, save the Man.”, and impacted the culture, language, and traditions of Natives. This attempt of enforced assimilation is drastic but correlates highly with thought processes of the minimization of race. Colorblindness tends to equate race to something negative with phrases like “I don’t see color, I just see people.”. What these people are saying when they claim colorblindness, is that they see people despite their race. Many people in modern day society claim colorblindness, saying that race is not a characteristic that they see nor is it one they use to form any opinions about another person. White people use the colorblindness argument assuming that seeing race would lead to their demarcation as racist. The fear of discussing topics related to race and ethnicity reinforces the idea that having a racial and ethnic identity other than whiteness is wrong. But rejecting to discuss topics of race and ethnicity proves that to some degree, these people hold prejudices and thoughts about other races they have yet to challenge, and are not willing to critically analyze their position in society which allows them to opt out of discussion on race. By discussing race, it is reaffirmed that there is nothing wrong with having a racial and ethnic identity, rather the problem lies with the structure and makeup of our…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative action is clearly favoring minority groups, and giving them an undeserved advantage. An example of this discrimination is clear, a statistic from the New York Times shows that after affirmative action was banned in California, the number of Hispanics and blacks accepted at UC Berkeley, and UC LA dropped sharply. Every time a college bases its decision on who to accept based on race or color, the racial tensions between minorities and majorities will rise in American…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an article written by, Texas A&M University Sociology Professor Eduardo Bonilla-Silva called, The Linguistics of Color Blind Racism: How to Talk Nasty about Blacks without Sounding Racist, Bonilla-Silva carefully explains and analyzes the different tactics employed by whites to make comments with racist undertones without outwardly sounding racist that aid in maintaining the racial ideology known as color blind racism. The basis of Bonilla-Silva’s research was supplied from an array of different people, some being university students from the state of Michigan, and the others being residents of the Detroit metropolitan area, who each then participated in different interviews conducted by various groups. Based on the responses of the interviewees,…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Colorblindness

    • 764 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fact that colorblindness encourages us to ignore the issue of race and racism actually can make racism worse. Colorblind universalism suggests that instead of focusing on particular races or racism in general, we should create opportunities or universal programs to uplift all people in jobs, education, and health care. However, it is important to note that the white public probably does not view this ‘social policy’ in the same way that the creators of this idea do. According to many whites, the efforts made in universal uplifts such as more funding in schools, job creations, and universal health care are proposed in order to assist people of color. Because of this, clearly, racism is simply supported and perhaps more likely to occur as people catch on to this particular view of this social policy.…

    • 764 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a country the size of the United States, different races and different views on the equality of each race exist. Affirmative Action was a put in place by the Federal Government to help conserve the protection of rights towards minorities, whether it be determined by race or sex, during the time after the civil war when they people were still being discriminated upon based on these two aspects. Affirmative Action created a situation that allowed minorities a guaranteed spot within a workplace or a school, eliminating racism and allowing the minority to be recognized for its accomplishments. This may not have been the best solution for the problem but at the time it was put in place it was a necessary mean to try and correct an evil. Affirmative Action is still in place today even though it shouldn’t be. It creates discrimination by trying to get rid of it. Administration officers and CEO’s of companies feel the need to fill the percentage that they were given so they turn their backs on more qualified persons. With Affirmative Action, a white man may lose a chance to get a job or go to college, simply because the position must be filled with a black man, to meet the designated quota assigned. Also majorities look down on the minorities who get into colleges and get jobs over them by saying that they only got the job because someone just needed to get the spot filled so that they wouldn’t get shut down. This makes the minority feel worse about themselves because really don’t know if they got into the school or got the job based on their own merits or not. People in todays society want to make the most money possible so they will hire who they believe will do the best job whether it be an African American woman or a middle aged white man. Affirmative Action was a necessary step to correct the wrong doings of our ancestors, but is not the correct solution,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Critical Race Theory

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Firstly, The authors introduce the readers to The Critical Race Theory(CRT). The theory has many core components which include “[t]he permanence of racism, critique of liberalism, whiteness of property....”(600). CRT revolves around the permanence of racism, so this…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Color blindness or also referred to as race blindness is the exclusion of race in the assessment of a human being. Color blindness is a new concept that strives to mineralize racial discrimination. Our society has strived to find a state of colorblindness but has yet to succeed. Past discriminations have hindered the progress of colorblindness in society. Due to racism in the past many hurdles were created for minorities to overcome in the present. Hurdles such as poverty and negative stereotypes. These hurdles in turn have made it hard for our society to truly become color blind. The racism from the past has made our society unable to truly practice colorblindness because it has caused individual, institutional, and systemic discrimination in the present.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays