Preview

Personality and U.S. Presidents in the 21st Century

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1724 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personality and U.S. Presidents in the 21st Century
Liz Flanders
PoliSci 391
Personality and U.S. Presidents in the 21st Century Paper
10.19.10

The presidency of the United States is arguably the most important position to hold in the entire country. The president is the figurehead of the country; the person people look to for reassurance and the person they blame when something goes wrong. Of the forty-four presidents that our country has seen to this day, each of them has their own distinct character and personality. Some will argue that the personality of the president shapes their performance in office. One of these people is James Barber, author of the book The Presidential Character. In his book, Barber makes an argument concerning the impact of personality and presidential performance. He believes that the character of the president matters above all, and through his system of personality types, citizens will be advised in choosing the right president through some clear criteria. Barber organizes his theory of presidential character into four different trait-based dimensions. The first two dimensions are activity and passivity, measuring how much energy and activity each person devotes to his presidency. The last two dimensions are positive and negative affect, measuring the person’s feelings about what they do as president, whether they experience political life as happy or sad, enjoyable or discouraging. These baselines lead into four basic character patterns – active-positive, active-negative, passive-positive and passive negative. Barber argues that every president of the United States can be placed into one of these categories. Active-positive Presidents would be highly energetic and active, while truly enjoying their duties as president and having high levels of self-esteem. They would be flexible and adaptive to different situations and set specific goals to achieve. Sometimes active-positive presidents can get into trouble from a sense of arrogance and lack of understanding why others do not



Bibliography: Baker, Peter. "Education of a President." The New York Times 12 Oct. 2010: 1-8. Dickinson, Tim. "The Case for Obama." Rolling Stone Magazine 13 Oct. 2010: 1-5.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard Neustadt

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Writing in 1960, Richard Neustadt is an important political theorist focusing on the US Presidency. Neustadt’s work was a reaction to the “old institutionalism” represented by writers like Edwin Corwin. Neustadt takes a behaviorist approach to understanding presidential power, and argues that the real functional power of the US president arises from his “power to persuade”.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warren Harding, 29th president of the United States, was known as one of the worst presidents ever. Despite this common belief, Harding made many great accomplishments while in office. According to the Barber article, the type of characteristic that fits Harding the best is passive-positive. His attitude towards many of the things he did was almost always positive. However, Harding served with a divided government, which made it challenging for some of his main policy ideas to pass. Harding also had a very difficult staff working with him. Their scandalous and inappropriate behavior made Harding’s job as president difficult. He would often go along with what they wanted, instead of using his power to get things done the way he had planned. He lacked the authoritative power that his position granted him.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. How much weight should Americans give to the “character issue” in deciding whether to vote for a presidential candidate? Do the mass media give too much or too little attention to the character issue?…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ranks high in conscientiousness. Extraversion is strongly correlated with sociability and somewhat correlated with activity. Leslie is high in all three of these. Of the big five, agreeableness is mildly correlated with sociability as well. Leslie is in the middle of agreeableness, and is high in sociability, so you can see the smaller correlation between the two.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Write about your president’s childhood through college here. This section should be the shortest part of your paper.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Hoxie p. 717), what it is in fact is the product of a 200 year old debate over…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pol Sci

    • 1031 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Dickerson, John. "How to Measure for a President." Slate. The Slate Group, 26 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Mar. 2015. <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/features/2012/how_to_measure_a_president_/what_qualities_should_we_look_for_in_our_presidents_.html>…

    • 1031 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of a presidential candidate since Washington has been seen as one that can only be fulfilled by those with a strong yet graceful sense of leadership. Current President Donald Trump has quickly risen through the ranks of politics and straight into the white house. With no political background experience, one would think that this candidate came to office by possessing those same active positive characteristics as our first president. However, Trumps character can be seen as compulsive, aggressive and power driven. These characteristics have placed President Trump in the active negative category which I will explain through direct examples.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regan V Carter

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The election of 1980 was a key turning point in American politics. To present day, American’s still have strong feelings and opinions about their former President, Jimmy Carter. The result from the 1980 election, led to the appointment of Ronald Reagan as the 40th President of the United States of America, and the Republicans gained control of the Senate for the first time in twenty-five years. There are several reasons behind the animosity of American’s towards Jimmy Carter at the time and in present day. Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party were preferred over President Carter and the Democratic Party due to international and domestic issues that were occurring at the time of the 1980 election. The international issues were centred round the Iran Hostage situation, the Panama Canal Treaties and President Carter’s actions towards the Soviet Government. On the home front, the President was under scrutiny by the public due to his political pardons and his handling of the economy including high inflation rates and high unemployment. President Carter was also under scrutiny from conservative political and religious groups as to his ‘liberal’ policies that he had enacted during his term in office. In addition to the previous mentioned topics, the personality traits of Jimmy Carter were also examined during the 1980 election.…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johnson, J. A., Musial, D., & Hall, G. E. (2005). Introduction to the foundations of American education…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Link to or copy and paste the following on your web browser so you can watch the following video on "The Nature of A President."…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While a range of factors, such as world events and political realities, determine what political leaders can and will do in office, foundational tendencies in human personality, whose differ dramatically from one leader to the next, are among them. Trump’s personality is certainly extreme by any standard, and particularly rare for…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact, out of the twenty modern presidents, eight have been extroverts. This is curious, due to the fact that in America, the percentage of extroverts to introverts is roughly fifty-fifty (Hollister, 2006a). The ratio of extroverts to introverts among the US presidents is forty to sixty, meaning that introverts are more likely to be elected. Yet, even with that considered, the majority of extroverted presidents are on the upper half of the popularity scale, which displays a connection between extroverted presidents and…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quader describes Obama’s leadership style as “inspirational” and Clinton’s as “pragmatic.” When comparing their leadership and personalities to Boseman’s 2008 study on the traits followers desire in leaders, Obama was more honest, forward-looking, and inspiring than Clinton, while Clinton was more competent for the position than Obama. Although Obama had the African-American and male votes and Clinton carried the white and female voters, Obama won the Democratic Party Nominee Election because he was more trustworthy based on his…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fourthly, the author dwells upon the relations between the Congress and a President. Gloria Borger states that Bush must use something besides his charm to be able to deal with the US legislative body. All in all, Ms. Borger examines strengths and weaknesses of George Bush’s managerial style. The author also dwells upon the essential attributes of the presidency and what differs it form a CEO…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays