Preview

Persuasive Essay On Cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Cloning
The purpose of this piece formal writing is to inform the scientists that are coming very close to making this happen, about how de-extinction can be good and bad for the future world. This piece of writing should be sent to scientists that are going to do this and it should also be put on science websites that have other pieces of writing like this.

De-extinction is when someone creates an organism that is the same or similar to an extinct species. Cloning has been the most common that scientists have been trying to achieve. Some of the animals that they are trying to bring back are the passenger pigeon and the woolly mammoth, they plan to do this by extracting DNA fragments from preserved animals they have. Cloning only can work if they
…show more content…
Would it also change the way we think about looking after the animals that we have, it might make us think that it doesn’t matter the way we treat animals because we could just bring them back if the species dies? If we were to bring some species back do we know what sort of viruses these animals carry, one of these viruses could be a mega-virus that could kill the entire human race? Depending on what animals we bring back some of these animals have been dead for millions of years and would be completely foreign to the environment we live in now. If we start bringing back animals it may also change our priorities and make us focus more on bringing back animals than trying to solve medical problems we have at the moment.

De-extinction is a big step forward in science, de-extinction could provide us with knowledge of evolution and animals that we have never seen. It could also have a lot of environmental benefits such as some damaged ecosystems could be repaired by some extinct species of plants and animals. We can also redeem ourselves for what we have done to this planet we can bring back some animals and plants that are extinct because we made them go extinct. It can also be used to save the animals that are going extinct now so they won't die

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sci/207 Week 4 Lab 4 Report

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Biomes and Diversity. As you have learned in the readings, extinction is a natural selection process. You have also read that humans are often responsible for accelerating this process. Using at least two scholarly sources, address whether or not we as humans should be concerned with the extinction rate. Additionally, discuss whether or not humans strive to preserve representative samples of all biomes on the planet…

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci 207 Week 1

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We should be concerned with the extinction and try and preserve the biomes and ecosystems that are present. Over time the ecosystem and biomes have evolved changed in some form or fashion that will leave us in difference from this particular time now. It’s important to have something to be able to look back on for information and or instructions on how to change things that we as human may make a mistake and mess up.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart Pimm offers a degree in Conservation Ecology from Duke University. His Argument focuses largely on humans are not ready for De-Extinction in that since humans were the ones that pushed them to disappear, they are not going to want those species back. He gives the example that “hunters at [the Pyrenean ibex] to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito every eaten.” He notes that the problem is whether we can resurrect these species or not, but more along the lines of whether the rest of the population will accept the animals back in their original homes. He also believes that De-Extinction “seduces” those granting research money and support into thinking they are doing well when it simply gives “unscrupulous developers a veil to hide their rapaciousness, with promises to fix things later.”…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “De-extinction Probably isn’t Worth it”. This is the name of an article by Sarah Zielinski. I completely understand what she is talking about in her text, and I agree with her. De-extinction isn’t worth it mainly because it would take attention from other research, harm living creatures, and most of their habitats and food are gone.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ1 WK1

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page

    Should humans be concerned with the extinction rate? Yes, we should think about how our actions affect every living organism within our ecosystem, as we all share and is dependent on its resources. Over population, over-consumption, and consumerism are some of the reasons that our environment is in its current condition. As the earth’s population increases, the use of natural resources increases. More and more the impact of humans on the environment is becoming a greater issue for our society. As humans we are dependent upon the environment for its raw materials we use for food and shelter. “The demands of industrialization require that we use our natural resources in order to run our technology. However, the demands of future generations mean that we must use these resources wisely and in a sustainable manner so that society does not stop because of our lack of concern” (Weinclaw, 2009). It would be in the best interest of our future generations that we strive to preserve samples of biomes by limiting our footprint on those that we can.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, although involvement to save endangered animals in sometimes necessary, its necessity is hinged on whether it affects the human species directly, and or will negatively affect the longevity of us as a species…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The process of de-extinction or resurrection biology is in simple words, “the process of resurrecting species that have died out, or gone extinct” (Encyclopedia Britannica). While it may sound like a simple idea, it is anything but that. Stewart Brand, a professional environmentalist and futurist who is leading one of the biggest de-extinction projects, explains that there are three semi-successful techniques to…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While discussion of human cloning is an ongoing debate, the idea of cloning organs is sought after. There is new technology that is trying to do this by printing out organs. Essentially, by using a 3D printer, organs can be created using a patient’s own cells. So far, it is easier to print out certain types of cells, such as skin cells. More complicated organs, such as kidneys and livers are harder to replicate because their structure has a more diverse, complicated plethora of cells. It is also very difficult to keep these cells alive after printing them. Although the 3-D printing of organs is very limited today, there is hope in the future that these organs can be replicated successfully. Being able to replicate human organs will lead to many medical advancements, such as in surgery, education, and research.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you had the chance to bring a loved one back into this world to stop your pain, would you? Cloning, the process of taking a cell from one organism, taking a donor womb cell from another organism of the same species (which will not affect the clone’s genetic identity), inserting the original cell in the donor cell, and placing the newly developed embryo inside a surrogate mother. There are those who think that cloning is a wonderful idea and that it is acceptable to make life, from and identical to that which already exists. One reason people protest the idea of cloning is because many are mystified as to how it could be used and what its purposes can be. I know that if it were your child, you would use every possible measure to keep them alive. The fact that we, as humans, might be able to figure out how to clone so that lives could be saved is extremely exciting and inspiring. “With so much enhancement in medical science, cloning is slowly but surely looking like it could be in our near future. However, is it really an option…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an NBC news article, the author stated, “Scientists are one step closer to bringing a woolly mammoth back to life” (Ghose). Her statement proves that animal cloning is not a dream or idea anymore. It is now a reality and scientist from all around the world are utilizing animal cloning. Cloning in general has evolved its technology over the years and has become more advanced. In fact, author Jacqueline Langwith wrote an article on animal cloning, which started, “Animal cloning has entered the world of horse racing and other equestrian sports.” (Langwith). Many people are excited to clone their favorite or most successful horse. An example that Jacqueline cited was, “An Italian Haflinger foal named Prometea was the first cloned horse” (Langwith). However, cloning is a new type of science that is…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jurassic Park dinosaurs are resurrected for their entertainment value. The disastrous consequences that follow have cast a shadow over the notion of de-extinction, at least in the popular imagination. But people tend to forget that Jurassic Park was pure fantasy. In reality the only species we can hope to revive now are those that died within the past few tens of thousands of years and left behind remains that harbor intact cells or, at the very least, enough ancient DNA to reconstruct the creature’s genome. Because of the natural rates of decay, we can never hope to retrieve the full genome of Tyrannosaurus rex, which vanished about 65 million years ago. The species theoretically capable of being revived all disappeared while humanity was rapidly climbing toward world domination. And especially in recent years we humans were the ones who wiped them out, by hunting them, destroying their habitats, or spreading diseases.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carl Zimmer discusses the idea of bringing back a species from extinction throughout his essay. With examples such as the Pyrenean ibex, mammoths, passenger pigeons, and gastric brooding frogs, he discusses how technology and science have advanced to the point that de-extinction is close to being a reality. Zimmer then shifts to the benefits and problems that could arise if we are able to revive an extinct species. As a result, Zimmer raises the question that should we bring back an extinct species just because we can? Even though there is a possibility of bringing back species from extinction, I personally believe that we should prioritize preventing extant species from facing extinction over reviving extinct species.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Extinction works by removing a reinforcement behavior to eliminate a problem. At first glance the extinction procedure looks to me like a punishment, however it allows authority figure to eradicated a concern without being the bad guy. For instance, if an employed keeps coming late by 15 minutes and they haven’t seen any damage in they paycheck; As you begin deducting time from their pay check the employee most likely will be on time.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reanimate False Species

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The controversial issue that Please Reanimate and Do Not Reanimate address is that we can revive species that could possibly help our ecosystems and save modern day species of animals from going extinct; but on the other hand, reviving “extinct species poses a risk of selling the public on a false promise that technology alone can solve our ongoing environmental woes.” Reviving certain species could give ecosystems that depend on “keystone species” that have lost the species diversity they once had because some species no longer fit. And as environmental change occurs, ancient diversity may be needed again. The ability to reanimate extinct species would be perfect for this situation. But with the public rationalizing that researchers can…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays