Persuasive Essay On Life Without Parole
Do you want a person who rapes, murders people or even acts extreme violence to hurt you or a loved one? There are families out there that lose a loved one to an adolescent just because they wanted to see what it's like to kill another human being. These families are the ones that suffer and can never get back what they lost. These teenagers do deserve a sentence of life without parole because they have committed such heinous crimes. I agree with the minority of the Supreme Court Justices who believe in mandatory life without parole because those adolescents broke the law, you must think about the victim’s family, and these teenagers killed another human being and planned to do so.
Although, these teenagers do not have fully developed brains …show more content…
Then, a prosecuting lawyer who is defending your sister and you must testify against this guy. So, the day comes where you meet your sister’s killer. You are already grieving her death along with the unborn niece you could have meet. You’re there walking into the courthouse with all of this sadness and pain, to find out this man that took something from you ends up being this seventeen year old boy. “My youngest sister was the joy of our close family. When a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in suburban Chicago, she was pregnant with their first child.” (Jenkins 1). She died before being able to start her own family. Jennifer has been grieving for the last twenty-seven years, thinking of what could have been Now that the murdered has done what pleased him the most, what about the victim's family. “Some can never recover” (Jenkins 1). In my opinion I feel and truly believe that is true. How do you recover from losing someone who meant the world to you? “The national campaign to end JLWOP has spent millions of dollars advocating for these convicted murderers to be set free. Not a dime has been allocated for victim outreach or support” (Jenkins 2). These killers get to be privileged behind bars even even though they are the ones who committed first degree murder, while the families whom have lost a part of them they
Although, these teenagers do not have fully developed brains …show more content…
Then, a prosecuting lawyer who is defending your sister and you must testify against this guy. So, the day comes where you meet your sister’s killer. You are already grieving her death along with the unborn niece you could have meet. You’re there walking into the courthouse with all of this sadness and pain, to find out this man that took something from you ends up being this seventeen year old boy. “My youngest sister was the joy of our close family. When a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in suburban Chicago, she was pregnant with their first child.” (Jenkins 1). She died before being able to start her own family. Jennifer has been grieving for the last twenty-seven years, thinking of what could have been Now that the murdered has done what pleased him the most, what about the victim's family. “Some can never recover” (Jenkins 1). In my opinion I feel and truly believe that is true. How do you recover from losing someone who meant the world to you? “The national campaign to end JLWOP has spent millions of dollars advocating for these convicted murderers to be set free. Not a dime has been allocated for victim outreach or support” (Jenkins 2). These killers get to be privileged behind bars even even though they are the ones who committed first degree murder, while the families whom have lost a part of them they