Preview

Phil 101

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1660 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phil 101
Philosophy 101
Ivan Karamazov and “The Grand Inquisitor”
Introduction
In understanding “The Grand Inquisitor” and chapters taken from The Brothers Karamazov, the heart of Ivan’s search is a philosophical question: if God is almighty, why would God allow people to suffer? While this line of questioning can be seen as attacking faith by asking why God punishes people, it opens the door to understanding that faith requires willingness. Ivan Karamazov’s rejection of secular and Westernized faith can also be seen as the failed struggle of trying to find a God he can believe in. Ivan says he wants to get to know his estranged brother Alyosha (Dostoevsky, 1993, p. 1), but Ivan is lost and faithless, primarily because Ivan is unwilling to believe in God when he sees so much suffering in the world. Aloysha cuts to the heart of the estrangement between the two of them when he asks Ivan how he can love without having God in his heart (Dostoevsky, 1993, pp. 36-37). This sense of Ivan’s lack of faith, therefore, explains the balance between the Roman Catholic sense of happiness and well-being and the Protestant sense of individual freedom and dignity: Ivan is trying to find a truth that he is willing to accept. He is trying to come to believe and his struggle is between faith and doubt. The clearest way to understand Ivan’s doubt is to see that he is using logic to examine the evidence of God, but he is doing it in a despairing and skeptical fashion that rejects God because it rejects crimes that are perpetrated by humans. Dostoevsky, clearly, is using Ivan to represent the dismissal of religion and God, especially in terms of how Ivan does not believe that faith can be reasonable or logical. In many ways Ivan’s story feels like it is preaching or a type of parable. Ivan is putting forth his own principles and beliefs and the only reason that it is not a one-sided argument is because Alyosha is present for the conversation and occasionally interjects. What Ivan presents

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 101

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A. Protrusion of the disk material may impinge on nerve roots that exit through intervertebral foramina.…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Fr. Walter Cizek faced many trials throughout his many years in Soviet Russia. Among the most testing of these trials were his years spent at the prison in Lubianka, being interrogated as a “Vatican spy.” Kept in isolation and left to his thoughts for years on end, he often turned to God and bible passages for support. However, even after all his prayer; he still fell to an interrogator’s methods. Turning once more to more fervent prayer, he comes to a realization that he had been praying all the wrong things. He recalls Jesus in the garden of Olives before his crucifixion, how he let God’s will be done. From then on, he strived to live following that principle in all things he did.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin Dbq Essay

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Solzhenitsyn, Alexander . One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich or Odin den’ Ivana…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel, Crime and Punishment, riddles its characters with physical, sexual, and psychological violence. Thomas C. Foster asserts in the chapter “More than it’s Going to Hurt You: Concerning Violence” of How to Read Literature like a Professor that no violence exists for its own sake; Rather, violence is useful in contributing to the novel’s overall message. Crime and Punishment is powerful demonstrating the control of conscience, guilt and otherwise, over the life of man. Quite typically violence erupts due to a sick combination of id and ego. The relationship between Semyon Zaharovitch Marmeladov, a town drunk of St. Petersburg, and his children and spouse, Katerina Ivanovna, is built upon a myriad of violence catalyzed by guilt. This relationship is the quintessence of lives tyrannized by guilt resulting in a vicious circle of ferocity.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan is describing his 16th-century poem, which occurs during the Spanish Inquisition in Seville, to his brother Alyosha. Characterized by strong religious undertones and a suffering inquisitor, Ivan's poem leaves Alyosha deeply troubled and confused by the questions of freedom, mortality, and true happiness. Ivan’s work, however, is how he makes himself heard; he voices his struggle with the unfairness of the world through the Grand Inquisitor. “Suppose… one of them, at least, is like my old inquisitor, who himself… raved, overcoming his flesh, in order to make himself free and perfect, but who still loved mankind all his life, and suddenly opened his eyes and saw that there is no great moral blessedness in achieving perfection of the will only to become convinced, at the same time, that millions of the rest of God’s creatures have been set up only for mockery.” This leads Ivan into contact with the existential concept of the Absurd. The absurd in existentialism is the idea that there is no meaning in the world beyond what we give it, and due to the absurdity of the world, anything could happen to anyone at any time. There is no protection found in one’s morality; “good” and “bad” people experience tragedy with no discrimination. Such “absurdity” contributes to Ivan’s distrust in the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grand Inquisitor Analysis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Megalomania and the lust for power have never been more brilliantly portrayed than by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, the famous Russian novelist, who represented this type in the character of the Grand Inquisitor. In his short story of the same title, a fictional Jesus returns to earth in the sixteenth century to face a corrupt Church. As head of the church, the Grand Inquisitor had a long and intriguing conversation with Jesus right before condemning him to death. Jesus faithfully believes what man needs more than anything else in his life is freedom from the oppressive yoke of the divinely Mosaic Law. By having this freedom, people can decide freely on what is good and bad for themselves without consciously thinking of what God told him to do. But the Grand Inquisitor explained to Jesus that truth and freedom are sources human anxiety and because of that in deep down people really don’t want to be free due to the fact that they are fragile, violent, worthless, and seditious. The Grand Inquisitor stated that human race can only be happy when give up their freedom and bow before miracle, mystery, and authority. Is only then that people live and die peacefully. The Grand Inquisitor noted that beyond the grave, people will find nothing but death. He continued but we will keep this as a secret, and for their happiness we will promise them with the reward of heaven and eternity.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ivan Ilyich Thesis

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout his life, Ivan was convinced that a successful life was measured by adapting to, and meeting, the expectations of the bourgeois society in which he lived. Tolstoy described the standards that the society expected one to adhere to as “proper” and “decorous”. Ivan pursued those standards with blind ignorance much “as a moth is to light” (44). Rather than looking to his inner self, developing his own set of values and living a moral life according to those values, Ivan lived a hollow life detached from emotional ties, always doing what he thought others would accept as being the right conduct. His interpersonal relationships, including his marriage, were perfunctory and served merely to advance his social status or promote his own agenda. As a result, the relationships were superficial, self-serving, and materialistic and towards the end of his life, resulted in Ivan being isolated, terrified and in great despair at a time when he needed compassion and true friendship the most. Ivan did not realize until his death was imminent that in order to live a fulfilled and right life, he should have shunned material things and superficial relationships, and instead, he should have embraced love, compassion, and spirituality throughout his…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan does not accept God's ethical system of "allowing" evil to occur, because he believes that God is omnipotent and has the power to stop it. On the other, Swinburne might comment by mentioning how Ivan uses the fallacy of ad populum by involving God when God has nothing to do with the choices people make; since God, like a good father delegating responsibility, gave us free will to use it for good, but humans are the cause for evil since they use free will to harm rather than help. I would rebuttal as to ask Ivan if he truly believes God allows evil in the world then he must also agree that there is no such thing as free will. With a divine being, being the cause of everything evil in the world, then us, humans, have no power or responsibility over the choices we make. Therefore, there is no purpose in rejecting God's ethical system since you are determined to obey his ethical system and you would have no control over your own actions just as everyone else. Lastly, Swinburne and I might conclude to say that Ivan has a biased argument due to his specific view on the suffering of children, as mentioned in the chapter Rebellion, and not the overall aspect of…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Anna Karenina and Brothers Karamazov novel, Anna cheated her husband the same with Dimitri who fell in love to Grushenka while he is engaged to Katerina. As we can remember, Dimitri was attracted to Katerina and they had sex, later on had seen and fell in love to Grushenka which makes the situation complicated.Because Katerina is already in love with him and on the other hand Dimitri wants to leave her and marry Grushenka. Now, one of the Ten Commandments of the Lord is that “Thou Shall Not Commit Adultery”, which has been committed by Anna Karenina and Dimitri. Though Dimitri and Katenina had not yet married but still he betrayed her in a way that his not honest with his feelings. In Christianity, no matter how small or big your reason is,it is still cheating and it is a sin. Especially committing an adultery to the person whom you had promised to give your love and life forever.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pseudo-questions: Asking a question based on a false premise. "Why does the Obama administration want to punish poor people?" A political pundit might ask this question about the proposed health care plan in which Americans will be required to buy insurance. 


Equivocation: Relying on two meanings of a word to make your point; changing the meaning partway through the argument. "I'm not prejudiced. Some of my best friends are black." This argument takes advantage of different meanings of the word "prejudiced". On the one hand, it can mean actively or knowingly disliking people of a particular race or ethnic group. But on the other hand, it can also mean having under-the-surface, unconscious stereotypes. Most people probably have the second kind of "prejudice", even if it's subconscious. 


Ad hominem: attacking the person instead of the issue; name-calling. "Arnold Schwarzenegger is a muscle-bound lunkhead who doesn't know what's best for this state." This would be a personal attack on an individual that doesn't at all address any kinds of arguments or issues.

Mere assertion: Stating something but not giving any reason for it. "God doesn't exist." The most common atheist "argument" is no argument at all but simply a statement of fact. Of course, in the case of atheism, atheists are arguing from negative evidence, which is much harder than simply making the assertion.


Circular reasoning: Using the premise itself, or something that follows from the premise, in order to prove the premise. "I know God exists because the Bible says so and the Bible is the word of God." This argument is circular; in fact, nothing in the Bible can be said to "prove" the existence of God.


Red herring: Changing the subject. Bringing up irrelevant information instead of addressing the relevant points. "The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because 18 year olds are old enough to die for…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    read The New Testament (the only book he was allowed). However, it was not until…

    • 2517 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the novel, two men by the names Mikhail Berlioz and Ivan Nikolayevich (whose pen name was Bezdomny) have a conversation about Jesus Christ. Berlioz attempts to prove that a man such as “Jesus, as an individual, had never existed on earth at all and that all the stories about him were mere fabrications, myths of the standard kind.” [Bulgakov, 5] As the men continue their conversation, Woland, who appears as a mere foreigner joins the conversation. He tells the men that he met Pontius Pilate, and the two believe Woland to be crazy. Without knowing about Woland’s true identity, Berlioz denies the existence of God or Satan, and explains that a large portion of his population is in fact atheist. Woland predicts Berlioz’s death at the end of the conversation, and he continues on, wreaking havoc amongst many other people.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fathers and Sons: Nihilism

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Turgenov's Fathers and Sons has several characters who hold strong views of the world. Pavel believes that Russia needs structure from such things as institution, religion, and class hierarchy. Madame Odintsov views the world as simple so long as she keeps it systematic and free from interference. This essay will focus on perhaps the most interesting and complex character in Fathers and Sons: Bazarov. Vladimir Nabakov writes that "Turgenov takes his creature [B] out of a self-imposed pattern and places him in the the normal world of chance." By examining Bazarov this essay will make this statement more clear to the reader. Using nihilism as a starting point we shall look at Bazarov's views and interpretations of science, government and institution. Next we will turn to the issue relationships. Finally we examine Bazarov's death and the stunning truths it reveals. These issues combined with the theme of nihilism will prove that chance, or fate is a strong force which cannot easily be negated.<br><br>Nihilism as a concept is used throughout Fathers and Sons. To gain a better understanding of the ideas behind this term let's look at what Bazarov says on the subject. "We base our conduct on what we recognize as useful... the most useful thing we can do is to repudiate - and so we repudiate" (123). The base concept of nihilism is to deny or negate, and as we learn later in the same paragraph, to negate everything. With this 'destruction' of everything from science to art there is no building for nihilists, as Bazarov says "That is not our affair" (126). Nihilists view the current structure of society as concerned with such trivialties as 'art' and 'parliamentism' while ignoring real life issues such as food, freedom, and equally. Nihilists are aware of these social woes and hence mentally deny to recognize any of the present authority or institutions which only serve to perpetuate a myth. Bazarov agrees with the statement that nihilism "confine[s] [oneself] to abuse"…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    These can take the form of allusions to the holy books of one of the world’s religions, or the central figures of the religion, or to the religion’s teachings. In Crime and Punishment Dostoevsky has several of his characters, especially the female characters Dunya and Sonia make allusions to Christianity, and specifically to Christ’s suffering on the cross. In some forms of Christianity, it is taught that the great suffering the Christ endured while on the cross purified him of his sins; in other words, since Christ was part man, he was tainted by the same original sin that all humans are. It was through his suffering on the cross that Christ was purified of the original sin within himself. However, this suffering also redeems all of humanity. Because Christ suffered on the cross, all of humanity has the chance to be forgiven of the original sin, and then let into heaven. This is what Christians mean when they say Christ suffered and died for your sins. Both Sonia and Dunya take Christianity very seriously, and believe in its teachings. This is why they urge Raskolnikov to turn himself in and accept his punishment (the other word in the novel’s title) because only by suffering from his punishment does Raskolnikov have any chance of being saved. At first, Raskolnikov holds out, and says “they say it is necessary for me to suffer! What’s the object of these senseless sufferings”…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For one to make an association between God and the title character's name is completely logical. In fact, in producing the completely obvious allusion, Beckett beckons the interpreter to follow a path of religious symbolism. Throughout the play, references to Christianity are so often mentioned that one can scarcely identify a religious undercurrent; the presence of religion is not really below the surface. In the opening moments of the play, Vladimir asks "Hope deferred make something sick, who said that?" (8A). The real quotation, "Hope deferred maketh the heart sick," comes from Proverbs 13:12 of the Bible. Shortly after, Vladimir asks if Estragon has ever read the Bible and continues on a discussion of the…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays