Preview

Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology
Philip Zimbardo and His Contributions to Psychology
Fall 2013

In today’s fast paced society many of us have a tough time dealing and coping with our problems. This is when psychologists come into play. Psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. It deals with the mind and how we process mental and emotional things. Philip Zimbardo’s thoughts on psychology are, “I have been primarily interested in how and why ordinary people do unusual things, things that seem alien to their natures. Why do good people sometimes act evil? Why do smart people sometimes do dumb or irrational things?” And this is exactly what he tested in his Stanford Prison experiment.
Philip Zimbardo was born on March 23 in 1933 in New York City. Being raised in the South Bronx, he was the first person to attend college in his family. After enrolling in Brooklyn College, that’s where he earned his bachelors degree in 1954. (Fails) He then received his Masters from Yale University in 1955 and his Ph.D in 1958, which are both in psychology. For a short time he taught at Yale in 1958, and then went to New York University and Columbia University. He has been a professor at Stanford University since 1968. (Williams, 1998)
His research has covered so many ideas and areas of psychology. It has involved role playing, laboratory experiments, field studies, simulations and studies that demonstrate psychology phenomena. (Fails) All of his research has been mainly about how good people could turn evil, intelligent people end up doing dumb things, normal people do unexpected things and how the power of certain social situations can really change people’s personalities whether they are a man or a woman. Zimbardo has won more than twenty-four awards throughout his life. He has also served on twenty boards and consultations, is the author of more than twenty psychology textbooks, has written over one hundred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo’s mock prison experiment yielded the conclusion that individual behavior is largely under the control of social forces and environmental contingencies rather than personality traits, character, and will power. His findings were shown through the change in the pretend prison guards’ behavior over a matter of days. Their total demeanor was transformed and they became the role they were playing, with tyrannical and abusive actions towards the prisoners. The prison guards’ power went to their heads and corrupted them, much like what happened in the case of ordinary soldiers torturing prisoners. Like the prison guards, the soldiers were ordinary until they were put into a role of power. The environment of the prison with no structure or set rules changed the soldiers’ demeanors and caused them to throw their morals aside for limitless power over other human…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the field of psychology, experiments are an essential part of the study. Guidelines have been fenced around the experiments to protect the subjects being tested. Unethical experiments had to take place in order for these guidelines to be placed. In 1971, Psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment that changed the future of psychology and how it is practiced today, The Stanford Experiment. According to Kendra Cherry, author of an article The Stanford Experiment, researchers asked how subjects would react when placed in a prison environment.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. What particular personal challenges or characteristics, or conditions in the society and the profession of psychology had the greatest impact upon your development as a psychologist?…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In August of 1971, a group of researchers, headed by Dr. Philip Zimbardo, at Stanford University, set out to learn just how prison affects a person psychologically. The results of this experiment were shocking, to say the least, and led that team of researchers, and many others, to question just how bad the prison systems of America really are. The results of this experiment were far more devastating and shocking than anyone involved had imagined.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This was so true, once all the documents and finding were brought together on this study. The researchers did not expect the study to go the way it did nor did Zimbardo expect the outcome. Zimbardo was affected throughout this study, even though he was trying not to get involved, he was drawn in and viewing things differently. This study was also criticized by many people for their believing that this study was unethical, and that it had violated ethical codes. Other critics stated that the lack of generalizable and natural authority factors, made this study untrue as well. If this study would have been done in today’s times, it would be shut down before it even started. There have not been any other studies of its kind due to the outcome of this…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The principal states that Psychologists should exercise judgment to ensure that their biases or competence does not result in unjust practices. Relative to the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo was very involved in the experiment, more than a researcher should. He gave himself the role of Superintendent which made him very involved in the experiment to the extent which he could no longer make just decisions. A clear indication of this is when Christina Maslach visited Zimbardo--it was not until she questioned the nature of the experiment that he acknowledge the severity of the situation. His involvement as “Prison Superintendent” clouded his reasonable judgment. As a result, he allowed for the experiment to escalate, all of which was unjust.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The breadth and diversity of psychology can be seen by looking as some of its best known thinkers. While each theorist may have been part of an overriding school of thought, each brought a unique and individual voice and perspective to the field of psychology. A study that appeared in the July 2002 issue of the “Review of General Psychology” created a ranking of the 99 most influential psychologists. The rankings were mostly based on three factors: the frequency of journal citations, introductory textbook citations, and the survey responses of 1,725 members of the American Psychological Association. (About.com, 2015)…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this experiment, Professor Zimbardo and his subordinates chose the twenty-four of the most psychologically stable and healthy candidates from over seventy-five undergraduates. The randomly assigned prisoners were then arrested at their homes and processed with the help of local police, getting their mug shots taken, fingerprinted, and issued prison uniforms before being confined to a cell in a Stanford University basement. Those who were assigned prison guard duty were issued guard uniforms and instructed in how to treat the “prisoners”. The “guards” were also issued the wooden police batons as authority symbols and visible threats of physical injury to prisoners, and also wore mirrored sunglasses to prevent prisoner eye contact and add to the depersonalization of the mock prison. The second day of the experiment, the “prisoners” rioted, prompting the prison “guards” to break up the riot by attacking the prisoners with fire extinguishers without the supervision of the research staff. After thirty-six hours, “Prisoner 8612” went into a hysterical rage, and was only released after his suffering was apparent to the researchers. His release started a false rumor of a “prison break”, and the guards dismantled the prison to build in a more “secure” location. People would believe the experiment would be ended at that point, especially since the subjects involved were Stanford undergraduates under the supervision of a respectable university professor. They do not understand that when human beings become too involved in their roles or their society, they become what they and everyone else are acting as, creating a new identity to fit in, rather than fight the system to make it…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apa Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Instance, The Stanford Prison Experiment carry out by Haney, Banks & Zimbardo is known for its significant study but also its violation of ethics in psychology (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). The concept of this experiment was to determine the role of conformity in an experiment act to establish the correlation between prison guards and prisoners in the prison system(Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). Although, its success, the experiment received immense condemnation due to the ethical violations that occurred during the experiment. Philip Zimbardo failed to stop the experiment as soon as it was getting out of hand. Zimbardo and his colleagues were determining to see how far the experiment could go they failed to see the damage it was doing to their…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rutherford, A. (2004, Autumn). Where history, philosophy, and psychology meet: An interview with Wayne Viney. Teaching of Psychology, 31(4), 289-295.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo is one who has adapted the branch of social psychology. His biggest contribution is his 1971 Stanford prison experiment which was created to research the effects situational forces have on human demeanor (verywell). This was Philip’s main area of focus in his career. “In the study, 24 male university students were randomly assigned to act as ‘prisoners’ or ‘guards’ in a mock prison” (famous). The experiment didn’t last for more than a week due to the drastic change in behavior shown by all the students.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays