Define free will, truth, knowledge, and opinion. Explain how we use them to form thoughts. What role does each play in critically assessing situations?…
Truth. The person’s belief that p needs to be true. If it is incorrect instead, then — no matter what else is good or useful about it — it is not knowledge. It would only be something else, something lesser. Admittedly, even when a belief is mistaken it can feel to the believer as if it is true. But in that circumstance the feeling would be mistaken; and so the belief would not be knowledge, no matter how much it might feel to the believer like knowledge.…
Consider this. Sadie walks into the store intending to buy M&Ms. Instead she chooses against it because she would rather have Skittles. So she checks out and merrily goes on her way with her Skittles. Is this free will? What if she had wanted to buy marijuana, but that was not there because it is illegal? Is that still free will? Or is someone or something controlling the choices she makes? Or how about this case. Joe gets arrested for stealing. He goes to jail without having the option to say no. Is this free will? Well, it was free will when Joe was stealing. Joe chose to steal, therefore he received the punishment, which was made clear in laws for that county. Yes, that is free will. But, do we really have free will, or are we given guidelines that make us believe we have free will but in reality are controlled by someone in authority?…
knowledge: The awareness and understanding of a set of information and ways that information can be made useful to support a specific task or reach a decision.…
1. Knowledge-the sum of what is known. knowledge is facts, awareness or familiarity gained by doing the knowledge. Who is knowledge? It symbolizes the black man. When can you knowledge? Anytime. Where? Everywhere. How is knowledge gained? Through study, learning, listening, trial and error, observing, reflection…
I also believe that reality is basically changing – kind of like the old adage that says “you can never step in the same river twice” a river is still a river but it is never ever the same river as it was a week ago. I apply this to the concept of truth.…
According to merriam-webster.com truth is defined as, “The property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality”. This seems simple enough, but merriam-webster also gives a different definition, “a true or accepted statement or idea.” Truth is thought of something as unchanging or “set in stone”, but what do they mean when they say “accepted statement or idea”? This gives the idea that truth is pliable, not just based on facts but also on opinions, does this make truth irrelevant? As everyone know truth cannot be based on a personal opinion, but it takes an opinion to accept something. The question of truth has been a philosophical question for ages. The world is full of changes, it really is run by things changing, all advances and discoveries are found because something has changed. A good example of a truth changing is the past theory about the world being flat. For thousands of years is was held that the globe was flat this was an irrefutable truth. But as technology and science began to change this was proven otherwise, all it took was a Aristotle to propose one simple theory to debunk one of the highest held truths. This calls into the question of truth all together, because who is to say there won’t be another debunking of this sorts. How can truth exist if has been proven over and over again to be false. This makes Merriam-Webster’s second definition more accurate, truth is almost something based on culture and society. It is something that must be accepted, or popular opinion. It is impossible to contain all the arguments about truth in this essay, but this definition is most suitable to the current day and age. With a world that is never really sure about the truth or refuses to accept it, the definition of truth must adapt so it won’t become totally…
What is knowledge? What is truth? How can we really know for sure if one judgment holds more truth than another? My theory of knowledge is information passed on from one person to the next. Before I am able to answer the above questions I have asked, the question of this idea that is true knowledge must be defined first. Knowledge can be any new piece of information that I come across daily. The coin phrase “you learn something new everyday” came from the most modest definition of knowledge that I know. So simple it does sound that knowledge is information. A person can have more knowledge than the next and that is how knowledge is spread around. It is up to me to decide if what I hear is truly knowledge. It is up to my on belief or judgment of what is said to me. The claim that knowledge is true judgment is not even true itself. It is impossible to know all truths and impossible to trust that everything I hear is true even if I judge it that way.…
epistemology. To come to a conclusion about if knowledge can be defined or not we need to look at theories of knowledge and the different views philosophers who have studied epistemology have. To define knowledge one must find a definition that states, what is necessary for knowledge as well as sufficient and cannot be challenged by counter examples. So what can one say knowledge is? The classic definition for knowledge is that a statement must be justified, true and believed at this point knowledge was defined as having a justified true belief, this is the is known as the tripartite definition for knowledge (Prosser, 2007). Therefore the classic definition of knowledge states that to have knowledge it is necessary that we have a justified true belief (Y only if X). Some philosophers claim that these three conditions however are not sufficient (Whenever X obtains, you are guaranteed Y) to define knowledge.…
Furthermore, Knowledge according to my definition is the means by which "facts" can be gathered to reinforce, or refute, different aspects of the information contained within our belief system. Often, it is asserted that something is "true" or "factual", but neither of these are actually relevant since the only consequence of knowledge that we…
Knowledge can be defined as something which is achieved through experience. Knowledge can be segregated into different areas like art, mathematics, human sciences, etc. All areas of knowledge are based on knowledge claims. Every area of knowledge is different from the other. Some of them are discovered while some are invented.…
Free will is the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate, the ability to act at one’s own discretion, freedom of choice, liberty…
Zero Knowledge Authentication Scheme based on Discrete Log Vineeth Pillai Department of Computer Science, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA vipillai@hawk.iit.edu, CWID: A20260824 April 26, 2012 Abstract: This paper details a variant of the parallel version of zero knowledge proof of identity which tries to optimize the space usage and number of iteration by not sacrificing the soundness factor. This protocol could a suitable candidate for smart card based authentication schemes where the smart card is usually inferior to the authentication unit in terms of processing power, storage capacity and communication infrastructure.…
Positivism includes application of natural science methods to social science research; phenomenalism; deductivism; inductivism; objective, value-free researcher; distinction between scientific and normative statements.…
knowledge and truth – with what and how we know and the limits of human…