Piaget Vs Vygotsky Compare And Contrast

In this paper, I will be discussing the pros and cons between the two theories by Jean Piaget, and by Lev Vygotsky. Both Piaget and Vygotsky provided vastly significant theories which had power on the way offspring are cultivated. Yet, as with every theory and study, there are pro’s and con’s to be emphasized. I will first assess Jean Piaget’s theory, trailed by Lev Vygotsky. I will then relate the two with each other, viewing the main similarities and differences among the two.
Piaget’s theory is based on several fixed, distinct stages. When a youngster obtains all, they need to transfer onto the next stage, the human brain isn’t like a light switch, so a ‘switch’ doesn’t just flick where they transfer into another stage. Cognitive development is much more
When looking at Vygotsky’s theory, he sees learning as a social setting, while Piaget sees it as a solitary setting. Development that is driven by Vygotsky’s theory is based off of input from others as well as MKO’s, while Piaget’s theory sees it been driven by conflict during stages. Vygotsky sees the context of development as being different dependent on social and cultural context. Piaget sees the context of development as being universal and stages are the same regardless of situation. Vygotsky sees knowledge being assembled when offspring work together, Piaget believes children get information through their personal investigations. Piaget also believes in the stages, where Vygotsky does not. Piaget sees the link as development precedes learning, while Vygotsky sees learning heads development. Languages drives thought, Vygotsky believe while Piaget believed thoughts drives language. Both theories are focused on the youngster learning as they cultivate. But without the complete proof, we have no way for certain of saying who’s accurate and who’s