Preview

Plato and Aristotle Ethical Views

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Aristotle Ethical Views
The views of ethics vary greatly when talking about Plato and Aristotle. Aristotle has his own views even though such an influential man like Plato taught him. Plato and Aristotle try to deliver this universal system of ethical principals that will determine good and bad. Through doing so they realizes their differences in what they believe. Plato and Aristotle can both agree that good is happiness and in order to continue the good you must exercise self-fulfillment through integrity. Plato believes virtue comes from the soul and individuals will strive to acquire excellence in order to attain happiness. Aristotle thinks virtue is the potential excellence the individual already has in his or her soul. Ancient Greeks have said that excellence and innate ability comes from the soul, which are god given abilities. Something which we are born with which goes back to saying that happiness, being ethical and virtuous is something that we are born with. As Aristotle says it comes from the outside, which gives us the potential to be ethical and virtuous people. But in order to enjoy life you must find your soul and it will give you the innate potential. The idea of choice is something Aristotle really focuses on rather then Plato. Aristotle states with right choices you will get freedom and freedom is gained through self-determination. Aristotle says choice is something you do freely and whatever choices you make will follow you in the future. Thus, making you responsible for all the actions you take during life. Virtues are thought to be voluntary because each person has the power to choose the decisions they make whether they are just or unjust. Aristotle claims that in order to be a good person you can’t just do one just act you have to live a life of just acts. On the other hand Plato thinks if you do just acts sometimes they make you a just person. In Book III Aristotle questions voluntary actions because people are still in control of themselves and no matter

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle summarizes how ethics can be used to determine the best way for an individual to achieve happiness. After reading the text, there were a couple of themes that stood out the most to me. Happiness is a choice and with this happiness, friends are needed most of all.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    not teaching them better. While one might have been raised to know the difference between the right and wrong, who the person begins to associate himself with could change his/ her moral character. In The Nicomachean Ethics without virtues one can not be happy so a life lived making morally wrong decisions is a life that will not see happiness according to Aristotle. An example that best proves Aristotle’s thinking is one of a man losing his dog at a local park. The man searches all over for his dog, but his dog is nowhere to be seen. After hours of searching the man returns home. The dog did in fact run away, but a young mom and her two daughters stopped the dog before it can go any further. Attempting to find who the owner of the dog is,…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Moral Beliefs

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My moral beliefs also correspond to the philosophy that is taught by Aristotle. In my opinion, happiness comes from within ourselves, not from our surroundings. I think this is a very important part of Aristotle’s teaching. I believe that in order to accept others and enjoy life, we must first learn to accept ourselves and be proud of who we are. If we are constantly ashamed with who we are, then we are not free to live a happy life. I think this is the main idea in Aristotle’s teaching. He believed that in order for us to be happy we must build our own character by choosing to live virtuously.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle accepts the individual choices and experiences of people and was more concerned with virtue ethics. He doesn't have an idea of free will. Along with Socrates, Aristotle believes that someone may know what the best outcome is and still do wrong, but draws the line between happiness and moral virtue. This includes depression and unhappiness. The world has moral meaning. He explains that moral virtue does not mean the end of life. His theory is that happiness is the end of life, which comes together with reason. Virtue is a state of personality that has to do with someone’s choice.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle lived during the B.C. era and established the concept of teleological ethics. This means that ethics has a purpose or a reason. He stressed the concept of doctrine of the mean-- maintaining balance in one's actions. Additionally, he theorized the idea of developing virtuous habits to build good character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how reaching one's potential by living well and acting well will ultimately lead to happiness. Moreover, he stated one should base one's actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire.…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C. in Athens, Greece, it focuses primarily on personal character and the development of certain virtuous character traits. To act well in various circumstances by doing the right thing is the center focus of a person’s character traits as in their self-control, courage, wisdom, honesty and respect that makes the person what they are over time. This life of a virtuously ethical person emphasizes achieving human excellence by always doing the right thing, the mere meaning of virtue from both the Latin and Greek culture means “excellence”, to be a model citizen and is founded on the assumption that the purpose of life was to achieve happiness and fulfillment. Aristotle though, has the most prolific virtue ethics theory, he held that understanding the meaning of a virtue was necessary but not sufficient to make one virtuous and that there are many specific virtues: intellectual, and moral, whereas moral virtues are those we would need in order to conduct affairs in daily life such as self-control, courage, gentleness and wittiness. Intellectual virtue reflects what is unique and important about human nature, human reasoning and rationality, calmness, wisdom and knowledge to name a few. Virtue ethics is the embodiment of being all you can be by making the most of our talents and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two common compare and contrast scenarios is Aristotle versus Christianity. The views of Aristotle’s ethics are in some way a lot different but also if you look deep enough you can find similar views that mimic Christianity. The definition of ethics is one word, morality. Determining whether what you’re doing is either right or wrong. Most of the time, different people will answer differently if the action is considered morally right or morally wrong. Aristotle believes in eudemonia, a Greek word for fulfillment or spiritual happiness. In order to live a good life, you have to develop good habits and according to him become an ‘ideal gentleman”. The three character types are virtuous, continent/enduring, incontinent/soft, and vicious/indulgent. The one to become an ideal gentleman is obviously virtuous because it is to be morally good or the golden mean. Vicious would be the worst to be. Christianity is a little different it is more focused on faith, hope and love or the three theological virtues of faith.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this essay, with all the information I have gathered from the readings and lectures, I will be discussing an essential concept of Aristotle’s virtue ethics; his “doctrine of the mean”. I will provide a detailed explanation of Aristotle’s mean, how it is meant to be applied when making decisions, provide arguments from various sources that agree with the main concept of the “doctrine of the mean” and with all of the information gathered, I will prove that this doctrine is extremely useful to people when it comes to making moral decisions in life.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, book VIII and IX talk about the different types of friendships and what they mean to the person. The articles I’ve selected provide a better explanation on what Aristotle meant by giving examples and up to date explanations. The other sources help provide a better understanding on what dual relationships is for a social worker and the consequences attached to those actions. The last two sources help understand what a social worker needs to become a certified worker, and the ethical codes they need to follow daily.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One noticeable omission in the otherwise ever flourishing literature on Plato's Crito (and one might say on the early Platonic dialogues in general) is the recognition that Plato is presenting a problem from a virtue ethical angle. This is no doubt due to the fact that Aristotle, rather than Plato is regarded as the originator of Virtue Ethics as a branch of philosophy.1 Plato's own contribution to the discipline is more…

    • 5091 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with this theory. For Socrates, the key to a virtuous life was knowledge of the GOOD. He believed, if one knew the Good one would choose it. One always chooses the best of the options available. The question is what is the Good? He would say, evil is the result of ignorance, and that Wrong doing is involuntary. Evil doers must be educated, instructed as to what truly is the GOOD and then they will choose it. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it. We always choose what we think is the best or good for us. So, if someone chooses to do what we think is wrong, then that person made a mistake and must be educated to see the error. They mistook evil for the GOOD. But, I believe that there are many people that do commit evil doings, while truly knowing that they are in fact evil. Again, Socrates would indeed argue that these poor souls were somehow shown that these ways were the right ways or the “good” ways. I would love to believe that there is no evil in the world. But, I believe that there is evil within all of us, but it only comes out if we allow it.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As explained in the previous texts Aristotle based his views off of how a person ought to live. There is a generic rule of what a human being should find virtuous but also people can have different beliefs on virtues specifically for them. Utilitarianism is act orientated rather than agent orientated. So in this view it describes actions that will get us what we want. Virtue ethics is agent orientated where actions are devised by what we desire while using reason. This reasoning is the action any “good” person would do. Utilitarianism believes in the same consequence for each situation. This outcome is happiness. Virtue ethics considers what the right course of action is in different situations. So what is noticed is utilitarianism depends…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics book one, he starts of describing “good”. He believes that every activity humans do is to achieve a good. The satisfactory goals we have are to achieve a greater good. And our highest good is classified as the supreme good. Politics is a form of this good. But it cannot be classified as the supreme good because what is good for one may not be good for another.…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi 160

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Aristotle, virtue are those characteristics that allows an individual to live well. There are two kinds of virtues, the moral virtues and the intellectual virtues. Aristotle clarifies that moral virtues are different than intellectual virtues, because in order to have moral virtues one must live to learn them. On the other hand intellectual virtues are taught directly from someone else. For instance, one must practice how to play an instrument in order to be good at playing it. We can not teach an individual to be good at playing an instrument without practice. Aristotle agrees that “moral virtues, then, are engendered in us neither by nor contrary to nature; we are constituted by nature receive them, but their full development in us is due to habit (Rachels and Rachels, 2012).” Moral virtues must be practiced daily, it is not a one day thing. By practice, one can be a very virtuous human being.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    rulers, army, and workers. Now the base line is the workers, and they do not…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics