Preview

Plato Defends Rationalism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato Defends Rationalism
Plato Defends Rationalism Plato was a highly educated Athenian Philosopher. He lived from 428-348 B.C. Plato spent the early portion of his life as a disciple to Socrates, which undoubtedly helped shape his philosophical theories. One topic that he explored was epistemology. Epistemology is the area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge, and that considers various theories of knowledge (Lawhead 52). Plato had extremely distinct rationalistic viewpoints. Rationalism is the claim that reason, or intellect, is the primary source of our fundamental knowledge about reality (55). By examining Plato’s philosophical position on the three basic epistemological questions, as well as analyzing his ability to justify the three anchor points of rationalism, it is clear to see that Plato was successful in defending rationalism. There are three basic questions that are the basis for determining the difference between each of the epistemological viewpoints. The first of these is: Is knowledge possible? In order to understand exactly what is being asked here, it is important to consider the agreed definition of knowledge as being a “true justified belief” (53). Plato believed that yes, it is possible to have knowledge. He claimed that as long as one has the ability to recognize something as false, they are capable of having knowledge. The second question is: Does reason provide us with knowledge of the world independently of experience? Plato would also answer yes to this question as well. Many objected to this, believing that knowledge was a result of sense experience rather than reason. Plato examined this theory (empiricism); he argued that, because the physical world is subject to change, there can be no real truth in knowledge that is based solely on one’s senses. He then used the examples Justice, Goodness, and Equality to justify his argument that there are some things that we cannot come to know through experience alone, thus


Cited: Lawhead, William F. The Philosophical Journey: An Interactive Approach. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 52-81. Print

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato's understanding of knowledge is justified true belief. After rejecting 2 accounts of knowledge (knowledge as perception & knowledge as true belief) , defined as KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF. (PG. 20)…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The young man who would eventually be called Plato, by his gymnasium classmates due to his muscular build, started off as a student of the gadfly of Athens, Socrates. Plato was deeply devoted to his master Socrates, even attending the event of his death, drinking the poison hemlock After his master’s death, Plato went on to build upon his masters teaching to the point, where both philosopher’s teaching is…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most influential minds in western philosophy is of Plato. Plato lived from 422-347 B.C, was born into an aristocratic family in the city of Athens. He was a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle. Plato followed the basic ideas of Socrates, in which no laws are to be broken despite their relevance. He makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Plato is considered a very essential figure in the contribution of philosophy and an essential figure to western tradition. He was the prime founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning within the Western World. Plato has a range of teachings that have been used to instruct a wide spread of subjects. Some…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge is generally thought to require justified true belief, even if justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge, as Edmund Gettier famously argued. In the Meno, Plato demonstrates that true opinion is not equal to knowledge. However, Gettier holds a different opinion that justified opinion is not equal to knowledge, but it is necessary to knowledge. I support the Plato’s opinion that true opinion is not equal to knowledge, and that justified opinion is not necessary to having knowledge of something.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato, a philosopher of the 17th century, contended that "Opinion at its best is a matter of probability, and knowledge at its least is entirely sure (Lamprecht, 1955, p. 43)" For Plato, knowledge starts with ones senses, nothing can be thought without first being sensed. He then contended that we live in an inferior world of particulars parallel to a world where all objects are perfect, where reality stems forms ideas or ideals. For Plato's culture this was particularly important because they needed a way to distinguish between justice as it was practiced by their government, and the ideal justice that could be thought and hoped for (Rogers & Baird 1981, p. 3). In Plato's search to clarify this problem he used what is now commonly referred to as Rationalism. Rationalism can be defined as "the epistemological theory that significant knowledge of the world can best be achieved by a prior means." Or in simplified terms, rationalism is when we come to a conclusion by deduction from abstract ideas (Rogers & Baird 1981, p. 3).…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Possible? What is eternal? What can we know? These are all questions people ask themselves when they are studying skepticism. But a lot of people do not even understand what skepticism means.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato, (1989). Plato’s Theory of Knowledge.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proof for God's Existence

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Miller, ED.L. 2006, Questions that Matter: An Invitation to Philosophy, third shorter Ed., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Colorado.…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Defense of Socrates” is a detailed account of Socrates being tried before the Athenian court. The “Defense” is written in first person, though it is actually written by Plato, who is an outside observer to the trial. According to Plato, there is a manifold of reasons as to why Socrates was on trial. The Athenians believed Socrates as guilty of blasphemy, investigating concepts that failed to acknowledge the presence of gods, as well as, corrupting the youth.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment has been a part of our justice system since the beginning. For many years the controversy of the death penalty has created social issues that question the validity and fairness based on concerns of moral and human rights. Even though many other nations use this form of justice, the fact that the United States views itself as a leader of human rights brings question to whether we are practicing what we preach. Nevertheless, the majority of US citizens are in support of the death penalty but does that make it rational? In the following paragraphs I will discuss my opinions on capital punishment and talk about issues concerning the death penalty as a deterrent to crime, should it be abolished and whether should youths convicted of violent crimes receive the death penalty. I will also explain how the irony of capital punishment makes it an issue of ethics having that both sides of this issue have valid positions that will keep the idea that as long as there is crime, capital punishment is here to stay whether we like it or not.…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Divided Line

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One such argument for Plato was the argument for knowledge as recollection, as stated in the Phaedo: “[…] recollection is most commonly a process of recovering that which has already been forgotten through time and inattention. ”1 Drawing from this argument, Plato suggests that anything which is known of the immaterial world of forms must have been learned through recollection. In A History of Philosophy, Frederick Copleston summarizes Plato in stating, “We discover [forms]: they are not simply invented by us. ”2…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates And Theaetetus

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Theaetetus is a dialogue, written by Plato, which is mainly concerned with the nature of knowledge. Socrates and Theaetetus discuss three different types of knowledge: knowledge as perception, knowledge as true judgment, and knowledge as true judgment with an account. The three definitions given by each were unacceptable for Socrates and a final definition is not given. In the end, Socrates quickly left the conversation to attend court for a charge pressed against him. This dialogue is known for its leading epistemology, which is one of Plato’s principal philosophical concentrations and is believed to have been written around 369 BC.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Aristotle Dialogue

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato’s views on knowledge were interesting to me. Plato believed that knowledge about reality comes from within the soul through a form of recollection rather than from without through being (Moore & Bruder, 2011). Plato also believed that the soul was immortal. Thus the soul, since is immortal and has been born many times, and has seen all things both here and in the other world, has learned everything that is (Moore & Bruder, 2011). He believed that a man would not seek what he already knows. He knows it so there is no need to inquire (Moore & Bruder, 2011). Plato believed that when we are faced with seemingly new things, it does not take us long to learn them because we have learned them in another life. When we are presented with issues, our recollection sets in and everything comes back to our memory.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was believed to have been a dualist, he believed in two worlds: The World of Appearances and The World of Forms. In his opinion, the world we currently live in is what he would have called the World of Appearances. Everything we sense, feel, touch, smell, etc is 'real'. Yet Plato thought that these sense deceived us. He said as everything in the world is in a state of flux/change, it is an unreliable source of what is considered 'real'. Plato believed a lot of what we see is based on opinion, he saw that opinion was also subject to change and thus is an unreliable source of true knowledge.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deductive Argument

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay I will be arguing against Plato’s theory of knowledge given in the Republic’s divided line. I will distinguish the differences and similarities in the epistemological concepts of Plato and Aristotle intending to explain how one comes to have knowledge and the process through which it’s obtained. As support, I will explain Plato’s theory of forms and Aristotle’s theory of essence because they are a direct correlation to their view of knowledge through reality.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays