Preview

Plato’s 1st Argument for the Immortality of the Soul from Opposites and Theory of Reincarnation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato’s 1st Argument for the Immortality of the Soul from Opposites and Theory of Reincarnation
Plato’s 1st argument for the Immortality of the Soul from opposites and Theory of Reincarnation Plato’s Phaedo is a dialog between Phaedo, Cebes and Simmias where Socrates gives some arguments for the immortality of the soul. In this work, Phaedo tells us about Socrates’ final days, who has been convicted to death. Great philosopher does not have a fear of death because he believes that when a man dies, the soul still exists even if the body perishes. Trying to prove his arguments, Socrates presents two proofs – Doctrine of Opposites and second which is based on Theory of Recollections. In Phaedo he writes: “That soul, I say, herself invisible, departs to the invisible world – to the divine and immortal and rational…”. In this quote, Plato uses the first argument about Opposites of things. He implies that while the body dies and decomposes, the soul still lives. In other words, if the body must cease, the soul should be immortal because it is the body’s opposite. There are a lot of examples from Doctrine of Opposites which are given by Phaedo and Socrates. Moreover, according to Socrates’ definition – one opposite thing comes from another opposite as well. For instance, increasing and decreasing, cooling and heating, separation and combination, etc. Let’s take the example of being asleep and being awake. If you are not sleeping, then you are awake, or on the contrary – if you are not awake, then you are sleeping. These two actions could not exist at the same time because when you are sleeping it is impossible to be awakened. Indeed, sleep comes from being awake. Consequently, there must be first condition before the second – in order to become awakened firstly we should be sleeping. The same we know with life and death – when a man ceases to exist anymore, he dies. But if one comes from another, thus there should be opposite action – life after dying. His second argument is based on the Theory of Recollection. This theory suggests that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato suggests that the soul is distinct from the body. The soul is immortal whereas the body is mortal. At the end of life the soul is set free from the body. Plato writes that a human person is a soul ‘imprisoned’ in a body. For Plato the goal of the soul is the world of Forms, which can only be seen indirectly in the physical world.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, I will evaluate Socrates’ argument from Phaedo for why philosophers should desire death, perhaps only secondly to wisdom. I will argue that Socrates unfairly characterizes the truthfulness of the senses, and therefore projects a pessimistic view of the philosopher’s virtue during life. This pessimism towards life in conjunction with arguments for an afterlife that liberates reason, seems to suggest that Socrates believes philosophers should desire death: a happy prospect for condemned man, but perhaps a biased one.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After explaining who Crito was, I then went on and discuss Phaedo which is the death scene. Jacques Louis David based his painting on the death scene. It was the day for Socrates to drink the hemlock. He said that he would like to take a bath before he crosses the great divine. Crito ask Socrates if he would like to be buried and Socrates said that they can do whatever with his body. Socrates went on great lengths to say after he passed away, his soul will leave his body and it will live on eternally and that the body that is left behind will no longer be him. Socrates also told him that he should not be upset to see his body being buried or cremated. Socrates goes into the next room to speak to his family and give them his last farewell and…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments For Phaedo

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Phaedo, Socrates does not fear death because he believes that his soul is immortal and will be sent to heaven after his death. It is worth noticing here that he pre-assumes that the soul exists, so his central argument is not about whether the soul exists, but whether it is immortal. One of his arguments is that the soul is invincible, and invincible things can’t be destroyed, so the soul is immortal. I shall explain more fully this argument in the next paragraph. Then I shall offer my objection on his premise that invincible things can’t be destroyed, and thus how his argument of the immortality of the soul is invaid.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time there have been many different views of what afterlife is. Plato and Christianity are no different; between the two ideas there are many similarities and differences that can be distinguished. Plato believed in the idea of immortality and dualism. He believed that the soul was immortal both before and after death, and that the body was mortal and ceased to function after death. Plato believed that your soul has always existed and always will, and that your embodied life as a human is just a small part of your existence. Plato believed that the disembodied soul was the highest form of survival because the immaterial realm of the forms is the highest form of existence. In other words Plato suggests that your embodied existence is not nearly as ideal as your disembodied existence. The basis of Christianity is bodily resurrection. Like Plato’s theory Christianity also believes in the cessation of bodily functions after death, and also believes that the soul does exist for a time disembodied. However in Christianity the soul begins at birth and is not immortal, it dies with the body, and then is resurrected after an unknown period of time by God. Christianity suggests the theory that people follow the Christian Doctrine of Predestination. This is essentially the theory that humans cannot chose whether they will be saved to heaven and from hell. It is the idea that some humans are chosen by God as elect, and some humans are damned by God. In other words; a person can do nothing about their predestination. The idea of predestination is not contingent upon status, or moral character, it is only by the grace of God that a person may be saved. This idea has been controversial, but many well known Christians were known to believe in predestination. Many Christians also believe in the idea that humans have partial control over their afterlife. They believe that they can achieve salvation by through moral character, and belief. This is also a widely accepted…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    True wisdom which Plato calls the Form, is not physical as the body is. Since the body, with its appetitive and passionate characteristics, militates against the contemplation of the Form (which results in the attainment of the Philosopher’s quest – true wisdom) death, the liberation of the soul, becomes a rite of passage into the everlasting enjoyment of that true wisdom. So, if the philosophers are lovers of wisdom, and if the true wisdom is invisible as the soul and if death liberates or separates the body from the soul so that the soul now has unlimited access to true wisdom, then the philosopher ought to be cheerful in the face of death because he is about to gain the everlasting reward.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' Apology

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though this reading is old it still carries great value and importance because it shows that knowledge as Socrates argues is not ours but it belongs to God. Hence, Socrates’ work will continue even after his death “For the word which I will speak is not mine.” It reminds me of Jesus Christ, which story is similar to Socrates’. They both followed a divined forced rather than their own interests and hence both didn’t have a sign of this divine force until the very end. However, their end, death, might seem a negative end to others but the opposite was for both Socrates’ and Jesus’ point of view. Furthermore, their deaths didn’t stop the work they were doing and were accused of but it rather intensified it, making other to seek same path or belief.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the chapter "Do We Survive Death" by James Rachel’s quotes' perspectives about the presence of soul. Socrates insists that every person is made out of a physical body and a nonphysical soul. For a man…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Phaedrus, Plato’s most commonly employed myths are those in relation to the soul. Plato implies that he believed that the soul has no beginning and has no end- that it simply is. Every aspect of the soul is simply built onto the already established soul. Our souls define how we interpret new and old things and how we decide to live our lives. Our souls are composed of multiple different parts, all pertaining to past events. The different myths mentioned involving the soul help his audience to gain further access into his own…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phaedo By Plato

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In his work titled Phaedo, Plato portrays his master Socrates in his final day before execution. Many philosophers gather with him and a dialogue arises, by which Plato conveys one of the most fundamental theories unfolding the after life. During this conversation Socrates exposes his believe of the immortality of the soul, arguing that he indeed is eager to die, claiming that death just represents the separation of soul and body. According to him, philosophers prepare throughout their lives for this, given that by the soul alone, reason, and wisdom flourish. By presenting different ideas like the argument of opposites, the theories of recollection and forms, and the simplicity argument, Socrates manages to fully convince his visitors of his…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays