Preview

Socrates and the Afterlife

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates and the Afterlife
Socrates and the Afterlife
J Tarolli
November 14, 2012
Introduction to Philosophy
Brian Raftery

Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death. Socrates doesn’t fear death because of his philosophical life. He even states that “those that have duly purified themselves with philosophy live henceforth altogether without the body, in mansions fairer than these.” (Plato & Jowett, 1901, p. 444). His fear is tossed aside because he believes that a man that has positive and noble characteristics is ready die. He believes that his journey to the afterlife will be a short span and he will be reborn unto this world. Socrates that as long as a man has cast aside his pleasures as alien to the body and can cause pain is ready to go. Socrates had a very vivid imagination as to his views on death and the afterlife. He envisioned guided paths that one must follow to a point of entry to the rivers. He described these rivers with the ebb and flow of life. The final spot is Tartarus, the deepest point in the Earth. His theory was that each person travelled one of these rivers until they were ready to return to Earth in another form. The philosophical will dwell in the purer Earth in mansions. The incurable will are destined to Tartarus and never to come out. Those that are neither well nor ill will suffer a penalty and then be absolved. There are some that have committed crimes that are not unpardonable and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates who was he? “Socrates was a Greek philosopher. Socrates was born c. 470/469 B.C., in Athens”. (Wiki) In Phaedo, I understand that Socrates he has arguments that demonstrate that the soul is immortal. “If we live on after bodily death, there is no reason to fear it.” (Phaedo) However, these ideas are attributed to Socrates in Phaedo. Of course we have no way of knowing if he feared death or not. He appeared not to fear death but who knows. You hear people say all the time, "I have no fear of death"--I've even thought that to myself-- but there's no way they or myself can know that until the last few minutes of life. I think that virtually everyone will fear death at…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates believes that the “souls of the dead in the underworld” come from people who are living today and that the “living souls come back of those from the dead.”…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates faced a life ending death penalty, although having a well prepared opportunity to escape;…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time of his trial where Socrates was being sentenced to death, he made the argument that death is either good or neutral. Considering this, he first makes the point that it is foolish to fear what we do not understand. Furthermore, he goes on to make the claim that either death is a state of nonexistence, similar to a long slumber, or if there is a state of consciousness in death, as long as one is virtuous, he may be able to partake in philosophical debates and discourse with philosophers who have passed away before him. As a result, it is difficult not to view death as either neutral or good, when one takes Socrates’ view to heart.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates vs Gilgamesh

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joe Arce 19 Sept 2011 Socrates Vs. Gilgamesh Socrates’ view of death in the Phaedo, Crito, and Apology is complex. His argument tries to prove that philosophers, of all people, are in the best state to die or will be in the best state after life because of the life they lead. Socrates’ views are sharply contrasted in The Epic of Gilgamesh. In fact, he would probably say that Gilgamesh had not lived the proper kind of life and his views of life, and death would lead to an unsettled existence in the afterlife. Socrates’ view of death, from his opinions on the act of dying, the state of the soul after death, and the fear of death, differs from that of The Epic of Gilgamesh to the extent that Socrates would refute every belief about death presented in The Epic of Gilgamesh. Socrates believes the act of dying to be a separation of the soul from the body. The soul is that which attains knowledge, and the body is that which experiences senses and emotions. In Gilgamesh there is no distinction between the body and soul. In the Phaedo, before Socrates drinks the poison Crito questions him as to how he would like to be buried to which Socrates replies, “I do not convince Crito that I am this Socrates talking to you here and ordering all I say, but he thinks that I am the thing which he will soon be looking at as a corpse” (Plato 153). By this Socrates means that after death what is left is merely the body and that the self is in the soul, which is no longer part of the body. Gilgamesh does not see things this way. After the death of Enkidu he tells the Man-Scorpion, “I have wept for him day and night, I would not give up his body for burial, I thought my friend would come back because of my weeping” (Gilgamesh 98). Gilgamesh has the view that the body still encompasses what is the self. Socrates would obviously say that it is nonsense to cling to the body of the dead as if it were the person because the soul has already departed. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, death is a…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowadays, many died because of accident, by sickness, and by drowning. Others by old age, murder, suicide, starvation, overeating, and some died while still in the womb. Some died with open minds in surrendering their lives with peace of hearts. But many people are wondering, what really happens when a human dies, and what the purpose of death is. Does it need some preparation, and is there something to fear of death? Why need to die, is there something new after death?…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phaedo Summary

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through out his whole testimony, Socrates states questions to his disciples already knowing the answers, but he wants to hear Simmias agree to all of them. "Do we believe that there is such a thing as death," states by Socrates. When Simmias agrees this he brings out all his support. Socrates believes "Death" is the separation of the body and soul. The soul is the biggest part of the death. The soul goes on living and doesn't have to deal with any of the bad commodities of the body attached. You are only dead when this separation has been completed. Therefore death is when the body exists in herself, and is released from the soul.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the only way in which a person can truly achieve true wisdom. Socrates understood this and tried to explain it to others. Socrates makes a strong argument for the immortality of the soul and the need for separation between the soul and body. I believe that in order to achieve true wisdom and philosophical knowledge one must use one�s soul and not one�s senses. It is necessary to separate the soul form the body in order to avoid being mislead by the senses. The only true way in order to achieve this separation is through death. I believe that the soul is immortal and in death transcends the body and achieves true wisdom. Socrates poses very strong arguments for these ideas and through his arguments convinced and inspired many great minds.Plato was perhaps one of the most intriguing minds of his time. His works influenced many of today�s great minds. One of his greatest works was his Five Dialogues. The Five Dialogues include: Euthyphro; Apology; Crito; Meno; and Phaedo. Of the five books, Phaedo is arguable the most captivating. Phaedo is an account of the ideas of the great philosopher, Socrates. In Phaedo, Socrates discusses many controversial ideas such as philosophical method, death, the true philosopher, and many other ideas as well. Socrates also discusses the nature of the soul in Phaedo. The nature of the soul is one of the main points of Plato�s dialogues. It is also important to understand the soul�s role in acquiring…

    • 5344 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates did not choose to begin now at 70 years old and make choices which would have been contrary to who he was. He believed living long doesn’t matter, living well does. He lived a good, just, and ethical life and was poor because his life was spent on more noble things of the search of true wisdom, not of earthly self-pleasures of physical matters. He was the father of Philosophy and roamed the Athens’ Agora speaking, teaching, and asking questions of real wisdom, a kind of soul searching. He had many pupils and would seek others to find any true meaning of true knowledge. He felt like he didn’t know all things and questioned those who…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Pheobe

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates begins to prove his points on death by declaring that a philosopher is only concerned with the soul, and not with the body. Where as the rest of the world is focused on achieving bodily pleasures, philosophers don’t see truth in these physical attributes. I agree with the point Socrates begins to make, because he proves how physical attributes of the body shy away from truth. Sight and hearing have no truth to…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People will attempt to live a virtuous life, in order for the soul to remain happy after death. This believe is easier to accept, as it gives comfort, seeing that death is not the end. However, it seems to be elitist conception of heaven, since philosophers have a reserved seat in heaven. Furthermore, Plato’s view can lead to the culture of heaven and hell, and thus the idea of reward and punishment after death. Punishment or hell will lead to fear of death.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary of Phaedo

    • 4528 Words
    • 19 Pages

    A number of Socrates' friends were gathered in his cell, including his old friend Crito and two Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The account begins with Socrates proposing that though suicide is wrong, a true philosopher should look forward to death. The soul, Socrates asserts, is immortal, and the philosopher spends his life training it to detach itself from the needs of the body. He provides four arguments for this claim.…

    • 4528 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversely, Socrates centers his life around the idea of the forms, placing them at the core of his being but, realizes that he will never actually obtain the forms. Accordingly, Socrates doesn’t fear death because he doesn’t know it, and knows that he never will know it in his current life. Unlike Abraham who was not afraid to sacrifice his son because he was focused on the fact that God would make everything work out in the end, Socrates would not be afraid for other reasons. Socrates would not be hesitant to sacrifice his son because he is aware of the fact that he doesn’t know what will come after death. He proclaims in The Apology by Plato that he isn’t afraid to be put to death because no one has ever proven what comes after life. For this reason Socrates again better exemplifies the ideals of a knight of infinite resignation than those of the knight of…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays