Preview

Pledge Of Allegiance Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pledge Of Allegiance Analysis
How would Americans feel if they were prompted to participate in unconstitutional acts every day? Americans dread the thought of having their second amendment stripped away from them. However, what they do not realize is that each morning they are expected to recite a phrase that strips them of their civil rights, as stated in the first amendment: separation of church and state. The Establishment Clause forbids the government from favoring one religion, yet students are supposed to recite the Pledge of Allegiance each morning, which includes the phrase, “under God”. In the Constitution, James Madison wrote that the government shall in no way break the barrier between church and state. This means that religion has no place in politics, or anything government related. Therefore, the phrase “under God” in the pledge should be omitted because it is unconstitutional, challenges the rights of atheists and humanists who do not believe in religion, and subjects students to extreme and unnecessary ridicule.
In 1787, a Constitutional convention was called to order to amend the Articles of Confederation. Seven amendments were made, the first one listing our basic liberties, freedom of
…show more content…
Not only was it unnecessarily changed to avoid Communist accusations, it was changed to favor one religion, which is strictly prohibited in our nation’s Constitution. Atheists should not be disciplined for not reciting it- and should not be scorned for having different beliefs. The easiest way to fix the unconstitutional pledge would be to remove the phrase “under God,”, and revert back to the original version our country recited before 1954. Times have changed, and it is no longer necessary or constitutional to identify as a Christian nation. Changing the pledge would benefit students who are forced to recite it, individuals who choose not to believe in religion, and the standards to which our nation is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution, adopted by the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787 and executed on March 4, 1789, replaced the less effective Articles of Confederation, and is now the supreme law of the United States of America. It is the oldest written constitution still in use, and plays a decisive role in US law and politics. The Constitution is often hailed as a philosophical marvel, and serves as a template for several other nations. Nevertheless, it has been challenged numerous times since its creation. Our founders included a process to amend the constitution if necessary as they foresaw this. The first ten of these amendments are justly named the Bill of Rights for they protect the natural rights of citizens by putting limitations…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ ratify

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Some members of congress believed that the Articles of confederation needed to be changed meanwhile others disagreed. After the revolutionary war the people needed a…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were written to govern the interaction of the thirteen original states after winning independence from Great Britain in 1776. They proved to be ineffective so in 1787 the US Constitution was adopted to replace the Articles of…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charmander if a reasonable accommodation could be made. I would argue that there is indeed a secular purpose for reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. While her own personal views of the advancement of religion is a valid concern, I would see if there other ways around the situation. Would she be willing to have her class listen to the pledge via loudspeaker? Would she allow an individual student to lead the Pledge of Allegiance? I would also inform her that the school would have the right to provide a learning environment without disruption. I would then also inform her that school has the right to set its own curriculum. The children have the religious freedom to practice their own rights to expression as long as it is not disruptive. If she was unwilling to budge on anything I would say that the school has the right to fire her for not fulfilling her duties to teach the curriculum. As this is pointed out in my research on the Seventh District Courts decision. I would also say there doesn’t seem to a Supreme Court decision coming anytime soon that would serve as an all-encompassing Federal…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the pledge of allegiance should be revised, by Gwen Wilde, is a very well written essay that the reader would most likely deem convincing. Gwen Wilde states that the Pledge in its latest from simply requires all Americans to say the phrase “one nation, under God,” when many Americans do not believe in God. She uses many different writing strategies to get her point across in a very precise and appropriate manner. Although there are some minor problems, this analysis will explain how Gwen Wilde uses certain writing strategies that are able to back her argument with a very convincing approach.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands; one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The Pledge of Allegiance, written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy has undergone quite an evolution. It was made mandatory in schools by the US Supreme Court in 1940 but was withdrawn three years later, was congressionally recognized as national pledge in 1942 and was further augmented with words “under god” in 1954. Originally meant to be a promise or oath of loyalty to the Republic of United States of America and an expression of patriotism, it has become a lightning rod of controversy, heated passions and lawsuits. The question is whether the Pledge of Allegiance with the words “under god” violates the protections of religious freedoms enshrined in the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment? The phrase “under god” does not violate the freedom of religion found in the first amendment. This Clause dictates, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Along with time, several American’s viewpoints changed, one including religion. Unfortunately, the Pledge was no longer the simplistic faith to the country. Requiring the recital of the Pledge in the school systems instigated more controversial events. The ongoing contest against the usage of the Pledge led the House of Representatives to construct the Pledge Protections Act of 2005. The bill intended “to amend the federal judicial code to deny jurisdiction to any federal court, including controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance” (H.R. 2389 (109th)).…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gwen Wildes essay, “why the pledge should be revised,” Wilde stroungly believes that the pledge of allegiance should only be used for the sole purpose of patriotism. In wildes essay she states many facts of the original pledge. Wilde states that the first original pledge, issued in 1892, read as I Pledge Allegiance To My Flag, And To The Republic For which It Stands; One Nation Indivisible, With Liberity and Justice for all.” In her essay she included that in 1923 “My Flag” was changed to “The Flag Of The United States,’ as a way to show patriotism to the United states. Wilde then included in 1954 the words “under god,’ were included. The two words “Under God,’ infiuatues wilde, as she says “In my view, the addition of the words “under god” is inappropriate. Wilde also adds that though many of Americans are Christian, or do believe in God, why should those of another belief or nonbelievers have to say “Under God” when it does not concide with their beliefs. “It is a commendable patriotic observance,” stated by Chief Justice Rehnquist. Wilde argues that the pledge should not be connected with religion in any way. Wilde believes that the pledge in itself should just simply state patriotism, or the respect of the flag. However, it should not have the ability to force americans to announce their religious standings. I feel as if the information Gwen wilde had given is well said. It is most certain that she took the time and done inclusive amounts of research on this topic before she wrote this essay. I also feel that her argument was consistent; she had many different fact to back her beliefs up. In the essay Wilde did not sway on her reasoning, she stuck with one side of the argument, providing much information needed to make a valid point, such as quotes from the supreme court, and the original pledge itself, along with how the changes come…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I agree with you that there are plenty of other issues going on in the world that needs to be addressed; however, I do think that this is one of those issues. I believe that this is a problem because it still stands for a country that no longer represents what those words have to say. Keeping those words in the Pledge of Allegiance only further promotes reasons for people to point out those that are different. I'm not religious at all and I have never been. I was forced as a child to go to church and I was forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance every day at school. It always made me feel uncomfortable to say under God because I never felt that it represented me and what I thought our country stood for. We can't keep saying…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some think that it was part of something far and unknown. No, actually it is and forever will be a big part in American history. Trying to remove it now is thoughtless, we shouldn't have to relearn to whole pledge because of some small percentage of who either don't believe in God or don't believe in "forcing" students to say it. Removing the words "under God" from the pledge, is going to hurt our belief in traditions. In the same article it says, " 'Most Americans have recited the pledge hundreds of times and are not inclined to memorize a different pledge', he says. 'Changing it may just feel wrong. Most Americans they believe in God or a higher being and feel comfortable having "under God" in the pledge.' " In other words barley anyone wants to learn a different pledge and the current one makes sense to the majority. Furthermore, our nation was built up on religious principles, shouldn't it stay that way? Why should we change it? Also, in an article called "Trump: 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance Is 'a Great Thing' it says, " 'Because that's what we are and that is what we will always be, and that is what our people want', he said." Trump says that we thought of ourselves as living under God, and we think the same way…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In fact, it was never originally part of the pledge. During the 1950’s once Eisenhower included “under god” into the pledge, he claimed, “ In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war,” (Greene). His original intent was to separate America from communism. The communists' regime ended almost thirty years ago. Communism is no longer an issue that the U. S needs to worry about so the inclusion of “under god” has fulfilled its duty. The phrase no longer holds any social significance and should be put to…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This mindset ostracizes those who choose to opt out of saying it. Recently, a Colorado teacher of Angevine Middle School assaulted a student who refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance (Wootson). While this is just one instance, many school officials react violently to students who wish to opt out. While some are merely unaware that students have the right to sit out the Pledge, others are aware of the law but make it a point to bully students into participation anyway (Niose). Additionally, when used in an exercise designed to teach patriotism to children, the words “under God” send the message that true patriots believe in God. “While a God-believer can proudly say the Pledge of Allegiance, [a] [nonbeliever] must choose to: 1) absent [themselves] from the practice 2) participate in the exercise that denigrates [their] beliefs, or 3) say a different pledge by omitting ‘under God’ which exposes the student and makes [them] appear unpatriotic” (Miller). No one would seriously contend that the daily recitation of “one nation for atheists” is not discriminatory simply because it is optional, yet “under God” is deemed as…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pledge of Allegiance was written to fit any person in any country but the in 1945 the U.S. adopted it and changed it twice to fit our country but it wasn’t used in the morning to start the day for fifty-five years. In 2004 a student named Michael Newdow argued that “under God” challenged the right to freedom of religion and violated the prohibition on the establishment of religion in the First Amendment of the United States…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After many of these arguments whether “under god” should stay in the pledge or not. We should remove it. Because it's unfair to others with different beliefs. Like us as a nation we should understand why many people are mad about this topic. Because they came to America for freedom of religion, like amendment one says.they came to this country so they could believe in anything they wanted any other religion that isn't christianity , but our pledge is telling them otherwise.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays