In this political cartoon, “The Security Blanket” sketched by Eugene Payne (speaker), an Army veteran that later became an award-winning cartoonist, gave his thoughts over the Great Debate over gun control (subject) through this cartoon. The occasion surrounding this topic is the gun control in the US. This cartoon was directed towards the people (audience) who want more gun control (those who agree) and the hunters who want to be able to get weapons (disagree). It had first appeared in 1983 October 5 on the Charlotte Observer to present the readers with knowledge and the importance of the ongoing gun control debate. The purpose is that Payne is in favor of gun control and against the NRA’s belief in owning weapons. His tone in this sketch seems critical, because he is expressing his views over the gun control usage in which Payne clearly shows that hunters are ignorant, since they change their reason in owning a gun just for the purpose of keeping it. Now for Ethos, he establishes his credibility through his stand in opposing the NRA for being lenient on hunters. As for Pathos, he portrays the hunter as childish and babyish needing a “Security Blanket.” He represents this blanket, as the NRA and the Bill of Rights to explain that they use these excuses as a cover up to keep their fire arms. Thus with that information, he clearly established a Logos, since he explained the immaturity of hunters and the lack of reasoning they have to own a firearm.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Therefore, both Soudani and Grisez have persuasive reasons for or against gun control. Their opinions represent the two contradicting attitudes towards gun-control laws. One group prefers tighter restrictions on firearms selling and circulation. However, the other group views it as an infringement of their Second Amendment rights ("Gun Control"). All in all, an examination of gun-control laws, from various perspectives, reveals we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the political and social…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Any political cartoon, whether contemporary or historical, represents a snapshot of an artist's perspective. In this Assignment you'll look at four political cartoons drawn during the Jacksonian era. Answering the five questions…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article, “After Scalise Shooting, a Twist: Lawmakers Want to Loosen Gun Laws” by Emily Cochrane demonstrates the politics of gun control. After the recent Scalise shooting at a baseball field, gun control laws have been put into the spotlight. A debate between lawmakers who want to loosen gun control laws and lawmakers who want to make them stricter. After the Conservative lawmakers were almost victims, they decided that they should be able to have a concealed weapon on them. Being shot at gave them a different perspective on gun control and felt that it should be less intense. They felt that no matter what, “the bad guys are always going to get guns” (Cochrane). Even today, there is still debate on how strict gun control laws should…
- 235 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”…
- 1178 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
2. Should a case be denied a court hearing because there is not enough in monetary…
- 461 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The author's purpose in writing this is to show the reasons why we should be able to own guns without any restrictions. He does this by using logos and stating reasons why he, himself, owns guns. “I own a gun to protect my family” is one of the reason he uses to justify the ownership of a firearm (pg.204). This argument is viewed as helpful, because most gun owners buy guns for protection. He also states “society has men as protectors of the innocent.”(pg.204) Guns add to this perception society has. This argument can go both ways. The police are viewed as protectors or the enemy based on the area and race. It’s also stated that guns are helpful during bad…
- 858 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
From the founding of our country up until modern times there has been a separation on the beliefs of civilians owning guns. But gun control simply put, is a waste of time. It is highly ineffective in areas that gun control has been enacted in the United States. As well as “Gun Free Zones” being centralized high-target opportunities. (Small areas densely occupied by unarmed and defenseless citizens.) Thus allowing (in the rare instances it occurs like Newtown, Aurora, and Virginia Tech) a shooter a densely filled area of unarmed people to fire upon, causing mass causalities. In such areas the only protection they have are, Police/EMS, or an illegally armed citizen to defend them in case of shootout situation.…
- 888 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip” was published in the New York Times as a powerful rhetorical analysis that persuades the audience that gun control does not mean…
- 966 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This paper will provide the public with information concerning the views of anti-gun control activists and pro-gun control activists. In order to accomplish this task, this paper will answer the following questions:…
- 3553 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…
- 804 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
He inspires change in this article, in hope of extending that to his readers. His use of facts, and a well structured essay make for an overall convincing argument. He does not appear to use much of his own voice or opinions in the paper, helping to make it seem unbiased and more so a speculation and analysis of gun control.…
- 885 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Until today, Americans have not reached consensus on gun-control laws. People who disagree with stricter laws have been saying that "more guns help protect citizens" because with guns they can defend themselves. However, people who support more restrictive regulations claim that loose gun-control leads to an insecure society ("Gun Control"). Because both sides have persuasive reasons for or against gun-control laws, we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the…
- 76 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Gun control is by far one of the most controversial subjects in the entire world. Whether gun control is good or bad is debatable, though with statistics from two very different countries we will be able to form an opinion and have a better understanding of gun controls effectiveness. In evaluating and studying The United States and The United Kingdom, both being completely opposite from one another in view of Gun control we will be able to see these two different sides. The U.S having a unrestricted gun policy and U.K having a much more restrictive gun policy, we will discover the overall ideological view on culture and political standpoint.…
- 1842 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
With the Second Amendment giving American citizens the right to bear arms, and approximately fifty percent of Americans owning some form of a firearm, issues involving the ownership and possession of guns has led to debates in American society. Many feel that the some form of gun regulation is necessary in order to lower the level of gun related violence in the country. On the other hand, the opponents of gun control feel that it would be an infringement on their second amendment rights. The outcome and extent of gun control has strong political implications because it basically determines the present day meaning of the Second Amendment. While each side has strong points. Today, based on the number of crimes and violent acts committed with guns, society needs more gun control.…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays